FINALLY, Pub Majority leader Eric Cantor gives in on gay marriage

its an issue

that

shouldn't be an issue

I agree, and every good freedom loving capitalist knows cash is the great equalizer. Making a straight persons cash is every bit as valid as a gay persons and once their licence is paid for they should have the ultimate freedom to chose who signs the other side of it...because it's not the state nor anyone else's fucking business.
 
The problem with polygamy is that it's assymetrical. Marriage between two consenting adults makes it easy to make them legally equal. Marriage between tree... not impossible but much trickier.
 
That should also be legal.

Yup..legal consent = government needs to fuck off.

except for the part where it's economic slavery


Bill and Steve marrying will not cause that

Oh bullshit...people who decide to get involved in poly relationships know what they are getting into. This also does not discount the real possibility that it can and has been done in a healthy manner, or that it has to be 1 man with several women. Sometimes it's a mix, though rare some times it's one woman and a few guys.... either way it should be up to the people getting married how they define their marriage, not the state.
 
Yup..legal consent = government needs to fuck off.



Oh bullshit...people who decide to get involved in poly relationships know what they are getting into. This also does not discount the real possibility that it can and has been done in a healthy manner, or that it has to be 1 man with several women. Sometimes it's a mix, though rare some times it's one woman and a few guys.... either way it should be up to the people getting married how they define their marriage, not the state.

a poly relationship is about a billion light years from polygamy... a marriage is a legal contract that places economic resibilities on those involved.. not to mention the financial benefits therin

in almost all of the cases of polygamy in the last 30 years it hass directly involved ther seizure and control of funds and property of the women and child brides.. usually defended under the pretext of religous freedom

these aforementioned religous " freedoms" then have the husbands of these women and children become the official head of home.. all money comes from him and flows to him

there are literally dozens of studies on its harmful affects

the right just wants to trot our the flase equivalnecies till they can eventually bring up bestiality again
 
The problem with polygamy is that it's assymetrical. Marriage between two consenting adults makes it easy to make them legally equal. Marriage between tree... not impossible but much trickier.

^^^^Am I the only one who thought of a pussy willow tree here?^^^^^
 
He said in an interview that in a free country each marriage should be defined by those entering into marriage with each other, not the state. Does this make him pro gay?:confused:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

^^ interview.

Eric motherfucking Cantor is Hiding something; I said it before but every time that asshat is on camera speaking it shows in his face . Watch that mother fucker every time he is on camera' He is just waiting, like a deer in the headlights for somebody to pop him. Bust his bubble.

Christy from Jersey as well, It isn't that he wasn't ready to run in 2012 when his name was tossed about as a contender for the pub nomination ... He got some shit to hide first. I kind of like him after he stood up to the sycophants and ass kissers after SANDY ...but he knows he needs to get his house in order before he jumps into the fire.
 
a poly relationship is about a billion light years from polygamy... a marriage is a legal contract that places economic resibilities on those involved.. not to mention the financial benefits therin

No it's not...multiple people, only diff is one is one man with many women and the other is multiple men and women. The economic responsibilities are to be determined by the two entering in said contract.

in almost all of the cases of polygamy in the last 30 years it hass directly involved ther seizure and control of funds and property of the women and child brides.. usually defended under the pretext of religous freedom these aforementioned religous " freedoms" then have the husbands of these women and children become the official head of home.. all money comes from him and flows to him

1) kids don't have economic rights anywhere except the ones mom and dad give them.

2)The women have no excuse...they are fucking adults and if they choose to enter a relationship on the grounds that she give him all her money then tough shit for her, she should be so fucking retarded. Children..why not just make it illegal to marry kids? Holy fuck problem solved....no more excuses for anyone.

there are literally dozens of studies on its harmful affects

Yea...ANY family can be abusive and negative, doesn't mean they all are.

the right just wants to trot our the flase equivalnecies till they can eventually bring up bestiality again

No doubt... still doesn't change the fact that the whole "Freedom! Liberty!" flag waving on the right wing is a huge pile of shit because they want to use big gov to exert their ideas on others.
 
Eric motherfucking Cantor is Hiding something; I said it before but every time that asshat is on camera speaking it shows in his face . Watch that mother fucker every time he is on camera' He is just waiting, like a deer in the headlights for somebody to pop him. Bust his bubble.

Christy from Jersey as well, It isn't that he wasn't ready to run in 2012 when his name was tossed about as a contender for the pub nomination ... He got some shit to hide first. I kind of like him after he stood up to the sycophants and ass kissers after SANDY ...but he knows he needs to get his house in order before he jumps into the fire.

Christie didn't run because he knew he would lose.
 
No it's not...multiple people, only diff is one is one man with many women and the other is multiple men and women. The economic responsibilities are to be determined by the two entering in said contract.



1) kids don't have economic rights anywhere except the ones mom and dad give them.

2)The women have no excuse...they are fucking adults and if they choose to enter a relationship on the grounds that she give him all her money then tough shit for her, she should be so fucking retarded. Children..why not just make it illegal to marry kids? Holy fuck problem solved....no more excuses for anyone.



Yea...ANY family can be abusive and negative, doesn't mean they all are.



No doubt... still doesn't change the fact that the whole "Freedom! Liberty!" flag waving on the right wing is a huge pile of shit because they want to use big gov to exert their ideas on others.



don't get me wrong I agree with many of your posts... but the good majority of polygamous relationships out there ARE with children..that's why I keep bringing them up

here is an of how well polygamy works out in the real world

http://www.biblebelievers.net/cults/mormonism/womenofmormonism/kjcwom8.htm


this site is a great source for those that think polygamy is such a wonderful idea:


http://polygamyandtrafficking.com/


as for women being retarded

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...es-women-worse-off-court-told/article1320027/

marrying children is illegal, but it still happens... it's called religous freedom..read the above links

polygamy sounds like a good idea to those who want polyamory legally and equitably


that just never comes to fruition in reality


two guys marrying will not cause any of this bullshit
 
He said in an interview that in a free country each marriage should be defined by those entering into marriage with each other, not the state. Does this make him pro gay?:confused:

Does making sense make you gay?

Marriage is a contract between two consenting adults and has fuck all to do with the government.
 
Does making sense make you gay?

Marriage is a contract between two consenting adults and has fuck all to do with the government.

Actually, it does. It changes your relationship with the government.
 
A guy comes to your country, marries a chick to get citizenship, then divorces her the first chance he gets..... this is okay

two guys who have lived in your nation since birth want to get married...this is not cool
 
Christie didn't run because he knew he would lose.
I think all the flak he took from the right because his Sandy/Obama thing may be a game changer for him...May make him more acceptable to Independents.???

At least I think better of him now than before...

that could change.
 
Back
Top