Families suspect SEAL Team 6 crash was inside job on worst day in Afghanistan

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
Families suspect SEAL Team 6 crash was inside job on worst day in Afghanistan





Questions haunt the families of Extortion 17, the 2011 helicopter mission in Afghanistan that suffered the most U.S. military deaths in a single day in the war on terrorism.

Every day, Charlie Strange, the father of one of the 30 Americans who died Aug. 6, 2011, in the flash of a rocket-propelled grenade, asks himself whether his son, Michael, was set up by someone inside the Afghan government wanting revenge on Osama bin Laden’s killers — SEAL Team 6.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


“Somebody was leaking to the Taliban,” said Mr. Strange, whose son intercepted communications as a Navy cryptologist. “They knew. Somebody tipped them off. There were guys in a tower. Guys on the bush line. They were sitting there, waiting. And they sent our guys right into the middle.”

Doug Hamburger’s son, Patrick, an Army staff sergeant, also perished when the CH-47D Chinook descended to a spot less than 150 yards from where armed Taliban fighters watched from a turret.

He asks why the command sent his son into Tangi Valley toward a “hot landing zone” in a cargo airship instead of a special operations helicopter. The souped-up choppers — the MH-47 and the MH-60 Black Hawk, which SEAL Team 6 rode the stealth version of to kill bin Laden — are flown by Night Stalker pilots skilled in fast, ground-hugging maneuvers to avoid detection.


Only questions remain: A CH-47 Chinook helicopter was the wrong aircraft to fly into an uninspected and unwatched landing zone infested with Taliban fighters, according to family members of some of the 30 Americans killed. The Chinook helicopter burst into flames before hitting the ground.

“When you want to fly them into a valley, when you’ve got hillsides on both sides of it with houses built into sides of the valley, that is an extremely dangerous mission,” Mr. Hamburger said. “The MH, the new model, they’ve got radar that will pick up an incoming missile or incoming RPG. They’re faster. They’re quicker on attack. They’re more agile. So there was every reason in the world to use the MH that night.”

Sith Douangdara, whose 26-year-old son, John, was a Navy expeditionary specialist who handled warrior dog Bart, said he has lots of unanswered questions.

“I want to know why so many U.S. servicemen, especially SEALs, were assembled on one aircraft,” he said. “I want to know why the black box of the helicopter has not been found. I want to know many things.”



Not all families believe the fact-finding investigation, conducted by Army Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Colt covered all issues. Gen. Colt, who has since been promoted to major general, told commanders that his job was not to find fault and his report did not criticize any person or decision.

“I want people held accountable,” said Mr. Strange, a former union construction worker who deals blackjack in a Philadelphia casino.

A spokesman for U.S. Central Command, which overseas the war and conducted the probe, declined to answer the families’ questions and referred a reporter to Gen. Colt’s report.

Congress gets involved

More than two years later, more answers may be forthcoming.

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, led by Rep. Darrell E. Issa, California Republican, is making inquiries after meeting with some families.

Larry Klayman, who runs the nonprofit watchdog group Freedom Watch, has filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the Pentagon, as well as the Air Force, Army and Navy. He wants a judge to order the military to turn over an array of documents under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act. He said the Defense Department stonewalled his written requests, so Freedom Watch went to court last month and succeeded in forcing the government to turn over records.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...l-team-6-crash-was-inside-job-/#ixzz2iMhQI2gi
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
 
He Shoulda Spit In The Black Mans Face

Medal of Honor Recipient William Swenson’s Request For Artillery Support Were Denied 10 Times During Battle of Ganjgal Because of Overly Strict ROE…

http://weaselzippers.us/wp-content/uploads/article-0-18D2F51200000578-365_634x430-550x373.jpg


And the clown hanging the medal around Captain William Swenson’s neck is the one who had those rules of engagement put in place.

Via Daily Mail:


The American hero awarded the Medal of Honor earlier this week for his bravery in fighting off 60 Taliban almost single-handedly for seven hours has spoken of his anger that repeated requests for backup during the ordeal were ignored by his commanders back at base.

Retired Captain William Swenson was awarded the nation’s top military medal by President Obama at the White House on Tuesday. The President said that when Swenson’s comrades needed him, he ‘was there for his brothers’…’we thank God he was there for us all.’

But now Swenson, 34, has spoken out about his frustration that his repeated – as many as ten – requests for backup were ignored by commanders who feared involvement would lead to civilian casualties.

Swenson was with a group of U.S. Marines and Afghan National Troops when they were ambushed from all sides outside the town of Ganjar on September 8, 2009, killing 10 Afghan and four American troops.

He called back to base for artillery fire which would have provided them with cover while they moved off the battlefield, but his request was repeatedly denied.

In an interview with David Martin of CBS News, Swenson was asked if the decision had left him bitter.

‘Was I bitter? I was angry,’ he replied.

‘If I call for artillery support,’ Swenson said, ‘I do so understanding the possibility of civilian casualties. . . . But that’s my decision. That’s my responsibility, my call – by doctrine – not somebody who is sitting several kilometers away.’

The lack of artillery support left Swenson and his men surrounded by enemy on three sides.
 
I don't know much about US politics but everytime I hear someone here talk about how Obama is the worst POTUS or the worst... whatever, this image pops up in my head.

http://jonathanturley.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/george-w-bush1.jpg

I dunno why. *shrugs*

I'm not saying that busy body and his racist buddy made all of this stuff up (which they probably did). And I'm not saying they're bitches for WANTING A WAR (they are and they did) but I wonder how the Afghan Army is coping?

Oh they don't even have parts for their Humvees or boots?

It reminds me of that one time Bush II sent billions of dollars to Iraq and had it disappear.


Missing Iraq money may have been stolen, auditors say


U.S. Defense officials still cannot say what happened to $6.6 billion, sent by the planeload in cash and intended for Iraq's reconstruction after the start of the war.

June 13, 2011|By Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times


Reporting from Washington — After the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003, the George W. Bush administration flooded the conquered country with so much cash to pay for reconstruction and other projects in the first year that a new unit of measurement was born.

Pentagon officials determined that one giant C-130 Hercules cargo plane could carry $2.4 billion in shrink-wrapped bricks of $100 bills. They sent an initial full planeload of cash, followed by 20 other flights to Iraq by May 2004 in a $12-billion haul that U.S. officials believe to be the biggest international cash airlift of all time.




This month, the Pentagon and the Iraqi government are finally closing the books on the program that handled all those Benjamins. But despite years of audits and investigations, U.S. Defense officials still cannot say what happened to $6.6 billion in cash — enough to run the Los Angeles Unified School District or the Chicago Public Schools for a year, among many other things.

For the first time, federal auditors are suggesting that some or all of the cash may have been stolen, not just mislaid in an accounting error. Stuart Bowen, special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, an office created by Congress, said the missing $6.6 billion may be "the largest theft of funds in national history."

The mystery is a growing embarrassment to the Pentagon, and an irritant to Washington's relations with Baghdad. Iraqi officials are threatening to go to court to reclaim the money, which came from Iraqi oil sales, seized Iraqi assets and surplus funds from the United Nations' oil-for-food program.

It's fair to say that Congress, which has already shelled out $61 billion of U.S. taxpayer money for similar reconstruction and development projects in Iraq, is none too thrilled either.

"Congress is not looking forward to having to spend billions of our money to make up for billions of their money that we can't account for, and can't seem to find," said Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Beverly Hills), who presided over hearings on waste, fraud and abuse in Iraq six years ago when he headed the House Government Reform Committee.

Theft of such a staggering sum might seem unlikely, but U.S. officials aren't ruling it out. Some U.S. contractors were accused of siphoning off tens of millions in kickbacks and graft during the post-invasion period, especially in its chaotic early days. But Iraqi officials were viewed as prime offenders.

The U.S. cash airlift was a desperation measure, organized when the Bush administration was eager to restore government services and a shattered economy to give Iraqis confidence that the new order would be a drastic improvement on Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

The White House decided to use the money in the so-called Development Fund for Iraq, which was created by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to hold money amassed during the years when Hussein's regime was under crippling economic and trade sanctions.

The cash was carried by tractor-trailer trucks from the fortress-like Federal Reserve currency repository in East Rutherford, N.J., to Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland, then flown to Baghdad. U.S. officials there stored the hoard in a basement vault at one of Hussein's former palaces, and at U.S. military bases, and eventually distributed the money to Iraqi ministries and contractors.

But U.S. officials often didn't have time or staff to keep strict financial controls. Millions of dollars were stuffed in gunnysacks and hauled on pickups to Iraqi agencies or contractors, officials have testified.

House Government Reform Committee investigators charged in 2005 that U.S. officials "used virtually no financial controls to account for these enormous cash withdrawals once they arrived in Iraq, and there is evidence of substantial waste, fraud and abuse in the actual spending and disbursement of the Iraqi funds."

Pentagon officials have contended for the last six years that they could account for the money if given enough time to track down the records. But repeated attempts to find the documentation, or better yet the cash, were fruitless.

Iraqi officials argue that the U.S. government was supposed to safeguard the stash under a 2004 legal agreement it signed with Iraq. That makes Washington responsible, they say.

Abdul Basit Turki Saeed, Iraq's chief auditor and president of the Iraqi Board of Supreme Audit, has warned U.S. officials that his government will go to court if necessary to recoup the missing money.

"Clearly Iraq has an interest in looking after its assets and protecting them," said Samir Sumaidaie, Iraq's ambassador to the United States.
 
View Post Unread Today, 05:45 PM
Remove user from ignore listdan_c00000
This message is hidden because dan_c00000 is on your ignore list.

View Post Unread Today, 05:48 PM
Remove user from ignore listRjThoughts
This message is hidden because RjThoughts is on your ignore list.


fuck you

fuck off

drop dead, NIGGERS
 
Back
Top