G
Guest
Guest
Today I needed to read something like this, along with Sub Joe's post on the 'special day' thread. My furniture is floating about (see the essay) and I am holding on to a sofa cushion that my bunny peed on (he's fine, saner than me).
Perdita
------
Jon Carroll - March 12, 2004 ©2004 San Francisco Chronicle
A while ago -- it was either during the Clinton administration or the reign of Charles II, they're easy to confuse -- I wrote that most of the people I knew were crazy. Not zany, not weird, not antic: crazy. Their ace in the hole was that they knew that they were crazy.
I myself am pretty much nuts. I understand that reality is at best a tenuous construct. The pieces of everyday life are slowly drifting apart, like furniture in the water after a great ocean liner sinks.
It is not at all clear what's in the gaps. Obsession and compulsion, certainly; the mysteries of the universe; God or somebody like him; death; unexplained washes of color; memory; context; song lyrics. Sometimes it feels as though we are underwater; sometimes it feels as though we are flying.
Seeing the fragility of reality is not a survival skill; when you're in your 20s and 30s, it's just not useful. You gotta believe that the saber- toothed tiger is real, you gotta hold onto the common illusion while your personality is formed. But after a while, you let go, and the subjective nature of perception becomes clear. And who is to say which terrors are real; who is to say which jokes are funny?
I am, of course, capable of acting as though reality were real. Do it all the time. I just have my fingers crossed.
So I was playing with the World's Most Perfect Grandchild (she's now 3) earlier this week. I have noticed that she doesn't play with a lot of her toys. She likes stuffed animals and plastic creatures of the barnyard, but only to act as characters in her narratives.
Mostly the narratives are based on stories we have told her, which in turn are extrapolations of events she has witnessed. (At Costco once, a woman broke a bottle of wine, and a man with a big yellow mop came to clean up the mess, and the Big Yellow Mop became a continuing character in the never-ending story.)
So we were playing on a blanket on the floor of the living room. We had duck and goose, her favorite protagonists. When she tells a story, it tends to wobble quite a bit, with anecdotes left unfinished and motifs repeated. The blanket became, at various times in a 15-minute span, with no help from any adult, an ocean, a nest, a barn, a circus tent, a hollow tree, a schoolroom and the sky.
The changes were instantaneous. I was expected to keep up, and of course I could not. Sometimes we slipped into a story I knew; sometimes we sailed uncharted waters. And somewhere in the middle I realized: WMPG knows that the pieces of reality are fungible.
So here's what I think happens: We are born knowing that "reality" is just a form of interpretation. We then enter an intense period of socialization and propaganda, filled with rules that must not be broken and axioms that are always true. By the time we leave the mill, we really believe in solid ground and knowable personalities.
It's even true, sort of. It's true the way Newton's Laws are true; they work real good right here on earth, but ultimately they are just a piece of the puzzle. After a while, we become aware of the existence of the rest of the puzzle -- and the furniture starts floating.
Maybe that's why grandparents and grandkids get along so famously well --
they are working in the same reality, or the same unreality. We can just go with the flow, and if the ocean of 10 minutes ago has become the bell tower of right now, well, so what? Right now we need a bell tower. Of course it's not a real bell tower, but perhaps even real bell towers are not real towers.
I mean, there are bell towers all over Europe. I cannot at the moment see any of them; I cannot hear their carillons. I would have to be mad to believe in them. But I'm not mad; I'm just crazy.
For instance, this dagger I see before me, its handle toward my hand. Is it real? In the last recorded case, Macbeth vs. Duncan et al., it was not.
Perdita
------
Jon Carroll - March 12, 2004 ©2004 San Francisco Chronicle
A while ago -- it was either during the Clinton administration or the reign of Charles II, they're easy to confuse -- I wrote that most of the people I knew were crazy. Not zany, not weird, not antic: crazy. Their ace in the hole was that they knew that they were crazy.
I myself am pretty much nuts. I understand that reality is at best a tenuous construct. The pieces of everyday life are slowly drifting apart, like furniture in the water after a great ocean liner sinks.
It is not at all clear what's in the gaps. Obsession and compulsion, certainly; the mysteries of the universe; God or somebody like him; death; unexplained washes of color; memory; context; song lyrics. Sometimes it feels as though we are underwater; sometimes it feels as though we are flying.
Seeing the fragility of reality is not a survival skill; when you're in your 20s and 30s, it's just not useful. You gotta believe that the saber- toothed tiger is real, you gotta hold onto the common illusion while your personality is formed. But after a while, you let go, and the subjective nature of perception becomes clear. And who is to say which terrors are real; who is to say which jokes are funny?
I am, of course, capable of acting as though reality were real. Do it all the time. I just have my fingers crossed.
So I was playing with the World's Most Perfect Grandchild (she's now 3) earlier this week. I have noticed that she doesn't play with a lot of her toys. She likes stuffed animals and plastic creatures of the barnyard, but only to act as characters in her narratives.
Mostly the narratives are based on stories we have told her, which in turn are extrapolations of events she has witnessed. (At Costco once, a woman broke a bottle of wine, and a man with a big yellow mop came to clean up the mess, and the Big Yellow Mop became a continuing character in the never-ending story.)
So we were playing on a blanket on the floor of the living room. We had duck and goose, her favorite protagonists. When she tells a story, it tends to wobble quite a bit, with anecdotes left unfinished and motifs repeated. The blanket became, at various times in a 15-minute span, with no help from any adult, an ocean, a nest, a barn, a circus tent, a hollow tree, a schoolroom and the sky.
The changes were instantaneous. I was expected to keep up, and of course I could not. Sometimes we slipped into a story I knew; sometimes we sailed uncharted waters. And somewhere in the middle I realized: WMPG knows that the pieces of reality are fungible.
So here's what I think happens: We are born knowing that "reality" is just a form of interpretation. We then enter an intense period of socialization and propaganda, filled with rules that must not be broken and axioms that are always true. By the time we leave the mill, we really believe in solid ground and knowable personalities.
It's even true, sort of. It's true the way Newton's Laws are true; they work real good right here on earth, but ultimately they are just a piece of the puzzle. After a while, we become aware of the existence of the rest of the puzzle -- and the furniture starts floating.
Maybe that's why grandparents and grandkids get along so famously well --
they are working in the same reality, or the same unreality. We can just go with the flow, and if the ocean of 10 minutes ago has become the bell tower of right now, well, so what? Right now we need a bell tower. Of course it's not a real bell tower, but perhaps even real bell towers are not real towers.
I mean, there are bell towers all over Europe. I cannot at the moment see any of them; I cannot hear their carillons. I would have to be mad to believe in them. But I'm not mad; I'm just crazy.
For instance, this dagger I see before me, its handle toward my hand. Is it real? In the last recorded case, Macbeth vs. Duncan et al., it was not.