Baztrachian
Ars est celare artem
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Posts
- 1,993
Let's not also forget that Russian nuclear forces are a shadow of their former self. It's debatable whether those weapons would actually work - look at whats happened with their ballistic missile launches - and one failure immediately removes the credibility of their nuclear deterrent. What if they launched a nuke and it was a dud?
Russia's Mayak nuclear facility suffered a devastating disaster back in 2017.
https://www.livescience.com/66050-radiation-cloud-secret-russian-nuclear-accident.html
Mayak was their only weapons-grade processing facility and it is kaput.
Russian nuclear cores have a shelf life of about ten years and that means anything older than 2015 is iffy at best for functionality.
NONE of the Soviet era nukes are functional at this point. Maybe they can be used as dirty bombs but they will NOT go critical. I doubt that the weapons themselves are in good shape given the damage that constant radioactive bombardment does to metal objects like weapons casings, delicate electronics, and etc.
Frankly, once you account for Russian corruption I'd expect that Russia has fewer than a dozen functional weapons. Maybe even none.
The bloody things cost money when they're just sitting around and Russia doesn't have that kind of money.