JamesSD
Back, at least for now?
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2004
- Posts
- 2,461
Or, how much realism is too much? In erotica, is it ok to suspend the reader's belief a little for the sake of eroticism?
There's no easy answer to this issue, and I think every reader will have their own preferences. Lately I've been butting up a little against the whole "is this realistic?" in my erotic writing, followed by "should I even worry?"
My stories slant heavily towards feasible but improbable. I write mostly MF erotic couplings and MFF threesome stories. The women in my stories are far more bisexual and far less jealous of sharing a man with another woman than most real women would be. My characters, like the residents of Lake Wobegon, are as a whole quite above average in the looks department. No one has any STDs, no pregnancy scares, no dryness issues, people are rarely too tired/cranky/sick/bloated for sex.
The women in my stories tend to be more sex driven and less relationship driven than most women I've encountered in my life have been. One Night stands are downright commonplace in my story universe, and threesomes and female bisexuality, while interesting, are hardly taboo.
Basically, my stories COULD happen in the real world, but most would take the alignment of a series of moderately probable to only slightly probable events to actually happen. At some level this concerns me. Yet, on another level, I don't want erotic stories to focus on mundane, unsexy details of life.
As a reader, I know that I often prefer slightly less realistic stories. The best comparison I can make is to mainstream cinema. The actors are more attractive than "normal" people, speak more clearly and more cleverly, and many movie plots rely on coincidental or fortuitous events to make the plot work. Yet, many of these movies are enjoyable. Is erotic fiction any different?
Avoiding a "stroke vs. story" question (I personally like Stroke, but with a story), how much realism is ideal? How off-putting do you think it is to have characters who are uninhibited, whose dialog, while clear, isn't totally natural? In your erotica, do you actually want details that increase realism, but might ruin the erotic mood of a scene? Examples would be things like a man noticing a pimple on his partner's ass while he does them from behind, a mildly funky body odor, or two people who screw more like amateurs than experts.
(I didn't find any other threads on this subject, I apologize if there is one and I just missed it with my search terms)
Opinons?
There's no easy answer to this issue, and I think every reader will have their own preferences. Lately I've been butting up a little against the whole "is this realistic?" in my erotic writing, followed by "should I even worry?"
My stories slant heavily towards feasible but improbable. I write mostly MF erotic couplings and MFF threesome stories. The women in my stories are far more bisexual and far less jealous of sharing a man with another woman than most real women would be. My characters, like the residents of Lake Wobegon, are as a whole quite above average in the looks department. No one has any STDs, no pregnancy scares, no dryness issues, people are rarely too tired/cranky/sick/bloated for sex.
The women in my stories tend to be more sex driven and less relationship driven than most women I've encountered in my life have been. One Night stands are downright commonplace in my story universe, and threesomes and female bisexuality, while interesting, are hardly taboo.
Basically, my stories COULD happen in the real world, but most would take the alignment of a series of moderately probable to only slightly probable events to actually happen. At some level this concerns me. Yet, on another level, I don't want erotic stories to focus on mundane, unsexy details of life.
As a reader, I know that I often prefer slightly less realistic stories. The best comparison I can make is to mainstream cinema. The actors are more attractive than "normal" people, speak more clearly and more cleverly, and many movie plots rely on coincidental or fortuitous events to make the plot work. Yet, many of these movies are enjoyable. Is erotic fiction any different?
Avoiding a "stroke vs. story" question (I personally like Stroke, but with a story), how much realism is ideal? How off-putting do you think it is to have characters who are uninhibited, whose dialog, while clear, isn't totally natural? In your erotica, do you actually want details that increase realism, but might ruin the erotic mood of a scene? Examples would be things like a man noticing a pimple on his partner's ass while he does them from behind, a mildly funky body odor, or two people who screw more like amateurs than experts.
(I didn't find any other threads on this subject, I apologize if there is one and I just missed it with my search terms)
Opinons?