First: “If Mexico is unwilling to pay for the badly needed wall...

Ummmm...didn't Barry vote to build a wall when he was in Congress?

Must be a racist lie.

The peso closed up today. But alternative facts suggests it went down.

59% approval rating. Then there are the smucks that hate what he has done but would have loved it if Obama did it.

Pure entertainment.
 
Their shit is getting weaker by the day and the narrative they got suckered into is crumbling right before their eyes. It hurts when you finally learn there is no Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Poor kids.
 
The GB's most proud socialists - domestic and foreign - gotta love being on the same side of the American President's wall as illegals, the drug cartel-corrupted federal government of Mexico, and the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood:

WASHINGTON — The executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said Wednesday that refusing to accept Muslim refugees is the moral equivalent of slavery.

CAIR held a press conference in anticipation of executive orders from President Donald Trump to limit refugee entry from several Muslim-majority countries, block federal funds from sanctuary cities and start construction of a wall on America’s southern border.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/25/c...sions-is-equivalent-to-slavery/#ixzz4Wv9JgrK9


Nihad Awad, CAIR’s national executive director, called the proposed border wall a “multi-billion dollar monument to racism.” Awad went on to say that President Trump’s proposal has nothing to do with national security and is strictly an “Islamophobic” proposal.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/25/c...sions-is-equivalent-to-slavery/#ixzz4Wv9CpZ1q

Awad is a full-fledged Islamic jihadi, born in Jordon and a Hamas stooge. President Trump would be wise to ExOrdr immigration to revoke his naturalized US citizenship on the grounds of his terrorist support of enemies of America and then deport his terrorist ass out of this nation ASAP.

Meanwhile, watch some of the GB socialists' little punkass protester bros pull their totally meaningless shit in socialist haven Portland yesterday...

https://twitter.com/KelseyWattsKPTV/status/824399234761756672/video/1

...and then how some of America's finest responded and how other Americans reacted:

https://twitter.com/KelseyWattsKPTV/status/824401193355010048/video/1
 
The final Solution?

A wall is not needed.

The US gun lobby should be advised that The Corporation will be setting up shooting galleries on a 1000 metre strip north of the entire border and inviting as many Mexicans that fancy their chances, to try and cross it. All red bloodied Americans who like a little sport huntin' will be invited to bring their own guns.

The Corporation plans to have at least a million shooters for the opening weekend - sure to draw a better crowd than an inauguration. No charge - the Corporation will just make a few bucks from Ammo sales.

Special prizes for best daily tally - and extra special prizes for a kill shot on a kid or pregnant woman - after all who wants those brats on Social security and we right thinkin' Americans definitely prefer a pregnancy to end with the death of a Mexican mother rather than risk the moral horror of an abortion in God's own country.

Targets guaranteed for the whole openin' season. We just gotta make sure that Mexico is so impoverished they will keep on coming.;)
 
The administration is also weighing a measure that would allow the State Department to review its list of foreign terrorist groups. If signed, the Post reported, the order could begin the process of officially designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.

Report: Trump considering executive orders on security
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...executive-orders-evaluating-national-security

http://www.michaelmaharrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/git-er-done.jpg
 
I find it funny how you speculate what will happen next, then speculate again about how bad it would be, then when sufficiently dark picture of the future is formed in your head - you start hating Trump for it as if it has already came to be.:cattail:

All the news articles include the word "could" a lot, yet sound so offensive that you don't even pay attention to that.
Oh, sure, "Trump could command the military to level up New-York tomorrow (for not supporting him during the election or something), and he could also drop Nukes on Mexico and all adjacent states (for good measure)." Oh he Could. But will he?

Don't you see that ANY AT ALL news article can be written with the vague words like "could" and in future tense? But that's the thing. Future is not the NEWS. It's speculation. Your news agencies report very small news snippet and then SPECULATE at length about where it will lead and what could happen then.

"Trump ate a toast for breakfast today. By the way, he likes toasts, so he COULD make all Americans obliged to eat toasts every day in the morning. And the punishment for disobedience will be imprisonment for 2 years!"
 
Last edited:
Well, he is cutting funding for all that frivolous shit like the arts. A poor country like the United States can't afford to support the higher impulses of civilization.

How about the rich support the higher impulses of civilization instead of forcing the middle class to fund it.

Awwwww poor elitist!!! I'm sure the working class will weep for you. :)
 
Last edited:
I find it funny how you speculate what will happen next, then speculate again about how bad it would be, then when sufficiently dark picture of the future is formed in your head - you start hating Trump for it as if it has already came to be.:cattail:

All the news articles include the word "could" a lot, yet sound so offensive that you don't even pay attention to that.
Oh, sure, "Trump could command the military to level up New-York tomorrow (for not supporting him during the election or something), and he could also drop Nukes on Mexico and all adjacent states (for good measure)." Oh he Could. But will he?

Don't you see that ANY AT ALL news article can be written with the vague words like "could" and in future tense? But that's the thing. Future is not the NEWS. It's speculation. Your news agencies report very small news snippet and then SPECULATE at length about where it will lead and what could happen then.

"Trump ate a toast for breakfast today. By the way, he likes toasts, so he COULD make all Americans obliged to eat toasts every day in the morning. And the punishment for disobedience will be imprisonment for 2 years!"

An entire generation of Americans have been raised in an environment where major news organizations have absolutely no journalistic integrity. Americans don't understand the concept of actual journalism.

Who what when where and why. If it doesn't accurately answer one of those 5 questions it isn't journalism.

As you point out, maybe is not journalism.
 
I support building the wall and hiring 5,000 more Border Patrol agents. I support supporting those agents with drones to more effectively stop illegals from crossing the border.

This confuses me. The border patrol is one of, if not, the largest federal department. How can the government hire 5k more agents when they just put a freeze on federal hiring and want to make cuts to federal positions? They already use drones and have for a while.
 
This confuses me. The border patrol is one of, if not, the largest federal department. How can the government hire 5k more agents when they just put a freeze on federal hiring and want to make cuts to federal positions? They already use drones and have for a while.

It reads like what perhaps "confuses" you the most is your own subjective take that those 5k aren't needed, because the BP isn't anywhere close to being "the largest federal department" and the new freeze doesn't cover the BP or "the largest federal department", because both are exempt from the freeze as they are both "national security, public safety, and the military" concerns.
 
So we have a declining illegal alien population and an increase in desire for terrorist attacks from another direction and the "solution" is to take money from other areas of DHS to use in building a wall along the southern border. Make perfect sense. :rolleyes:

It's interesting that the administration is claiming that the authorization for the wall is the Secure Fence Act of 2006 that authorizes the building of 700 miles of fence, which has already been built.

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 authorizes two Ford class aircraft carriers. I guess that means they can actually build six.

Buy local.
Not necessarily a solution.
A large portion of domestic farm work is done by illegal aliens (some estimates have over 50% of dairy farm workers as being illegal aliens) and they are all getting deported according to Trump. So even local food is going to increase in price.
Except milk because the price of that is set by the government, so dairy farms will just go out of business because the cost of labor won't be sustainable, or there will be more government subsidies from the lowered taxes to keep them in business.
 
BTW: did you know The totally partisan New York Times' largest shareholder is a Mexican who made his billions in the totally cronyism-corrupt Mexican telecommunications industry?

Very interestingly, the usually private Carlos Slim will hold a press conference later today, during which he will even take questions from reporters.

Two .5%ers going after each other in public? And one of the them is the President of the United States of America? Yeah, I'm thinking Slim is way out of his league on this one.

Maybe he'll try playing the role of fake good cop to Nieto's wannabe bad cop? Whatever: Mexico - in the perilous economic and corrupted civil state they're currently wallowing in - CANNOT afford in the least to endanger a solid relationship with their northern neighbor.

Unfortunately, Hispanic machismo has been known to do much stupider things.

In November, Forbes called Slim the world’s “biggest billionaire loser” after Trump’s election, after his fortune plunged from 451.7 billion to an estimated $45.2 billion.

During the presidential campaign, Trump accused Slim—who supported Hillary Clinton-- of orchestrating negative coverage of him in the Times. At one point, the real estate mogul said Times reporters were "not journalists" but were "corporate lobbyists for Carlos Slim and Hillary Clinton."

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/0...ence-days-after-border-wall-announcement.html
 
Honest observers would seek out what a past Commander of the United States Southern Command - who now just happens to be the United States Secretary of Homeland Security - says about the stark danger of terrorist infiltration from the south before fantasizing themselves even remotely able to even comment on the issue in any credible sense.
 
Back
Top