Free Food For All, So Some Aren't Stigmatized

right.. children should starve while their single parent's struggle to keep a roof over their head to teach them a moral lesson...

because god knows, there is no such thing as a dead beat dad.. it's all the womans fault for getting knocked up in the first place

I guess she could have gotten an abortion... but that would have also been morally wrong...

and where would we be if we couldnt blame women?
 
The US Department of Agriculture. Brought to you by the Republican Party.
 
You believe single mothers should be locked up in camps, ffs. Sorry, not camps, "facilities".
 
Yes, people who want to feed children are evil.

Single moms are evil too.

You people are out of your fucking minds!
 
right.. children should starve while their single parent's struggle to keep a roof over their head to teach them a moral lesson...

because god knows, there is no such thing as a dead beat dad.. it's all the womans fault for getting knocked up in the first place

I guess she could have gotten an abortion... but that would have also been morally wrong...

and where would we be if we couldnt blame women?

Don't argue with christian logic
 
The kids won't eat the Broccoli, toefucky or celery sticks anyway, more business for the garbage picker-uppers.

No winners and no losers, poor babies, the ultimate dream of the socialists and progressives, bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator.

And, of course, the sob sisters of the left are quick to pounce with the bleeding heart's refrain: predictable.

Besides...who gets the 30 percent fat content ground beef and who gets the fillet mignon? Take a guess. Union teachers do eat well, do they not?

You don't want to be poor, or a single mom and poor? Get a Job! (song)

:)

ami
 
The Department Of Agriculture needs to be shut down. It's been taken over by insane Socialists bent on making the world safe for incompetent, irresponsible, single moms who choose to inflict upon society the consequences of their utterly promiscuous lifestyles:

So punish the kids because of their mother's decision? :confused:
 
You believe single mothers should be locked up in camps, ffs. Sorry, not camps, "facilities".

I had forgotten about that. I wonder whether there's any way to search for that still.

Wasn't it a variation of the theme of "wanton young sluts casting shame on family and community/ virile young men understandably sowing their oats" theme?
 
I'm guessing that the GOP members of the House are happy campers about this as it rewards a GOP core constituency...farmers and food processors.

Our Usual Suspects missed the part about the free lunches going to families with money enough to pay for school meals.
 
I had forgotten about that. I wonder whether there's any way to search for that still.

Wasn't it a variation of the theme of "wanton young sluts casting shame on family and community/ virile young men understandably sowing their oats" theme?

I'll find it, hang on.
 
So Vetteman has gone from dictating politics to dictating morality.

That's a whole other level of fucked up there, buddy.
 
Actions have to have consequences. If we have to shoulder her responsibilities, the government should make her children wards of the State and she should be made to work off the debt of having us support her irresponsibility for 18 fucking years. Fuck this phony shit.

what penalties for the father? or does this misogynistic crap only apply to single mums who got knocked up by lesbians?
 
I'll find it, hang on.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=24574165&postcount=61

My point is that parents should be a hell of a lot closer to their kids than the damn school system. When I was young a pregnant girl simply disappeared from school, she was sent to alternative facilities, at any rate her situation was removed form the scene so that her fucked up morality didn't influence the rest of the student body. Maybe that was harsh but it worked to the extent we didn't have the kind of promiscuousness and illegitimacy we see worshiped, condoned, and apologized for today.
 
I don't see any kids getting punished, I see them getting stuffed surreptitiously at taxpayer expense. We ought to punish those who failed to take up the responsibility of parenthood.

we punish the mothers by letting the kids suffer from malnourishment? :confused:

i get the point james points out, though.
 
Actions have to have consequences. If we have to shoulder her responsibilities, the government should make her children wards of the State and she should be made to work off the debt of having us support her irresponsibility for 18 fucking years. Fuck this phony shit.


Do you know how expensive that is? I worked for a couple years in a group home for kids who were wards of the state. We billed the county $160 per day and that was in the late 90s.

What's your economic plan to afford your policy? Please show your math.
 
Actions have to have consequences. If we have to shoulder her responsibilities, the government should make her children wards of the State and she should be made to work off the debt of having us support her irresponsibility for 18 fucking years. Fuck this phony shit.

Be careful what you ask for. I had a case involving a woman named Marsha. Marsha's racket was having babies by illegals. She slept with plenty, and when she got pregnant she hit all the guys for money. But sooner or later they got wise, and almost always one of them put her in the hospital with a ruptured uterus and an expensive preemee. The guys literally kicked the babies outta her body.

But nigga-mexicans are tough as dump rats.

In 1996 I started legal action to terminate her parental rights to kid #1. By 2005 I had terminated 8 of her kids, and she had 2 more waiting for court. She told me she could pump out babies faster than I could take them, and she was right.
 
Yeah, so what? That's how it was. I realize that mentioning it to big pussies like you is a major affront to your leftist sensibilities but tough shit.

Do you agree with that policy?
 
Back
Top