Feedbacks went wrong

[naughtyrusguy]

I'm a russian guy and I'm surprised to read some feedbacks of anonimous users. Maybe my way of thinkings differs from the american one but why the users are shocked with the themes like boyfriends watching their girlfriends getting fucked. Or shocked by the sizes of cocks. Like 10-inchers of the black guys are something fantastic and impossible. My size is about 9 inches and I don't think it's huge.
So the boyfriends watching their girlfriends get fucked is so disgusting but incest is so awesome for the number of the users. I'm really shocked with it.

 

[LucilleCF]

Welcome to the internet.

 

[A_Little_Show]

Maybe my way of thinkings differs from the american one ...

I don't think it is a cultural difference between Americans and Russians. The "Hot Wife" and "Hot Girlfriend" fantasies of watching your lover getting fucked by someone else seem to be universal. A ten inch penis is larger than 99 percent of penices, but these stories are fantasy. You can have a meter long penis if you want.

I have received a lot of negative feedback over the years. I can often tell the reader didn't even read the story. I think some people like to say nasty things for their own reasons. I don't think it has much to do with the actual story content or quality in many cases.

I have had the good fortune to work with many Russians for many years. I think Russians and Americans have more cultural similarities that French and Americans or Italians and Americans.

 

[MelissaBaby]

You can have a meter long penis if you want.

Making a note of that...

 

[KeithD]

Your comprehension problem might start at not thinking that nine inches is huge. By all international standards (and the Russian standard isn't "up there." Russia's not in the top 10 and the top 10th average, Sudan, is 6.4 inches), nine inches is huge.

 

[MelissaBaby]

Your comprehension problem might start at not thinking that nine inches is huge. By all international standards (and the Russian standard isn't "up there." Russia's not in the top 10 and the top 10th average, Sudan, is 6.4 inches), nine inches is huge.

#1?

Detroit.

 

[Inkhorn]

Different strokes for different folks, as they say. Never pay much attention to anonymous criticisms, though. Negative comments from anonymous people don’t carry as much weight as those from other authors do.

And... there are guys who actually measure themselves?? I thought that was just a sort of literary device or whatever for erotica. I’m in my late 40s and I’ve never bothered.

 

[KeithD]

#1?

Detroit.

If there's a section of Detroit called The Congo (7.1 inches).

 

[ElectricBlue]

And... there are guys who actually measure themselves?? I thought that was just a sort of literary device or whatever for erotica. I’m in my late 40s and I’ve never bothered.

I suspect most teenagers did at one time another, and I doubt many men don't know precisely where they sit on the league tables. That's why there's little discussion on the topic, generally speaking, because mathematically the white male average is just shy of six inches and most smut writers are probably white males.

If you're just shy of eight inches erect, you're a one-percenter. It's like knowing your Meyer-Briggs indicators - once you know, it doesn't change .

 

[KeithD]

It's like knowing your Meyer-Briggs indicators - once you know, it doesn't change .

I took the M-B three times. Different results each time. Each time it adhered to what was needed in the specific job I was in at the time.

 

[ElectricBlue]

I took the M-B three times. Different results each time. Each time it adhered to what was needed in the specific job I was in at the time.

Dramatically different, or just the second two? I'm always hard over IN, but fluctuate TP, TJ depending on the level of management I was in at the time (using the more complex questionnaires with 500 plus questions and response times factored in, with an IQ scrub bolted on at the side).

The theory of MB is that it should assess your core personality - if it can be steered because of a specific job set, then that's a bit pointless, or you're a psychopath.

Narcissist, you've told us, but I didn't have you down as a psychopath .

Mind you, I did go in and do the Scientologist quiz one night years ago, when I was in another city and bored - it's the same as a MB but with a tin can, and every question is skewed so that you're scored as completely fucked in the head by the double negative questions and answers. After steering that one, then flirting with the sad, lonely girl for half an hour, they offered me a job. "You're really good at this psychology stuff," they said. I laughed. I should have asked her out on a date - she'd told me more about herself than she ever found out about me.

 

[Bramblethorn]

Dramatically different, or just the second two? I'm always hard over IN, but fluctuate TP, TJ depending on the level of management I was in at the time (using the more complex questionnaires with 500 plus questions and response times factored in, with an IQ scrub bolted on at the side).

The theory of MB is that it should assess your core personality - if it can be steered because of a specific job set, then that's a bit pointless, or you're a psychopath.

This is a big part of why a lot of psychologists consider MBTI to be snake-oil. It is known to have poor test-retest reliability - if you test a group of people, and then test them again five weeks later, roughly half of them will change "type".

 

[ElectricBlue]

This is a big part of why a lot of psychologists consider MBTI to be snake-oil. It is known to have poor test-retest reliability

That's why I mention the more sophisticated profilers, with 500 plus questions, measured response times, forced unfavoured responses, that kind of thing. If you go into them not trying to game them, I think there is a degree of consistency - if they're well designed in the first place. If all you want to do is game them, then the tests are a waste of time, but if you want to take home something useful, they can have value.

With me, for example, I discovered (not just from simple MBTI though) that I have several "one percenter" psych attributes that I didn't know I had. That helped on those occasions where I used to think, "surely every body thinks like this, what is wrong with you?" only to find that 99% of the population didn't think like that at all. So in my head I'm right, and there's a whole bunch of folk out there who are off the wall .

 

[BelleCanzuto]

This is a big part of why a lot of psychologists consider MBTI to be snake-oil. It is known to have poor test-retest reliability

- if you test a group of people, and then test them again five weeks later, roughly half of them will change "type".[/QUOTE]

Thanks, Bramblethorn, I was just about to post something along those lines.
There's this too:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-leadership/myers-briggs-does-it-pay-to-know-your-type/2012/12/14/eaed51ae-3fcc-11e2-bca3-aadc9b7e29c5_story.html

MBTI is their framework for classifying personality types along four distinct axes: introversion vs. extroversion, sensing vs. intuition, thinking vs. feeling and judging vs. perceiving. A person, according to their hypothesis, has one dominant preference in each of the four pairs. For example, he might be introverted, a sensor, a thinker and a perceiver. Or, in Myers-Briggs shorthand, an “ISTP.”

Everyone, they posited, fits one of the 16 possible combinations.

It's a classic case of forcing data to fit a conclusion, rather than gathering data and drawing conclusions from it. Also, it's based on psychoanalytic theory, which has its own fundamental problems.

 

[BelleCanzuto]

EB wrote:

That's why I mention the more sophisticated profilers, with 500 plus questions, measured response times, forced unfavoured responses, that kind of thing.

That sounds more like the MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory) which is a validated and standardized psychological screening. And was developed in a whole different way than some person sitting in their kitchen trying to write questions to elicit certain answers.

 

[Jada59]

Which story or stories are you referring to? I see that you have one story, but I don't see any feedback on it. I did try to read the first page, but couldn't bring myself to read more. Then story seemed to have potential but it just didn't do it for me because of the way it was written. That could be a matter of English not being your native language though.

 

[Jada59]

I suspect most teenagers did at one time another, and I doubt many men don't know precisely where they sit on the league tables. That's why there's little discussion on the topic, generally speaking, because mathematically the white male average is just shy of six inches and most smut writers are probably white males.

If you're just shy of eight inches erect, you're a one-percenter. It's like knowing your Meyer-Briggs indicators - once you know, it doesn't change .

I've had guys ask me about what the biggest cock was that I've had. I never measured and all seemed to be about the same size. My ex husband might have been slightly smaller but he was also pretty short.

He annoyed me because he kept commenting that he thought his cock was too small. Rather a mood killer for me. So.. I put a tape measure by my bed and whipped it out one night. He never said that again!

 

[ElectricBlue]

That sounds more like the MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory) which is a validated and standardized psychological screening. And was developed in a whole different way than some person sitting in their kitchen trying to write questions to elicit certain answers.

Possibly one of them - I've done three of the very clever ones over the last twenty years, all different, but all along the same lines - paired questions forcing agree or disagree responses, the same questions turning up later in a different pairing where the primary choice is reversed.

The results were fairly accurate against my own sense of self, and I think people who know me very well would agree. Those who know me only from a management environment never understand the introvert vs extrovert bit (after sucking the life out of me).

 

[ElectricBlue]

-It's a classic case of forcing data to fit a conclusion, rather than gathering data and drawing conclusions from it. Also, it's based on psychoanalytic theory, which has its own fundamental problems.

Hey, don't bring my mother into this .

Actually, Jung makes more sense in my case, judging by the archetypes and twinning pairs I keep on writing.

 

[MichaelGH]

How come every one’s always talking about how much hate they get for writing “other guy fucks wife” stories and the one time I try writing one specifically to piss off the trolls they ignore it and the people who are into cuckold stories actually like it?

 

[bushyTrail]

This is a big part of why a lot of psychologists consider MBTI to be snake-oil. It is known to have poor test-retest reliability

- if you test a group of people, and then test them again five weeks later, roughly half of them will change "type".[/QUOTE]

Finally someone acknowledging this! Lately everybody seems to be obsessed with categorizing their personality...

However, I would like to point out that there is another known bias about classifications in general. In an experiment researchers gave people a fake personality test and returned to everybody the same result, which did not contain strong connotations like "introvert". Afterwards, most of them was satisfied with the result, claiming that it captured their personality very well. Basically, it's a confirmation bias: you consider only the parts of the test that correspond to behaviors you had in the past and vice-versa. This is one of the reasons why astrologically-determined personality descriptions are so popular, for instance.

 

[Jada59]

How come every one’s always talking about how much hate they get for writing “other guy fucks wife” stories and the one time I try writing one specifically to piss off the trolls they ignore it and the people who are into cuckold stories actually like it?

Uh... I think people who are into a specific genre are going to like the story, even if badly written. I'm not implying that yours is badly written. I didn't read it so don't know.

 

[MichaelGH]

Uh... I think people who are into a specific genre are going to like the story, even if badly written. I'm not implying that yours is badly written. I didn't read it so don't know.

But why did the trolls ignore it? WHY?!? I need their hate to live! If I don’t get it I’ll surely die!

 

[Bramblethorn]

With me, for example, I discovered (not just from simple MBTI though) that I have several "one percenter" psych attributes that I didn't know I had. That helped on those occasions where I used to think, "surely every body thinks like this, what is wrong with you?" only to find that 99% of the population didn't think like that at all. So in my head I'm right, and there's a whole bunch of folk out there who are off the wall .

I learned that lesson somewhere around third grade, when I was the kid who liked to spend lunchtimes in the classroom reading on my own...

Archetypes are enduringly popular, whether it's "four humors" and more complex derivatives (astrology, Tarot), MBTI/DISC/etc., or a Which Harry Potter Character Are You? Buzzfeed quiz.

I think they can be useful thinking tools for structuring analyses like "are there other ways of looking at this?" and reminding people that not everybody else thinks the same way or has the same priority, as you say. But they become harmful when used for pigeonholing and prediction.

MBTI, for instance - I test as an extreme "I", which is pretty accurate as a generalisation. But there are some classic "E" things that I can do very well, if I have time to prepare and space afterwards to decompress. Treating MBTI as a tool for classifying/predicting people's capabilities overlooks the capability for flexibility.

However, I would like to point out that there is another known bias about classifications in general. In an experiment researchers gave people a fake personality test and returned to everybody the same result, which did not contain strong connotations like "introvert". Afterwards, most of them was satisfied with the result, claiming that it captured their personality very well. Basically, it's a confirmation bias: you consider only the parts of the test that correspond to behaviors you had in the past and vice-versa. This is one of the reasons why astrologically-determined personality descriptions are so popular, for instance.

Yep! This is known as the "Barnum effect" or "Forer effect".

 

[bushyTrail]

Yep! This is known as the "Barnum effect" or "Forer effect".

Thanks for the link, I've been trying to find my source, to no avail.