group sex porn: wtf?

hey... let's call over the baseball team and fuck your girlfriend all at once!yeah!

  • good in small doses.

    Votes: 16 39.0%
  • boring as fuck. too much, too soon.

    Votes: 12 29.3%
  • i love it! it's the best! it's the only kinda porn worth watching!

    Votes: 8 19.5%
  • so many others, so little time.

    Votes: 5 12.2%

  • Total voters
    41

killallhippies

Literotica Guru
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Posts
60,313
specificly: that shit were 3-6 guys all hop on one chick at the same time. who actually likes this shit enough to buy videos of just that and nothing else? maybe it's just me, but that shit bores me. it's just too much and there's nothing arousing about it. maybe i don't objectify women enough, but i am a fan of lesbian porn, so i can't see how that could be true.

anyone have any answers? anyone? hmmm, how about you in the back? do you have anything to say?
 
4 people in the same sex scene is my limit. Any more than that and I'm turned off, mostly because there's just too much to keep track of.
 
Minkey Boodle said:
That's just too much wing-ding for one person to take.

it is a lot of wingding. hell, half the guys are just getting half-ass handjobs in most of the ones i've seen. it just looks like no fun.
 
The only group ones worth a damn is where there is only one guy or all girls and even then it gets boring after a while. The camera jumps around trying to show everything and there is very little acually going on.
 
I like it. Not the multiple guys on one woman or vice versa, but a whole bunch of people getting sexual together - oh yeah. Like every other genre, there's good stuff and bad stuff, but group sex fantasies turn me on and I find some group sex porn fab.

If I had the money, I'd like to join this site:
http://www.naughtyallie.com

I think it has the kind of stuff I like.

So if anyone has a password they want to share, you know where to send it!
 
I have a theory about this.

I reckon that this type of porn is basically just a way for closet cases to watch gay sex without admitting to themselves that they are.

I mean, combine 5 men and 1 woman and what sex are you usually looking at ?
 
glamorilla said:
i'm in!!!

Watching and doing are definitely two different things ... not that I'd know anything about that sorta thing. :D :eek:
 
Last edited:
Pookie said:
Watching and doing are definitely two different things ... not that I'd know anything about that sorta thing. :D :eek:

oh my goodness i wonder if my pure little innocent self could ever handle such a thing!

*giggles*
 
Borscht said:
I have a theory about this.

I reckon that this type of porn is basically just a way for closet cases to watch gay sex without admitting to themselves that they are.

I mean, combine 5 men and 1 woman and what sex are you usually looking at ?

actually, this theory makes as much sense as my women hater theory. almost makes you wonder...
 
smartandsexy said:
I like it. Not the multiple guys on one woman or vice versa, but a whole bunch of people getting sexual together - oh yeah. Like every other genre, there's good stuff and bad stuff, but group sex fantasies turn me on and I find some group sex porn fab.

If I had the money, I'd like to join this site:
http://www.naughtyallie.com

I think it has the kind of stuff I like.

So if anyone has a password they want to share, you know where to send it!

http://www.naughtyallie.com/guestarea/updates/images/maryannejoeljake085.jpg \
Yowza!
 
Optimal Group Sex

Like anything else, more is better only up to a point. Triple Pens are the zenith of men on woman group sex, and a pyramid of two women with a man as the base is as good as it gets for the reverse. Attempts to add more players just degrade the experiece. In My Opinion, of course.
 
I firmly believe that there should only be as many men in a sex scene as there are standard (no ear fucking, please!) female orifices in which to insert their willies. And I don't count hands. Watching a chick give a guy a hand-job doesn't do it for me.

This rule does, of course, only apply to non-gay porn. But I tend to avoid gay porn as it's not a turn-on to me.
 
Celtic Princess said:
The blonde's arm is just too skinny. Sort of scary looking.

I think part of her arm is hidden in the gap between the sofa cushions. If you look at her upper arm it's normal size, comparatively.

I think both girls are lovely. The sofa, however, is not.
 
Yeah, now that you've pointed it out, that makes it a little better. And you're right Nora, the sofa is ick.
 
Back
Top