p_p_man
The 'Euro' European
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2001
- Posts
- 24,253
Yiihaaa!!
Bush is going to invade Iraq. Unless you believe the stories beginning to circulate that he doesn't want to any more...
And Homeland Security is finally underway. Until you realise that there's no budget for it for 2003...
And Osman bin Laden is on the run, or is he dead? Who knows? Who cares? At least George showed those Afghans not to mix with America...
Anyone remember the ballistic-missile-defence program? George does. It's something he can understand. Not like these terrorist chappies who won't stand still and be killed in the usual, familiar fashion...
That why $7.4 billion will be spent on R&D for missile defences next year. That's twice the sum Reagan spent on the same thing in his final year of office. Right on! A system that remains sketchily defined and technologically dubious, against an unlikely threat that lies years. if not decades ahead, George is willing to spend a lot of hard earned cash...
But for defence against "weapons of mass destruction" that could snuff out thousands of American lives, on American streets next week he's spending far less than would be needed for a serious minimal effort.
Yiiihaaa!
Confused or mad?
After all Nixon was President whilst under the influence of drink and drugs...
Why not George?
ppman
(with a nod in the direction of MSN and the History Channel)
Bush is going to invade Iraq. Unless you believe the stories beginning to circulate that he doesn't want to any more...
And Homeland Security is finally underway. Until you realise that there's no budget for it for 2003...
And Osman bin Laden is on the run, or is he dead? Who knows? Who cares? At least George showed those Afghans not to mix with America...
Anyone remember the ballistic-missile-defence program? George does. It's something he can understand. Not like these terrorist chappies who won't stand still and be killed in the usual, familiar fashion...
That why $7.4 billion will be spent on R&D for missile defences next year. That's twice the sum Reagan spent on the same thing in his final year of office. Right on! A system that remains sketchily defined and technologically dubious, against an unlikely threat that lies years. if not decades ahead, George is willing to spend a lot of hard earned cash...
But for defence against "weapons of mass destruction" that could snuff out thousands of American lives, on American streets next week he's spending far less than would be needed for a serious minimal effort.
Yiiihaaa!
Confused or mad?
After all Nixon was President whilst under the influence of drink and drugs...
Why not George?
ppman
(with a nod in the direction of MSN and the History Channel)