ha ha, bitches!

[rae121452]

and what an appropriate month to rule in-


In landmark ruling, U.S. Supreme Court bars discrimination against LGBT workers
Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:12:00 -0400
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday delivered a watershed victory for LGBT rights and a defeat for President Donald Trump's administration by ruling that...



jesus fuck, if they'd made this ruling 50 years ago i'd be a millionaire.

 

[Mal_Huevo]

Trump just cant stop winning.

 

[Wrong Element]

That the replacement for the hysterically anti-gay Antonin Scalia wrote the majority opinion is icing on the cake.


This part of Gorsuch's opinion is really interesting. He's this close to getting it:


Those who adopted the Civil Rights Act might not have anticipated their work would lead to this particular result. Likely, they weren’t thinking about many of the Act’s consequences that have become apparent over the years, including its prohibition against discrimination on the basis of motherhood or its ban on the sexual harassment of male employees. But the limits of the drafters’ imagination supply no reason to ignore the law’s demands.

 

[butters]

and what an appropriate month to rule in-


In landmark ruling, U.S. Supreme Court bars discrimination against LGBT workers
Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:12:00 -0400
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday delivered a watershed victory for LGBT rights and a defeat for President Donald Trump's administration by ruling that...



jesus fuck, if they'd made this ruling 50 years ago i'd be a millionaire.

6-3

the 3 fucks that ruled for the rollback should be ashamed of themselves. i'm sure they are not.

 

[jaF0]

Donny's pet poodle pissed on his leg?

 

[HisArpy]

6-3

the 3 fucks that ruled for the rollback should be ashamed of themselves. i'm sure they are not.

For some reason I'm not quite sure that you said the same thing in other cases where the left was in the minority. Why is it that your ire for the minority always seems to fall only to 1 side?

 

[RobDownSouth]

For some reason I'm not quite sure that you said the same thing in other cases where the left was in the minority. Why is it that your ire for the minority always seems to fall only to 1 side?

Four liberals and two conservatives on the prevailing side seems pretty unambiguous to me.

 

[Wrong Element]

Donny's pet poodle pissed on his leg?

I suspect Trump doesn't actually care much one way or the other (Pence is a different story). He's a lifelong New Yorker who has moved in celebrity circles for decades.


But the people who voted for him do care, a lot. And their morale had been so high lately too...

 

[Fuzzy1975]

For some reason I'm not quite sure that you said the same thing in other cases where the left was in the minority. Why is it that your ire for the minority always seems to fall only to 1 side?

So what your saying is, 3 of the highest court judges in the USA are fine with allowing sexual discrimination, and you are fine with that logic from those who you entrust to judge the constitutionality of your legal system?

 

[PaxNurgle]

well, they are also fine with allowing unrestricted and unlimited powers of search and seizure, unrestricted executive power, contempt for individual liberty, and for dismantling the Bill of Rights. (Except for the second amendment of course, which is sacred to them.) So, in other words, I do not generally have a lot of respect for these three justices.

Ideally, a Supreme court justice should be neither "conservative" nor "liberal," nor should they be an "Activist" for any cause- either a "conservative" cause or a" liberal" one. But rather, they should interpret law according to the Constitution- including the Bill of Rights as it was intended.

 

[Bad_Egg]

You're not a millionaire because you're a moron, otherwise "sex" has been defined.

and what an appropriate month to rule in-


In landmark ruling, U.S. Supreme Court bars discrimination against LGBT workers
Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:12:00 -0400
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday delivered a watershed victory for LGBT rights and a defeat for President Donald Trump's administration by ruling that...



jesus fuck, if they'd made this ruling 50 years ago i'd be a millionaire.

https://media.giphy.com/media/NxeLIYlGJMiyI/giphy.gif

 

[rae121452]

idiot much?

 

[SpeareChucker]

"We think Justice Alito had the better of the argument: The law has long understood that sexual orientation and identity are distinct concepts from sex. When the military banned gays and lesbians alike from serving, or the immigration laws banned homosexuals from entering the country, the response was to change the law, not to pretend that the question was one of gender discrimination."

Editors, NRO





:shrug:

 

[Bad_Egg]

idiot much?

https://media.giphy.com/media/h7F3k6EbFwuivlxrsi/giphy.gif

https://media.giphy.com/media/ZiDnfvNB4PjVu/giphy.gif

 

[BrokenBarbie]

Meh...

If you don’t advertise who you’re fucking it’s immaterial.

 

[BunnySlipper]

idiot much?

The SAD GAY signs his posts

 

[HisArpy]

"We think Justice Alito had the better of the argument: The law has long understood that sexual orientation and identity are distinct concepts from sex. When the military banned gays and lesbians alike from serving, or the immigration laws banned homosexuals from entering the country, the response was to change the law, not to pretend that the question was one of gender discrimination."

Editors, NRO





:shrug:

Legislating from the bench is a fairly common thing.

 

[Ziggins]

The Civil Rights Act is only an act, not a constitutional amendment. The verdict is void if the act is repealed. The three-fourths consensus necessary for an amendment may not happen again in the nation's lifespan.