Shankara20
Well, that is lovely
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2005
- Posts
- 58,546
WTF???
I have in the dark back of my mind a thought I have seldom shared. This brings that thought to mind again.
It is just possible that male nudity is not as widely enjoyed as female nudity is that for some seeing a naked non-lover man erect is tantamount to seeing him brandishing a weapon. From a rape awareness place I understand that, but give me a break.
As Freud said, "Sometimes a hard cock is just a hard cock", or something like that anyway.
"Good, clean, limp, innocuous, fluffy penis" Give me a break!
I have loads of pics of beautiful flaccid cocks. They are incredible objects of art, each with a personality all its own. In many ways more interesting to view then pics of hard cocks.
But adding "good" and "innocuous" adds, I think, a moral judgement that leads to a hard cock being "bad" and "guilty".
or am I over thinking this...
ps: until I found this photo from the book Mr. Funny Pants by Michael Showalter I never hear the term "intellectually curious penis" or that it might not be good thing.
Come to think of it, my penis might just be "intellectually curious" as it does like to stick itself into new things to come to understand it better