For Fucks Sake!

[TheeGoatPig]

It sucks when the writer takes their time building up all of this tension, taking a page to introduce oral on the man, another page for oral on the woman, and yet another page lining cock and pussy up, and yet the moment insertion is completed the rest of the the story is only two to five more paragraphs. The whole rest of the story. I never understood why so many stories devolve like that. Surely it took these authors more than one stroke session to write these offerings? They didn't write 20 pages all at once, then cum, and just throw an ending on? Wait until tomorrow and write a proper sex session, and a real ending to your story. For fucks sake! (literally ).

 

[lovecraft68]

I think the reason for this is that in erotica the climax of the story is, well its the climax of sex.

Once the author has built the tension, gotten the characters together and given a good scene the story for erotica purposes is kind of over(unless there will be another chapter)

Personally the story ending not long after sex never bothers me. The stories where is all of six paragraphs before the sex then all sex and the end annoys me. I'm not much of a stroke reader, but if the author built up to the sex and its a decent sex scene I'm happy with it being the end.

That's the thing about lit vastly different tastes in reading as well as writing.

 

[jomar]

My guess is the writer was wanking while writing and when he/she got to the finale after the big buildup there was no motivation to drag it out any further...so smoke 'em if ya got 'em or take a nap.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

My latest ends in a fist fight.

 

[sr71plt]

In porn, the sex act is the resolution. Hardly surprising that it is in much of erotica too.

 

[TxRad]

In porn, the sex act is the resolution. Hardly surprising that it is in much of erotica too.

True, but does adding more afterwards make the story any better?

I think most of the time, yes, because it gives more of a resolution to things. That is, if there was a plot to begin with.

 

[TheeGoatPig]

I'm not just talking about the story ending after the sex. I understand that. I'm talking about a long buildup with a rushed sex act. Sometimes the author will even throw in a gangbang in two sentences just to say it was there. I have spent hours reading a buildup, and then one partner after another blasts through the action in a sentence each.

Author spends two hours building up the seduction masterfully.

Author spends half hour on oral sex, really well written so the reader gets super excited.

Author writes one paragraph detail a weeks worth of sex.

"Bill and Lori were finally doing it! they were fucking, and everyone was watching! Lori was so glad to finally be having sex in front of everyone! If her dreams were to actually come true this would turn into a gangbang, and it did! Billy rolled her over and Steven took her asshole while Glen shoved his cock in her mouth! Steven came first, her ass was so tight, and her mouth was so talented Glen came shortly after. Her holes were quickly refilled by cock after cock. She was gangbanged for five hours without a break! Lori was so covered in cum by the end of it should couldn't find a clear spot of skin left on her body. She was so satisfied she didn't know how she would ever enjoy regular sex with just one man."

I have seen stories culminate so clumsily. It's like the writer only knows how to write the buildup, and not the actual sex.

 

[Darkniciad]

I've seen that too. It's really jarring - especially when it's the actual end of the story. Bad enough when it's just the end of a scene.

 

[sr71plt]

I'm not just talking about the story ending after the sex. I understand that. I'm talking about a long buildup with a rushed sex act. Sometimes the author will even throw in a gangbang in two sentences just to say it was there. I have spent hours reading a buildup, and then one partner after another blasts through the action in a sentence each.

I doubt I'd enjoy the story either, but there's a line of argument that erotica is the build up, not the explosion.

 

[TxRad]

I have seen stories culminate so clumsily. It's like the writer only knows how to write the buildup, and not the actual sex.

You might be surprised at how many writers actually do have a problem writing the sex scenes. It either ends up sounding like a manual or is short and hurried up and over.

Sex is never easy to do right.

 

[patientlee]

I'm not just talking about the story ending after the sex. I understand that. I'm talking about a long buildup with a rushed sex act. Sometimes the author will even throw in a gangbang in two sentences just to say it was there. I have spent hours reading a buildup, and then one partner after another blasts through the action in a sentence each.

Author spends two hours building up the seduction masterfully.

Author spends half hour on oral sex, really well written so the reader gets super excited.

Author writes one paragraph detail a weeks worth of sex.

"Bill and Lori were finally doing it! they were fucking, and everyone was watching! Lori was so glad to finally be having sex in front of everyone! If her dreams were to actually come true this would turn into a gangbang, and it did! Billy rolled her over and Steven took her asshole while Glen shoved his cock in her mouth! Steven came first, her ass was so tight, and her mouth was so talented Glen came shortly after. Her holes were quickly refilled by cock after cock. She was gangbanged for five hours without a break! Lori was so covered in cum by the end of it should couldn't find a clear spot of skin left on her body. She was so satisfied she didn't know how she would ever enjoy regular sex with just one man."

I have seen stories culminate so clumsily. It's like the writer only knows how to write the buildup, and not the actual sex.

My pet peeve is "she came three more times". Sure. Just like that.

 

[WifeWatchman]

It's all about the buildup... I get the most compliments for the "excruciating" buildup of some of my stories. Once the sex starts happening, the reader has either come already or a too-lengthy discussion of the act doesn't further build the tension and excitement. I daresay maybe the author has come when he/she gets into writing the actual act, and therefore doesn't write lengthily upon it.

Of course, many stories do give the write-up of the actual intercourse act in great detail, so it may be just a matter of hunting around for the stories (and authors) that best give you what you want to read.

WifeWatchman's Stories

 

[sr71plt]

Sex is never easy to do right.

And if you try to write it realistically, it comes out so hilarious and weird that you can't stop laughing long enough to write it down.

 

[SecondCircle]

I have to agree with you OP.

Yes, buildup, character building, tension... I'm not gonna list them cause we know them... are all important. Like very important.

BUT all that slow buildup and stuff that's pulled you deeper and deeper into the rabbit hole should have a "quality" climax. Not just a climax. Yeah the touchy feely stuff and the foreplay and the blowjobs and 69's and nipple whistlers are often one of the best parts, but that shouldn't mean that when its time for Tab A and Slot B, it shouldn't be two paragraphs that roughly translate to, "and then they had sex. And it was good sex. They came hard."

Fuck that. I wanna know what went down. I wanna sense it with every sense I got. That's the championship game there, the Superbowl, the fuckin pearly gates! You better describe that shit with passion. Don't work me up and get me hooked, end it and say "well the best part is the climb."

I couldn't bring myself to right such a lifeless snippet of a scene. I would feel kinda let down if I read it, so my characters usually screw each others brains out. And you get to watch it all.