shadowsource
A Flash In The Pain
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2001
- Posts
- 1,664
What...?
I just posted all that stuff because I thought Judicial Watch was a damned lousy source, and I marked the socialist one as such, but noted that it seemed accurate and readable. I knew about Daddy Bush's scented lobbying months ago, and I don't think it's any better an idea today than I thought it was then. I've grown accustomed to presidential relatives embarrassing the Prez (from Donald Nixon to Bush's S&L crook son/brother to Roger Clinton and Billy Carter), but I don't really expect ex-presidents to act like this.
That said, I was trying to point out - and some of you conservatives don't seem to have gotten the point - that the bin Laden company is highly respected (eh, so is Prudential and MetLife, and they fleece old folks in great numbers every five years). I hope the FBI is looking to see if any siblings are passing off to the bugger, but of course we can't ban this huge company any more than we can ban EarthLink because one of its founding board members got busted in the biggest Ponzi scheme in history and fleeced the chairman and thousands of other fellow Scientologists in the process. Calm down.
I do think the Caryle Group merits scrutiny by people who read.
As for encouraging the flaky individual who started this thread, who cares? I see that if KR sneezes, the thread dribbles on for days. If I see a good discussion brewing, I'll try to add a few pennies of consideration. WD can tell you that I confirmed his "flag burning teacher" thread a couple of days ago; I checked to see what the best local paper would have said, and I would certainly have posted if it said the story was fake, so I posted that it was true. This actually is a more important subject, even if the messenger is defective.
I just posted all that stuff because I thought Judicial Watch was a damned lousy source, and I marked the socialist one as such, but noted that it seemed accurate and readable. I knew about Daddy Bush's scented lobbying months ago, and I don't think it's any better an idea today than I thought it was then. I've grown accustomed to presidential relatives embarrassing the Prez (from Donald Nixon to Bush's S&L crook son/brother to Roger Clinton and Billy Carter), but I don't really expect ex-presidents to act like this.
That said, I was trying to point out - and some of you conservatives don't seem to have gotten the point - that the bin Laden company is highly respected (eh, so is Prudential and MetLife, and they fleece old folks in great numbers every five years). I hope the FBI is looking to see if any siblings are passing off to the bugger, but of course we can't ban this huge company any more than we can ban EarthLink because one of its founding board members got busted in the biggest Ponzi scheme in history and fleeced the chairman and thousands of other fellow Scientologists in the process. Calm down.
I do think the Caryle Group merits scrutiny by people who read.
As for encouraging the flaky individual who started this thread, who cares? I see that if KR sneezes, the thread dribbles on for days. If I see a good discussion brewing, I'll try to add a few pennies of consideration. WD can tell you that I confirmed his "flag burning teacher" thread a couple of days ago; I checked to see what the best local paper would have said, and I would certainly have posted if it said the story was fake, so I posted that it was true. This actually is a more important subject, even if the messenger is defective.