Facesitting

I do not in understand the use of “fur” to describe pussy hair (never men's pubes). It's as if there's some subliminal desire to animalize the woman.
 
Yes, but. So very AI.
How can you tell? Serious question. When someone spots and points out a "tell" or however one describes an AI fault, I can see it. But without some "training" I don't know how to find it myself. If you think this belongs on a different thread, please let me know which one. Apologies to the OP.
 
How can you tell? Serious question. When someone spots and points out a "tell" or however one describes an AI fault, I can see it. But without some "training" I don't know how to find it myself.
It varies from one image to the next. In this case, the tells that jumped out at me were
  1. Exaggerated color definition
  2. Extreme detail on all parts of the photo. There's no softening of detail in points outside the focal point of the image, or outside what would be the focal length of a natural camera.*
  3. Unnaturally sharp edges to all parts of the image. This is what would have been called, in the old days of Photoshop and Illustrator, vector imaging rather than pixel imaging.
*(Edit: or to put it another way, it's as if the image has no focal point. All points are in focus simultaneously.)
 
Last edited:
It varies from one image to the next. In this case, the tells that jumped out at me were
  1. Exaggerated color definition
  2. Extreme detail on all parts of the photo. There's no softening of detail in points outside the focal point of the image, or outside what would be the focal length of a natural camera.*
  3. Unnaturally sharp edges to all parts of the imaging. This is what would have been called, in the old days of Photoshop and Illustrator, vector imaging rather than pixel imaging.
*(Edit: or to put it another way, it's as if the image has no focal point. All points are in focus simultaneously.)
Thanks so much. I guess I should look for a class on this at the local community college LOL. I do see that the sofa is as well defined as her face, something you wouldn't get with a lensed/aperture camera unless you stopped it down to f22 and added a lot of lighting or something. And the color brilliance is something most of us would have adjusted with software or developing variations. Curious that the drapes are a bit fuzzy but the wallpaper is sharper. I suppose inconsistencies is an umbrella term for all those things that give it away. Thanks again.
 
It varies from one image to the next. In this case, the tells that jumped out at me were
  1. Exaggerated color definition
  2. Extreme detail on all parts of the photo. There's no softening of detail in points outside the focal point of the image, or outside what would be the focal length of a natural camera.*
  3. Unnaturally sharp edges to all parts of the imaging. This is what would have been called, in the old days of Photoshop and Illustrator, vector imaging rather than pixel imaging.
*(Edit: or to put it another way, it's as if the image has no focal point. All points are in focus simultaneously.)
Oy vey, AI is so tiring.
 
I love having my wife's pussy pressed on my face, before or after I cum in it. I can get off just eating her pussy and she knows any time, she can walk in the room, sit on my face, and enjoy a nice orgasm and then go right back to what she's doing. I'll go down on her even without the promise of sex. I get off on licking her and can almost cum just feeling her cum on my face.
Does she have you lick her clean after you have filled full? I always love when my wife sits on my mouth after I've pumped her full.
 
Back
Top