Fem-Lust?

And there's a certain condescending tone to it. I would never go for someone who wants to 'fill up my nest.' :rolleyes: The whole "Oh, I'm feeling faint because you have such a huge penis and can give me babies" thing is a stuck up a male fantasy all over again. Strong, smart women in control of their sexuality would have a bit of a problem with it.

You flatter yourself thinking your attitude is the majority report. Look at it another way: If my tales average 2.50 approval then half my readers agree with me, if my average score is 3.75 then 75% of my readers agree with me. I operate from the premise, THE MEANING OF ANYTHING IS THE RESULTS YOU GET, and what I write is the fruit of my experiences with females. Women fuck their boss for minimum wage or fuck their boss for a whole lot more, but they all fuck their bosses.
 
You flatter yourself thinking your attitude is the majority report.
I never said I think it's the majority report. But what you're reporting is not 'female lust'. It's a 'female I-want-to-fall-at-your-feet male fantasy', and for the purposes of this thread and JackLuis's research, a bit irrelevant.
 
I never said I think it's the majority report. But what you're reporting is not 'female lust'. It's a 'female I-want-to-fall-at-your-feet male fantasy', and for the purposes of this thread and JackLuis's research, a bit irrelevant.

Each of us form opinions based on our funds of knowlege and experiences, and the odds our statistical calculus extracts from the data, ie, prediction fitness. The eagle doesnt have to snare every fish or rabbit, but he must catch enough.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3sdOvfVDhA

He wrote this for you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
While I haven't exhausted the list yet, I have read a lot of women's fiction here on Lit. Some of it was very romantic, enough to make my eyes leak and make me cheer the endings. Some was, for me, strange and grotesque, but other than the difference in emotional attachment, not much different that men's writing.

I wouldn't say that I have reached any conclusions, nor have I finished my research.

I do need to finish up emaps Longwood series. Now that I have finished the first chapter I have too much time invested to not continue my 'research', besides I like raunchy westerns.:)

One of the comments I've gotten was that the reader can 'see' the story due to the way described the facial clues and such. I tried to find the comment so I could quote it, but alas, it's buried.

That one comment makes me think I should look at what I'm doing right and amplify that rather than worry about what I'm doing wrong.

I do need to read some more Lesbian stories, although I don't write for Lesbians and will probably get blasted for mine, I have a 'sub-plot' that should work out.

Back to Longwood.:)
 
emap:
Finally finished Adventure in Longwood, whew!

I went back to your Submissions page and found you have two more novels of it! I'll pass them for now, the dialect and little attribution in the dialog made it hard to read and understand who's talking.

A good story in there, fast paced and action filled. The sex was wham, bam in description despite Janet seeing stars several times, two or three paragraphs is not erotic, just descriptive.

I'll try "Just a Blowjob," that should be a bit shorter. :D
 
OMG I just escaped from the GB. I don't know what came over me to argue with Vettman but...*cries*

I was wrong! :eek::eek::eek::eek:

(To argue with a fool)

Better to stay up here where I can control my blood pressure.

Now where was that Blowjob story?

Ahhh Much better. ;)

"Getting my hand onto him just in time, he shoves hard, his cock trembling and pulsing in my mouth. I feel the hot fluid flooding my mouth, spreading out as more and more is first shoved then flows. Teeth swimming in a sea of the tangy hot juices, my tongue darting around and around his head, I pull back until just the end of him is still captured."

What's wrong with male fantasy?
 
Last edited:
OMG I just escaped from the GB. I don't know what came over me to argue with Vettman but...*cries*

I was wrong! :eek::eek::eek::eek:

(To argue with a fool)

Better to stay up here where I can control my blood pressure.

Now where was that Blowjob story?

Ahhh Much better. ;)

"Getting my hand onto him just in time, he shoves hard, his cock trembling and pulsing in my mouth. I feel the hot fluid flooding my mouth, spreading out as more and more is first shoved then flows. Teeth swimming in a sea of the tangy hot juices, my tongue darting around and around his head, I pull back until just the end of him is still captured."

What's wrong with male fantasy?

LOL I'm only beginning to realize that GB is not a healthy place to be.
 
LOL I'm only beginning to realize that GB is not a healthy place to be.

Unfortunately true, none of them actually reads our stories. I think they are so caught up arguing with each other, or agreeing with the RWCJ press, that they don't realize that while they are still in the basement, their mothers moved months ago. :eek:
 
Unfortunately true, none of them actually reads our stories. I think they are so caught up arguing with each other, or agreeing with the RWCJ press, that they don't realize that while they are still in the basement, their mothers moved months ago. :eek:

But Jack, there are only nine actual people there and three are visiting. :eek:
 
LOL I'm only beginning to realize that GB is not a healthy place to be.

Why waste time arguing politics on a sex site?? I have never figured that one out. I guess some folks have to frame everything in a political light. So boring and pointless. Its clearly better to just have sex with lusty people and enjoy the company.
 
Nothing wrong with male fantasy but you didn't want to learn about male fantasy. Pretty sure since you have male fantasies anyway. ;)

Didn't mean to make Longwood confusing, though you are the only one to say so. Odd thing there. :confused: I guess maybe it's how I worded it, the whole thing is done as close to how it was said then as I could get it and still be English, when it is an English section and I translated the not. Also means the sex isn't really sex, or at least not porn sex like you find in here.

Pitfall of wording everything the way it would have been said then I suppose. :(

Just a Blowjob was a try it out thingy. See if I can do a full story with nothing but a blowjob. You would not beleive how hard that is, need 750 words and it's all on a blowjob. Well not entirely I had to mention a little of other things just to have 750 words, ended up having 762 I think it was. Just sex is a little easier, can describe the feeling of him sliding in inch by glorious inch and you have 300 words right there. :cool:

I wander into GB on occassion, some of the threads are funny. Not meant to be I think but I find them funny. Never go there if you want to discuss much of anything and I don't get why people argue politics anyway. Doesn't matter what you think, enough of the population believes exactly what the bought and paid for three or four times over Congressman says. Thinking about politics won't do anything except make you mad and who wants to do that? :rolleyes:
 
Nothing wrong with male fantasy but you didn't want to learn about male fantasy. Pretty sure since you have male fantasies anyway. ;)

_ Thinking about politics won't do anything except make you mad and who wants to do that? :rolleyes:

On Longwood, the saying was in character, but it would have been better with more attributions, Janet said, Sheriff said, ect. It broke my rhythm having the figure out who was saying what, but I may have been distracted too.
Just a Blowjob was well done and I know what you mean about stretching a blowjob to 750 words, particularly in first person. I find cunny a more lucrative field to labor in. Even in first person I can get 800 words out of one. :)

Yes politics is a tricky subject. Yet we are bombarded with it and it has always had an direct impact on my life, because I depended on the Federal Markets for my livelihood, so it's hard to ignore. Sometimes I just like to poke the trolls though. :D
 
Back
Top