Far from being the terrorists of the world, the Islamic peoples have been its victims

indianbadazz

Virgin
Joined
Sep 13, 2001
Posts
11
This is an article written by John Pilger, a well known journalist who has more than 40 years of experience in the field.
I have been posting threads regularly trying to get a response from people about the ongoing crisis in America.It probably isnt a crisis faced only by the US. It affects each and every individual on the face of this earth and we need to wipe out terrorism completely. But in trying to do so are we committing acts which could be equated with other forms of terrorism.

Here's the article:

John Pilger :13 Sep 2001
http://http://pilger.carlton.com/print/77937
If the attacks on America have their source in the Islamic world, who can be surprised?
Two days earlier, eight people were killed in southern Iraq when British and American planes bombed civilian areas. Not a word appeared in the
mainstream media. An estimated 200,000 Iraqis, according to the Health Education Trust, died during and in the immediate aftermath of the slaughter known as the Gulf war. This was never news that touched public consciousness in the west. At least a million civilians, half of them children, have since died in Iraq as a result of a medieval embargo imposed by the United States and Britain. In Pakistan and Afghanistan, the mujahedin, which gave birth to the fanatical
Taliban, was largely the creation of the Central Intelligence Agency; the terrorist training camps where Osama Bin Laden, "America's most wanted man", allegedly planned his attacks, were built with American money and backing. In Palestine,
the enduring illegal occupation by Israel would have collapsed long ago were it not for American backing.

Far from being the terrorists of the world, the Islamic peoples have been its victims - that is, the victims of American fundamentalism, whose power, in all its forms, military, strategic and economic, is the greatest source of terrorism on
earth. This fact is largely censored from the western media. That Tony Blair,whose government sells lethal weapons to Israel and has sprayed Iraq and Yugoslavia with cluster bombs and depleted uranium and was the greatest arms
supplier to the genocidists in Indonesia, can be taken seriously when he now speaks about the "shame" of the "new evil of mass terrorism" says much about the censorship of our collective sense of how the world is managed. One of Blair's favourite words - fatuous - comes to mind. Alas, it is no comfort to the families of the thousands of ordinary Americans who have died so terribly that the perpetrators of their suffering may be the product of western policies.
 
Re: Far from being the terrorists of the world, the Islamic peoples have been its victims

indianbadazz said:
Tony Blair,whose government sells lethal weapons to Israel and has sprayed Iraq and Yugoslavia with cluster bombs and depleted uranium
on behalf of Muslims in Kosovo.

I related to your earlier posts, but you're careening off the track. The Middle East suffers from horrible leadership, including that of the PLO. The US has contributed to many wrongs, but not all of them, by any conceivable measure. Do you think that Iraq should be treated in a totally normal fashion by other nations? Do you wish Saddam Hussein had been overthrown by the Allies in '91? Do you think he should have kept Kuwait? Was he correct in invading Iran? Was it permissible for him to nerve gas Kurdish Iraqi citizens? What do YOU think?
 
indianbadazz said:
Far from being the terrorists of the world, the Islamic peoples have been its victims - that is, the victims of American fundamentalism, whose power, in all its forms, military, strategic and economic, is the greatest source of terrorism on
earth. This fact is largely censored from the western media.

I added the italic emphasis.
What makes anyone think that any media outlet is any more truthful than the others? Oh, just because it is not from "the west"? Bullshit. IMO, all print, television, and radio news is carefully selected to fulfill the owner's biases and agendas, whether it be state controlled or privately owned.

For example, Iraqi TV frequently claims that they have shot down U.S. and UK planes over their air space. Yet I see no acknowledgement of the Iraqi claims from U.S. or UK sources. So who's telling the truth? I don't think we'll ever really know the truth.
 
yes -

The French press, which can be very forthright about the stupidities of Washington, lies hilariously about France's doings in Africa. The Economist, a fabulous newsmagazine whose editors I've lunched with long ago, is historically lame on the Northern Irish question, and has frequently descended badly in discussing it. The US press, representing such a busy empire, is full of shit about many, many places. But often the truth will be mentioned here once, or twice, and then buried. That's why people who don't follow these things closely wind up running with the pack.
 
Yeah, that would be me. Not following political doings closely. It depresses me, and makes me feel badly about the human race. I prefer to keep my idealism intact, thank you. Honesty and plain dealing don't seem to have a place in the political realm. So I bow out and continue running around frantically trying to keep up on the things that do interest me. Like conspiracy theories. ;) Naw, it's just that, where do you find the time to follow all these things going on? After doing all the things of ones daily life, where is the time for that?

Aww, never mind. Shutting up now. :)
 
Back
Top