Okay, I admit it! I listen to Dr Laura at work. Can't help myself! While I disagree with a majority of what she says (I feel she is just "preachy" and self-righteous), I find her program entertaining and truly feel for some of the people that call in.
A little background: a couple of days ago a woman called into the program and said she was having difficulty feeling sexual towards her husband. Rather than attempting to find out what was going on in this woman's life or recommending this woman might want to look into counseling, Dr. Laura told this woman she should give into her husband's demands for sex, regardless of whether or not the woman feels sexual towards her husband. Dr Laura's premise was that this woman's husband provided for her, took care of her, and therefore was entitled to a wife who was willing to have sex - no matter what.
Today, Dr. Laura read a letter (supposedly) from another woman who stated that she knew women might have issues with being told to "fake it" with their husbands. However, husbands have to "fake it" when they attend social functions they'd rather not or being pleasant to their kids when they had had a bad day. In the end, this woman who wrote the letter stated that "faking it" was really putting love in front of mood.
This kind of struck me and I just wanted to find out what folks here thought of this type of reasoning.
For me, I firmly believe there are compromises made in any relationship, especially marriage. Just as men might be obligated to attend social functions they'd rather not for their wives sake, many women feel obligated to go along with things their husbands want to do that they would rather not do. Example: I'm not a fan of sci fi or action movies, but my S/O loves them. I go with him or watch them when he rents them (and even if I don't like the movie, I enjoy the time we are together), but he returns that by going/doing things I like to do that he isn't always interested in.
However, when it comes to the physical side of our relationship, I think it's different. I would NOT want him to "fake it" that in any way just to make me feel better. At the same time, he has always been respectful if I let him know that I'm just not feeling amorous for whatever reason that evening. We cuddle, we kiss, we call it an evening and neither one of us feels badly about it.
Hopefully, if one or the other of us feels we are no longer physically turned on by the other, we will have the ability to either discuss it or seek outside help.
But....what do those here think? Should a wife "fake" her desire for sex (either for one night or an extended period of time) with her husband/SO/boyfriend simply because he "fakes" other things in life? Is this a fair exchange? And I am very interested in knowing how men think/feel. Would you want your wife/SO to fake her desire just for the sake of letting you get off? Most of the men I've talked to have said if a woman isn't into sex, they'd rather pass it up, but maybe there is something I'm missing?
Sorry for the length, all. But you know how verbose I can be!!
A little background: a couple of days ago a woman called into the program and said she was having difficulty feeling sexual towards her husband. Rather than attempting to find out what was going on in this woman's life or recommending this woman might want to look into counseling, Dr. Laura told this woman she should give into her husband's demands for sex, regardless of whether or not the woman feels sexual towards her husband. Dr Laura's premise was that this woman's husband provided for her, took care of her, and therefore was entitled to a wife who was willing to have sex - no matter what.
Today, Dr. Laura read a letter (supposedly) from another woman who stated that she knew women might have issues with being told to "fake it" with their husbands. However, husbands have to "fake it" when they attend social functions they'd rather not or being pleasant to their kids when they had had a bad day. In the end, this woman who wrote the letter stated that "faking it" was really putting love in front of mood.
This kind of struck me and I just wanted to find out what folks here thought of this type of reasoning.
For me, I firmly believe there are compromises made in any relationship, especially marriage. Just as men might be obligated to attend social functions they'd rather not for their wives sake, many women feel obligated to go along with things their husbands want to do that they would rather not do. Example: I'm not a fan of sci fi or action movies, but my S/O loves them. I go with him or watch them when he rents them (and even if I don't like the movie, I enjoy the time we are together), but he returns that by going/doing things I like to do that he isn't always interested in.
However, when it comes to the physical side of our relationship, I think it's different. I would NOT want him to "fake it" that in any way just to make me feel better. At the same time, he has always been respectful if I let him know that I'm just not feeling amorous for whatever reason that evening. We cuddle, we kiss, we call it an evening and neither one of us feels badly about it.
Hopefully, if one or the other of us feels we are no longer physically turned on by the other, we will have the ability to either discuss it or seek outside help.
But....what do those here think? Should a wife "fake" her desire for sex (either for one night or an extended period of time) with her husband/SO/boyfriend simply because he "fakes" other things in life? Is this a fair exchange? And I am very interested in knowing how men think/feel. Would you want your wife/SO to fake her desire just for the sake of letting you get off? Most of the men I've talked to have said if a woman isn't into sex, they'd rather pass it up, but maybe there is something I'm missing?
Sorry for the length, all. But you know how verbose I can be!!
)
