Guilty as hell?

Problem Child

titleless
Joined
Feb 21, 2001
Posts
27,935
Sure seems like it.


http://www.modbee.com/local/story/5910767p-6873181c.html

****
Relative voices suspicion

January 17, 2003 Posted: 05:20:18 AM PST


By TY PHILLIPS
BEE STAFF WRITER
Modesto police told Laci Peterson's family that her husband was having an affair and recently took out a $250,000 life insurance policy on her, a family member said Thursday.

Detectives met with Laci Peterson's side of the family Wednesday night to tell them why they believe Scott Peterson is responsible for the disappearance of his 27-year-old pregnant wife, the family member said.

Police refused to comment on the investigation Thursday, and Scott Peterson did not return calls Thursday night.

"I don't think she ever saw it coming," said the family member, who asked not to be identified. "As to exactly what happened to her, I don't really know."

According to the family member, detectives told the family that:

Peterson took out a $250,000 life insurance policy on his wife last summer, after she got pregnant.

Peterson was having an affair with a woman in the Fresno area. Detectives showed family members pictures of Peterson and the woman posing together.

Laci Peterson, expecting a baby boy Feb. 10, was reported missing on Christmas Eve. Scott Peterson, 30, has told police he went fishing that morning in Berkeley and could not find his wife once he returned home that evening.

"We're not going to confirm or deny anything," Police Chief Roy Wasden said. "We're not going to discuss this investigation."

Wasden said Peterson had not been eliminated from the investigation. He said that about 200 registered sex offenders, parolees and mentally ill homeless people -- as well as many people close to Laci Peterson -- had been ruled out in her disappearance.

"If he's innocent, fine, then take a lie detector test," the family member said. "At first, he told us he was willing to. But then he said he talked to his parents and they told him not to."

Laci Peterson's friends and family did not open the volunteer search center at the Red Lion Hotel on Thursday for the first time since establishing it there about three weeks ago. It appeared that the center would not open again.

"Obviously, it was hard to close it down," said a longtime friend of Laci Peterson's, who asked not to be identified. "Everybody's numb right now. It's hard to hear that (Scott Peterson) is not the person we all thought he was."

Since the case began, Peterson declined most interview requests, telling friends and family he wanted to keep the emphasis on his wife. Thursday, he talked to a reporter from Sacramento-area TV station KCRA.

"I really don't care what people think of me as long as it continues to keep Laci's picture, description, tip line in the media," Peterson said. "Make me the biggest villain if you want to, as long as it keeps her picture in the press. They can think anything they want of me. Let's find Laci."

The change was not lost on Laci Peterson's family.

"All of a sudden, Scott is talking to the media," the family member said. "He is realizing people are finding out about the girlfriend, so he'd better go out there and do some damage control."

Before Thursday's interview, Peterson had issued only one public statement in the form of a message written in black marker that hung in the volunteer center:

Volunteers:

As I see every person come through this door, or out searching, I tell Laci about them, looking for her.

Early this morning, I felt she could hear me. She thanks you.

Laci's husband

Investigators met with the family Wednesday because they wanted to disclose information before it came out in the National Enquirer on Thursday, the family member said.

After the meeting, Laci's family grieved and talked about her relationship with Scott, which had seemed so perfect.

"There were no signs," the family member said. "They never fought. They were never abusive to each other. He's a cold and calculating type of guy. This is a guy who has to have all the nice stuff. He wanted his Del Rio (Country Club) membership."

Several days after Laci's disappearance, Peterson stormed out of a press conference when several reporters questioned police about the fishing trip. He has not attended any more press conferences, although he regularly has spent time at the volunteer search center.

He did not sit with family members at a vigil for his wife that was held on New Year's Eve. Instead, he mingled with friends and family in the crowd, laughing and smiling a good deal of the time

****
 
Couple of things:

No blaming the guy for not taking alie detector test. it will not prove your innocence but can tarnish your credibility. Its a no win situation.

Secondly, from what I know of the case the police have handled the media very well. never playing their hand too much or giving out too much information. Kudos to them as high profile cases are too frequently handled sloppily.

Third, Until they find the body or more physical evidence, an arrest is almost impossible. Yes it looks like the husband killed his pregnant wife. If so, life in prison, no chance of parole. Lets hope the police can solve this thing but time is not on their side.
 
modest mouse said:
Couple of things:

No blaming the guy for not taking alie detector test. it will not prove your innocence but can tarnish your credibility. Its a no win situation.

I agree up to a point, but I think that if I was innocent I would risk taking it.

Secondly, from what I know of the case the police have handled the media very well. never playing their hand too much or giving out too much information. Kudos to them as high profile cases are too frequently handled sloppily.

They learned a lot during the Chandra Levy case.

Third, Until they find the body or more physical evidence, an arrest is almost impossible. Yes it looks like the husband killed his pregnant wife. If so, life in prison, no chance of parole. Lets hope the police can solve this thing but time is not on their side.

Yeah, no body, no case, but I think they'll find her. My gut feeling is the fishing trip is a cover for him dumping her body in the water. [/B]
 
Well I love her
But I love to fish
I spend all day out on this lake
And hell is all I catch
Today she met me at the door
Said I would have to choose
If I hit that fishin' hole today
She'd be packin' all her things
And she'd be gone by noon

Well I'm gonna miss her
When I get home
But right now I'm on this lake shore
And I'm sittin' in the sun
I'm sure it'll hit me
When I walk through that door tonight
That I'm gonna miss her
Oh, lookie there, I've got a bite
 
The stupidity of most murderers is both comforting and disturbing.
 
Almost everyone buys insurance when pregnant.

Lots of people fish.

Even taken together....buying insurance and going fishing...doesn't add up to killing one's spouse.

Then again, given the rampant hate & paranoia in the USA today, that's probably enough to hold him without charges indefinitely.

Let freedom reign.

Ha! Lies, cheap drrty lies.

Lance
 
He has all the appearances of being guilty, then again, so did O.J. Simpson.

However, until they can place his handmarks around the throat of the bloating floating corpse.....
 
I hope Lance marries a fisherman, and then gets pregnant.

( Don't forget the insurance policy, Lance, but make sure it covers mysterious disappearance.)
 
I read about Laci and her disappearence in Newsweek, a couple of weeks ago. In that article they told of a robbery in a neighoring home and it was a possibility that she had happened upon it and they snatched her. I mention this because I didn't see the article, here, say if that specifically had been ruled out.

Just this - Wasden said Peterson had not been eliminated from the investigation. He said that about 200 registered sex offenders, parolees and mentally ill homeless people -- as well as many people close to Laci Peterson -- had been ruled out in her disappearance.

Does having a girlfriend on the side make him a murderer? No

Buying life insurance? No

It seems that because he wanted more money, nicer things and the country club membership - all things that many people wish for - he's now being judged on.

As for the lie detector test, I can't say I blame anyone for not taking it. If I ever was in a position where I was asked to do it, I don't think I would. I think that I'd be so nervous that if they asked me if I shot Abe Lincoln I'd cause it to spike into a lie, after saying no.

Maybe its just that I hate the thoughts of a man killing his wife and not only her... but his own child. Either way I hope that they soon find her or her remains for the peace of her family.
 
Harbinger said:
I hope Lance marries a fisherman, and then gets pregnant.

( Don't forget the insurance policy, Lance, but make sure it covers mysterious disappearance.)

If I marry a fisherman and get him pregnant, I won't need any insurance policies to get rich.

Lance
 
Of course all those things (insurance policy just before she goes missing, refusal to take the lie detector test, the affair, the fact he just happened to go fishing the night she disappeared) don't make him guilty.

Duh.

Nevertheless, $100 says he did it. Any takers?
 
I'd rather toss my 100 down the toilet one penny at a time. The force of all that flushing may help her float to the top.


Not trying to be mean, but gut feeling is the dude's guilty as hell.
 
I dunno if he's guilty or not, but this thread makes me wish to hell I'd been here when that guy in Revere a few years ago...jeez, now that I think about it, that murder probably pre-dated Lit. Anyway, that guy who claimed a black man had stabbed his pregnant wife during an attempted carjacking and it turned out that he was the one who did it.


BBW, that is my #1 all-time favorite song you have quoted in your sig. =)
 
The stats are something like 75% of women murdered are killed by someone they know. And 33% are killed by their significant other. So between this stuff and the stats, odds are good he did it no?
 
JeanetteLv2:
"So between this stuff and the stats, odds are good he did it no?"


You could have written this instead: "So between this stuff and the stats, odds are good he did it."

Why did you add the last bit?
 
Problem Child:
“Never is on a crusade...everyone hide your question marks!”


*laughs*
People will soon be longing for the days of Spelling Buddy.
 
Never... *shrug* No clue. Just bad habit I guess. :( Plus suppose there's the odd possibility he didn't do it.
 
JeanetteLv2,
You've done nothing grammatically incorrect so in the eyes of God and I, you are fine. I am not chastising you so I hope you don’t feel that way.
 
The fact that there is no body

Doesnt mean he cant be charged and convicted on circumstancial evidence.

There was a famed Doctor in NY who was convicted in the death/disappearance of his wife TEN years ago,based on circumstancial evidence......the body was never found.....no clues.....It was believed that he disposed of the body in the ocean......

I followed the case and I felt there was no way he could be convicted.....But he was.....

The lack of a body may not stop the cops......
 
No worries Never hon. I'm not stressing it at all. :rose:

busybody's right. Was a case like that if I remember correctly in Chicago when I lived there where man was convicted despite lack of a body. In fact there's a case here in NM going on last couple years about a husband that's believed to have killed his wife though no body has been found. So never know.
 
Never said:
Problem Child:
“Never is on a crusade...everyone hide your question marks!”


*laughs*
People will soon be longing for the days of Spelling Buddy.

The spelling buddy is still around. You could be the punctuation and general grammar buddy.


JeanetteLv2- busybody is never right. Trust me on this.
 
Re: The fact that there is no body

busybody said:
Doesnt mean he cant be charged and convicted on circumstancial evidence.

There was a famed Doctor in NY who was convicted in the death/disappearance of his wife TEN years ago,based on circumstancial evidence......the body was never found.....no clues.....It was believed that he disposed of the body in the ocean......

I followed the case and I felt there was no way he could be convicted.....But he was.....

The lack of a body may not stop the cops......

So if somebody is legally dead does that mean they could have been legally murdered? :D
 
It’s possible to convict someone without a body. Part of a body will do.

PC, Now there’s an idea that’s bound to cause trouble.
 
Never said:
It’s possible to convict someone without a body. Part of a body will do.


That reminds me of that HBO show on forensic scientists. On one show they figured out who a murder victim was with nothing but an 18" piece of her torso floating in the Mississippi. Her husband chopped her up with a chainsaw.

On another one, they found a fingernail and some blood on a bridge. Her husband went to an isolated bridge, and stuffed her body parts in a wood chipper, and spewed her over the side into a river.

Nice, huh?
 
Back
Top