Free association thread 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Esso means: Happy Motoring

damn...i just flashed back 45 years or so to remember that one

Whenever I'm riding with daddy
He always takes me, of course
To the station that gives lots of service
At the sign of the flying red horse

:)
 
What, better than Esso Blue?

Ah, I remember the Esso Blee Dooler.


Esso means: Happy Motoring

damn...i just flashed back 45 years or so to remember that one

"Oh the Esso sign means Happy Motoring
Happy Motoring
Oh the Esso sign means Happy Motoring
Call at the Esso Sign"

It was in opposition to the Shell campaign (remember Bing singing it ?)
("You can be sure of Shell")

And the red horse was from Mobile; I think.
 
I never did understand "Community Chest"

It is like the 'Chatham Chest' which was a sum of money kept to look after injured Royal Navy sailors.

'Community Chest' is basically government taxation which might ask you for hundreds of Monopoly pounds in property taxes, or give you a pittance of someone's else's money.

The designers of Monopoly were cynics.
 
It is like the 'Chatham Chest' which was a sum of money kept to look after injured Royal Navy sailors.

'Community Chest' is basically government taxation which might ask you for hundreds of Monopoly pounds in property taxes, or give you a pittance of someone's else's money.

The designers of Monopoly were cynics.

The designers of Monopoly were, in fact, Marxists. Seems strange for a game so relentlessly capitalistic, but it's true...

There were two sets of rules: the "capitalist" rules (which survived and are still in play today) and the "cooperative" rules, which no one remembers.

When played the first way, the point was to show that if left to the market, all money and property ends up in the hands of one individual, the inevitable concentration of wealth attendant on the unbridled free market.

When played the second way, the game was much more even-handed, with everyone able to sustain themselves and the money and property distributed more or less equally throughout the time of play. Of course, there was no "winner" the second way, so it never caught on.
 
The designers of Monopoly were, in fact, Marxists. Seems strange for a game so relentlessly capitalistic, but it's true...

There were two sets of rules: the "capitalist" rules (which survived and are still in play today) and the "cooperative" rules, which no one remembers.

When played the first way, the point was to show that if left to the market, all money and property ends up in the hands of one individual, the inevitable concentration of wealth attendant on the unbridled free market.

When played the second way, the game was much more even-handed, with everyone able to sustain themselves and the money and property distributed more or less equally throughout the time of play. Of course, there was no "winner" the second way, so it never caught on.

Sorry...but the true lesson of Monopoly is that with it, just as in real life, the banker always ends up with the most money. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top