lovetoread
hello daddy
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2001
- Posts
- 42,978
And you're yet posting on this awful American board.
Why don't you go and see if there's a British one you can annoy?
Dude, what are you on?
And can I have some?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And you're yet posting on this awful American board.
Why don't you go and see if there's a British one you can annoy?
We celebrate the FAILURE of that attack - by burning effigies of people we don't like at the moment.
Lewes is your neck of the woods, isn't it?
Close enough to visit for November 5th. One of my youngest daughter's friends is a member of one of the Lewes Bonfire Societies.
Dude, what are you on?
And can I have some?
I've only been once, it's fucking insane.
I've read all of his articles, and I agree with him.
I don't understand why the man who died of idiocy has been made into a martyr.
I like what Medred said: that the kid was a thief, poacher and scofflaw.
I've read all of his articles, and I agree with him.
I don't understand why the man who died of idiocy has been made into a martyr.
That Chris McCandless was a pie-eyed idiot is part of the fascination. It's the same fascination in Darwin Award type behavior that made Timothy Treadwell an apt subject for Werner Herzog in Grizzly Man.
They're object lessons in Don't Do This.
...It could leave many more than a little troubled that some schools in America actually encourage students to read Krakauer's eulogy to the bum, poacher and thief Chris McCandless as if his behaviors had redeeming value...
Or these luckier guys
I don't know if I agree. I loved Grizzly Man, but I knew I was watching a loony. I think Jon Krakaeur's treatment of his subject is decidedly more romanticized. The former felt like a cautionary tale and the latter felt like hagiography. I see your point, though. There is certainly a similarity.
Forget condoms, contraceptive pills and chlamydia, and turn instead to Chekhov, Tolstoy and Gogol. That is the message from Russia's children's ombudsman, Pavel Astakhov, who has opposed the introduction of sex education to schools and says young Russians can learn everything they need to know about love and sex from Russian literature.
...
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2013/9/19/1379592668257/1997-ANNA-KARENINA-008.jpg
Forget condoms, contraceptive pills and chlamydia, and turn instead to Chekhov, Tolstoy and Gogol. That is the message from Russia's children's ombudsman, Pavel Astakhov, who has opposed the introduction of sex education to schools and says young Russians can learn everything they need to know about love and sex from Russian literature.
"I am against any kind of sex education among children," said Astakhov in a television interview. "It is unacceptable to allow things that could corrupt children."
Despite having one of the world's fastest-growing HIV epidemics, Russia has no sex education in schools, owing to the influence of the Russian Orthodox church and conservative social forces.
Astakhov, a powerful official who reports directly to the president, Vladimir Putin, now wants legislation to ensure sex education does not sneak on to the curriculum. Instead, he suggests reading the classics.
"The best sex education that exists is Russian literature," said Astakhov. "In fact, literature in general. Everything is there, about love and about relationships between sexes. Schools should raise children chastely and with an understanding of family values."- read the full article Russian literature is best sex education for young people, says ombudsman (from The Guardian)
Wow. How very 18th Century.
"A closed mind is a prison from which no man can escape"
You're generous.
I was thinking 13th.
What was the darkest part of the Dark Ages?
As far as I know, Sex Ed has only been taught in schools in the past 50 years or so. Perhaps I'm off, tho.
The darkest part? The economic setback and decline.