FDA Says It Needs Until Year 2076 To Reveal Data Pertaining To Pfizer Vaccine Approva

[AlterErgo]

FDA Says It Needs Until Year 2076 To Reveal Data Pertaining To Pfizer Vaccine Approval


Yup

Its

SAFE



https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...taining-to-pfizer-vaccine-approval/ar-AAQSOWp

 

[JohnnySavage]

I'll be 113.

I've always planned on living that long because I want to be on tv telling everyone what the bicentennial was like.

 

[ll74]

We can expedite it by hiring more FDA desk workers....300k+ documents take a while

 

[AlterErgo]

We can expedite it by hiring more FDA desk workers....300k+ documents take a while

so they DONT have resources to LOOK THRU papers?

but they do have enough RESOURCES to certify its OK and WORKS and NO SIDE EFFECTS?


really?

 

[ll74]

so they DONT have resources to LOOK THRU papers?

but they do have enough RESOURCES to certify its OK and WORKS and NO SIDE EFFECTS?


really?

Lmao....because HR does the same thing as Operations does the same thing as Project Management

They can't just turn shit over, they have privacy to account for which needs to addressed for every piece of paper.

 

[Rightguide]

I hope the judge tells them they have two weeks.

 

[JohnnySavage]

Government workers.

C students from lower tier colleges.

It begs the question as to how those documents were reviewed in less than four months in order to approve the vaccine.

 

[ShyBiGuy954]

https://64.media.tumblr.com/b407847d28d5947b3254b57f817ff9d5/a4723f1e861fb6b9-22/s1280x1920/48feb4862ffdba1040d07b96cf965ec953d8f071.jpg

 

[ll74]

Government workers.

C students from lower tier colleges.

It begs the question as to how those documents were reviewed in less than four months in order to approve the vaccine.

They didn't have to review them to remove confidential information.....they looked at specific adverse effects and results

Scientists reviewing scientific information != Lawyers reviewing legality of info to turn over to the public

 

[JohnnySavage]

Not really important, but lawyers don't generally review the documents. Every agency has a FOIA office and the FOIA is very specific about what can be redacted or withheld. Complying with a FOIA request is ministerial. They could very easily bring in an army of GS-7's and post the rules on a big poster board.

 

[LittleDixie]

So, they can approve all of those pages of data in months, but they'll need decades to actually go through them?

They are slow walking it on purpose and they should be held accountable for this.

 

[Goldenfinger]

I'll be 113.

I've always planned on living that long because I want to be on tv telling everyone what the bicentennial was like.

Tricentennial, bicentennial was 1976

 

[AlterErgo]

fraud...fauci

 

[ll74]

Not really important, but lawyers don't generally review the documents. Every agency has a FOIA office and the FOIA is very specific about what can be redacted or withheld. Complying with a FOIA request is ministerial. They could very easily bring in an army of GS-7's and post the rules on a big poster board.

Some sort of personal information reviewer does review every page. Those people haven't reviewed anything outside of making sure access is taken care of. What they are basically telling the courts is that they don't have the resource to provide the documents quickly. I'm sure the timing is over exaggerated, because they've never had to provide docs on that scale and they just extrapolated based on past requests (if there are any)