False flag tanker attack

I hope Trump says he doesn't want war so I watch you do a 180 and rage out over the lack of waring going on.
 
Last edited:
How did that planning work? The Iranians were keeping careful watch over the tankers to see when those evil Americans planted an Iranian mine on the side of the tanker so they could hurry over and get rid of it before they were blamed for this false flag operation?
 
How did that planning work? The Iranians were keeping careful watch over the tankers to see when those evil Americans planted an Iranian mine on the side of the tanker so they could hurry over and get rid of it before they were blamed for this false flag operation?

I'm wondering where the US got the Iranian manufactured mine in the first place. Maybe they stole it under the guise of a nuclear treaty inspection...
 
probably the same place eric prince buys the rest of his precious toys.
 
Sounds just like LovelyNice's 9-11 Bush conspiracy redux:
Al Qaeda didn't do that! Bush&Cheney used controlled explosives
to do that which has never been done before;
collapse a skyscraper into its footprint
in order to start a war...
 
The Straights of Hormuz need to just lighten up.

Maybe a vacation at Trans Mountain?
 
Let me guess - Iran used "Weapons of Mass Destruction" :rolleyes:

Borenextdoor not only is a chicken shit in the stock market and follows the mattress plan but is a supporter of Iran.

Does bombing ginormous oil tankers in the straight not count as mass destruction sissy boi?

What about the environmental effects your compadres might cause?

You dumbfucks really never really think it through to the end do you?
 
Borenextdoor not only is a chicken shit in the stock market and follows the mattress plan but is a supporter of Iran.

Does bombing ginormous oil tankers in the straight not count as mass destruction sissy boi?

What about the environmental effects your compadres might cause?

You dumbfucks really never really think it through to the end do you?


You should change your name to Randy.

http://www.bubblegumcards.org/PeeWee/Character6.jpg
 

That is my cousins name. Won't work.

Change yours to older, distinguished, non American that receives sexts from the older, distinguished expat that is unhappy with her marriage.

She is probably your best chance for some strange here unless you expand your horizons to fat immigrants that pretends to like her sponsor, I mean husband.
 
That is my cousins name. Won't work.

Change yours to older, distinguished, non American that receives sexts from the older, distinguished expat that is unhappy with her marriage.

She is probably your best chance for some strange here unless you expand your horizons to fat immigrants that pretends to like her sponsor, I mean husband.

That's a mighty long name.

Anything shorter? I know; Luk's Penis.
 
Borenextdoor not only is a chicken shit in the stock market and follows the mattress plan but is a supporter of Iran.

Does bombing ginormous oil tankers in the straight not count as mass destruction sissy boi?

What about the environmental effects your compadres might cause?

You dumbfucks really never really think it through to the end do you?
”Weapon of mass destruction” is a term like “terrorist.” It means whatever is politically expedient.

March 23, 2019, Syria announces the defeat of ISIS. April 8, Iran’s IRGC are declared the new terrorists.
 
yeah, it's weird how we don't trust the word of known liars who have lied to get us into wars in the past. that's very unreasonable of us.
 
Let me guess - Iran used "Weapons of Mass Destruction" :rolleyes:

....and do not forget the "Gleiwitz Incident" in 1939, Poles attacking a German radio station, which started 2nd WW. Lets hope this will not start the 3rd WW ( Iranians being "in" with the Russians) :rolleyes:
 
They weren't US flagged ships; why should we care? Let Japan handle it.

Could you imagine the cost of importing goods if we decided to leave the sea shipping lanes to whoever else was interested?

The minute we stop patrolling and policing, then the pirates take over,
some of them, as in the good old days being state sponsored...
 
We can't afford to be the world's policeman. I agree with the Trump Doctrine - we're done with being the big stupid kid on the playground that the smart kids go to for protection.

Japan's ship was attacked. Japan has a Navy (that we mostly paid for). Japan is a lot closer than we are. It's Japan's problem.
 
Could you imagine the cost of importing goods if we decided to leave the sea shipping lanes to whoever else was interested?

The minute we stop patrolling and policing, then the pirates take over,
some of them, as in the good old days being state sponsored...

As an aside, it's interesting to note the prescience of the founders. The Constitution mandates a standing Navy, but not a standing Army. (The Navy continually tries to bludgeon the Army and Air Force with that one.)
 
Yes we can.

So, does every nation that flags a ship need to maintain a navy large enough to follow their ships around and keep them safe?

Or, again, would you prefer we stand down and learn to live with the inflation and pay for it that way; imbedded in the costs of goods? Do we allow the Chinese Navy to sail right into our ports to protect their goods and interests? The Russians?
 
As an aside, it's interesting to note the prescience of the founders. The Constitution mandates a standing Navy, but not a standing Army. (The Navy continually tries to bludgeon the Army and Air Force with that one.)

Yes, with a Navy comes Marines...

;) ;)


:snicker:
 
Back
Top