woody54
Liberal critic Downunder
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2002
- Posts
- 10,741
One Nation under Israel
We have all been shocked by atrocities such as Rwanda and the Balkans but the US now joins that lowly group of criminals where the US army is hard at work eliminating "insurgents" where ever they find them in Fallujah.
Having already established that the US military dont have the wherewithall to establish a fighter from a civilian, their orders are to eliminate the insurgents wherever they see them. Apparently they dropped leaflets warning Armagheddon was about to commence but having seen how displaced people are treated by the US/Israel cabal in Palestine, why would they go anywhere, they would be better dead.
"Insurgent" is a specific word that has been coersed into a more radical meaning in the US Administrations New Speak Dictionary.
Traditionally the word means this: (Mirriam Webster)
Main Entry: 1in·sur·gent
Pronunciation: -j&nt
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin insurgent-, insurgens, present participle of insurgere to rise up, from in- + surgere to rise -- more at SURGE
1 : a person who revolts against civil authority or an established government; especially : a rebel not recognized as a belligerent
2 : one who acts contrary to the policies and decisions of one's own political party
Notice the non belligerent tone and we can legitimately call women and children "insurgents".
But these are not the fighters who are labelled as "terrorists".
If the insurgents are non belligerent, why has the US decided to commit mass murder in Fallujah on the tens of thousands of such people stuck in the city by labelling them all insurgents. No army guy is going to think twice when a non hemeted head pops up... Bang!!.
Bush had a plan from his Zionist Administration to "settle" the Fallujah problem after their May humiliation, and no-one was under any illusions of what this warmongering lot meant, yet the Jesus followers swarmed to the ballot boxes and gave Bush the tick in full knowledge of this.(Dumbfucks?)
Why do the majority of American Evangelical Christians support the Fallujah action which is clearly not in line with Christian ethics? How do they sleep easy knowing their team is murdering foreigners in their own country for no good reason but colonial greed? Arent the sins involved clearly banned in the Ten Commandments? What is wrong with these hypocrites? Do they ameliorate the greater sins by waffling about Gays and abortion?
The answer lies enmeshed in the deceitful growth of world Zionism and the way it has aided and abeted a more radical, harsher form of Christianity that uses a form of 'justifiable' racism selectively against the Unchosen Ones, in this case, the Arabs and more specifically, the religious enemy of Judaism, the Muslims.
Judaism has sidled closer to Christianity over the last 50 years and Fundies think it is because they all follow the same Bible and that the return of Israel is central to Biblical prophesy.
The largest publisher of American Bibles, Nelsons, with their subtly updated translations, now display the "all seeing eye of Horus" (Illuminati Logo) with their label.
This all defies the logic of the basic differences on which each faith is built.
Christianity developed as an offshoot of Judaism through the teachings of Jesus , who to this day is regarded as a Heretic by Jews for his fresh view on love and humility. The only way for the two to come closer is for Christians to deny Jesus and effectively, this is what Evangelicals do to promote their twist on the faith, even though they pay lip service to traditional teachings.
George Bush claims to be a Christian, yet his values as measured by his performance, do not validate that faith. Is he really a Christian?, you must ask.
It is becoming clearer what drives Rumsfeld to say "We just cant have this sort of thing" referring to anti invader insurgency.
They follow a different doctrine.
It is notable that on March 20, 1991, President Bush I signed into law a sinister Congressional Joint Resolution that became Public Law 102-14. This states emphatically that all civilization from the beginning has been based upon a set of laws entitled "The Seven Noahide Laws" and you probably believed that the Holy Bible was the basis upon which civilization was based. WRONG, according to American Law now. Who said there was no religion in the Legislation?.
According to the Encyclopedia Americana, p. 737, these laws are "a Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently, binding upon all mankind." These Laws originate from the Babylonian Talmut which is a man inspired collection of ideas based on the Torah(first 5 books of the Old Testament). It contains many anti Christian and occult/satanic references and was traditionally an oral record.
Judaism rules Jews through the Torah but the Noahide Laws are for 'Other mankind", the unchosen Gentiles. The rules are much harsher for non Jews, the lesser mortals.
The penalty for violating any of these Noahide Laws is spelled out on page 1192 of the Encyclopedia Judaica, "... violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation".
The Pharisees succeeded in killing Jesus Christ on the basis that He blasphemed God, which is Noahide Law # 2.
What was the thinking behind including such abominable, medieval rules into the body of modern American Law? Why was it hidden within an Education Day Proclomation?
It defies logic unless one considers conspiratorial ends. That aside, it is an indictment on the personal values of the Presidential Team that invoked this legislation and is an indication of the duplicity rampant among Judaised Christians in Public Service.
It also makes more sense of The Patriot Act being passed in the dead of night without elected officials being allowed to read it first before voting it in.... who ever heard of such an outrageous breach of the democratic process, irrespective of the percieved threat. Even now, sections are top secret... why?
Given the above thinking, one can be excused for concluding that every Muslim killed is a blessing for Israel, who is the only real beneficiary from all this death.
Gentiles killing each other for Judaism... a Pharisses ultimate dream. The bearded morticians of Israel will be very pleased.
If the Good Book has any truth to it, on Judgement day there will be a lot of familiar faces waiting at the Liftdoor for DOWN.
We have all been shocked by atrocities such as Rwanda and the Balkans but the US now joins that lowly group of criminals where the US army is hard at work eliminating "insurgents" where ever they find them in Fallujah.
Having already established that the US military dont have the wherewithall to establish a fighter from a civilian, their orders are to eliminate the insurgents wherever they see them. Apparently they dropped leaflets warning Armagheddon was about to commence but having seen how displaced people are treated by the US/Israel cabal in Palestine, why would they go anywhere, they would be better dead.
"Insurgent" is a specific word that has been coersed into a more radical meaning in the US Administrations New Speak Dictionary.
Traditionally the word means this: (Mirriam Webster)
Main Entry: 1in·sur·gent
Pronunciation: -j&nt
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin insurgent-, insurgens, present participle of insurgere to rise up, from in- + surgere to rise -- more at SURGE
1 : a person who revolts against civil authority or an established government; especially : a rebel not recognized as a belligerent
2 : one who acts contrary to the policies and decisions of one's own political party
Notice the non belligerent tone and we can legitimately call women and children "insurgents".
But these are not the fighters who are labelled as "terrorists".
If the insurgents are non belligerent, why has the US decided to commit mass murder in Fallujah on the tens of thousands of such people stuck in the city by labelling them all insurgents. No army guy is going to think twice when a non hemeted head pops up... Bang!!.
Bush had a plan from his Zionist Administration to "settle" the Fallujah problem after their May humiliation, and no-one was under any illusions of what this warmongering lot meant, yet the Jesus followers swarmed to the ballot boxes and gave Bush the tick in full knowledge of this.(Dumbfucks?)
Why do the majority of American Evangelical Christians support the Fallujah action which is clearly not in line with Christian ethics? How do they sleep easy knowing their team is murdering foreigners in their own country for no good reason but colonial greed? Arent the sins involved clearly banned in the Ten Commandments? What is wrong with these hypocrites? Do they ameliorate the greater sins by waffling about Gays and abortion?
The answer lies enmeshed in the deceitful growth of world Zionism and the way it has aided and abeted a more radical, harsher form of Christianity that uses a form of 'justifiable' racism selectively against the Unchosen Ones, in this case, the Arabs and more specifically, the religious enemy of Judaism, the Muslims.
Judaism has sidled closer to Christianity over the last 50 years and Fundies think it is because they all follow the same Bible and that the return of Israel is central to Biblical prophesy.
The largest publisher of American Bibles, Nelsons, with their subtly updated translations, now display the "all seeing eye of Horus" (Illuminati Logo) with their label.
This all defies the logic of the basic differences on which each faith is built.
Christianity developed as an offshoot of Judaism through the teachings of Jesus , who to this day is regarded as a Heretic by Jews for his fresh view on love and humility. The only way for the two to come closer is for Christians to deny Jesus and effectively, this is what Evangelicals do to promote their twist on the faith, even though they pay lip service to traditional teachings.
George Bush claims to be a Christian, yet his values as measured by his performance, do not validate that faith. Is he really a Christian?, you must ask.
It is becoming clearer what drives Rumsfeld to say "We just cant have this sort of thing" referring to anti invader insurgency.
They follow a different doctrine.
It is notable that on March 20, 1991, President Bush I signed into law a sinister Congressional Joint Resolution that became Public Law 102-14. This states emphatically that all civilization from the beginning has been based upon a set of laws entitled "The Seven Noahide Laws" and you probably believed that the Holy Bible was the basis upon which civilization was based. WRONG, according to American Law now. Who said there was no religion in the Legislation?.
According to the Encyclopedia Americana, p. 737, these laws are "a Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently, binding upon all mankind." These Laws originate from the Babylonian Talmut which is a man inspired collection of ideas based on the Torah(first 5 books of the Old Testament). It contains many anti Christian and occult/satanic references and was traditionally an oral record.
Judaism rules Jews through the Torah but the Noahide Laws are for 'Other mankind", the unchosen Gentiles. The rules are much harsher for non Jews, the lesser mortals.
The penalty for violating any of these Noahide Laws is spelled out on page 1192 of the Encyclopedia Judaica, "... violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation".
The Pharisees succeeded in killing Jesus Christ on the basis that He blasphemed God, which is Noahide Law # 2.
What was the thinking behind including such abominable, medieval rules into the body of modern American Law? Why was it hidden within an Education Day Proclomation?
It defies logic unless one considers conspiratorial ends. That aside, it is an indictment on the personal values of the Presidential Team that invoked this legislation and is an indication of the duplicity rampant among Judaised Christians in Public Service.
It also makes more sense of The Patriot Act being passed in the dead of night without elected officials being allowed to read it first before voting it in.... who ever heard of such an outrageous breach of the democratic process, irrespective of the percieved threat. Even now, sections are top secret... why?
Given the above thinking, one can be excused for concluding that every Muslim killed is a blessing for Israel, who is the only real beneficiary from all this death.
Gentiles killing each other for Judaism... a Pharisses ultimate dream. The bearded morticians of Israel will be very pleased.
If the Good Book has any truth to it, on Judgement day there will be a lot of familiar faces waiting at the Liftdoor for DOWN.
(makes note to avoid sudden hand movements......)
