LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/20...adele_finds_purpose_in_motherhood_376472.html
http://www.dailywire.com/news/3450/feminists-are-very-upset-adele-heres-why-amanda-prestigiacomo
But now let's make this thread all about me again so we can avoid discussing the fact that feminists hate giving women agency.
In late November, The New York Times pushed out a tweet about Adele that described her as a “27-year-old mother.” Readers just about lost their minds, viewing it as particularly insulting and condescending clickbait. Which it was. But the responses, such as “WTF does motherhood have to do with it?” and “Lazy, patronising, sexist way to describe” were oddly hostile as well. Now, Adele has disappointed feminists by telling an interviewer that she has found her purpose in motherhood. “When I became a parent, I felt like I was truly living. I had a purpose, where before I didn’t,” she says.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/3450/feminists-are-very-upset-adele-heres-why-amanda-prestigiacomo
“When I became a parent, I felt like I was truly living. I had a purpose, where before I didn’t,” Adele told Vogue.
This simple statement set feminists off. Two overtly liberal outlets, the Daily Mirror and Slate, openly struggled with the idea that a celebrity—someone who was supposed to be on their not-so-covert motherhood-hating feminist side—could actually find purpose in motherhood.
Slate stunningly tweeted, “Uh oh: Adele tells Vogue motherhood gave her ‘purpose," as if this was some sort of crime.
The Daily Mirror’s tweet demonstrated their shock over her admission, as well: “Adele stuns for Vogue and admits having her son gave her 'purpose.’”
But now let's make this thread all about me again so we can avoid discussing the fact that feminists hate giving women agency.