Facebook deathwatch...

Yep. You bemoan the loss of jobs. Lots of which are heavilly exploited temporary workers. It is possible, but highly doubtful, that Facebook eschews this practice.

You don't hear anyone making the argument about Silicoln Valley workers that they make about Walmart that it is being propped up because the workers qualify for government benefits.

Besides, anything that impoverished California has to be good for real America! Let's hope, for purposes of making America great again, that the shares of alphabet tumble next.

Oh, so now you're saying that 45's "robust" jobs number is heavily inflated by under employed and temp workers. Gotcha.
 
Oh, so now you're saying that 45's "robust" jobs number is heavily inflated by under employed and temp workers. Gotcha.

No, just in Clinton fan-boy country. The rest of the country is benefiting from more capital being available to capitalists because Gov't is plundering less, and allowing them to bring home some of the money that they earned elsewhere.

Turns out you can hire a lot of people when you are facing 5% Growth

Besides your line is that the labor participation rate is only as high as it is because people are working two jobs.
 
Last edited:
No, just in Clinton fan-boy country. The rest of the country is benefiting from more capital being available to capitalists because Gov't is plundering less, and allowing them to bring home some of the money that they earned elsewhere.

Besides your line is that the labor participation rate is only as high as it is because people are working two jobs.

I wonder if the moron know's that you don't get counted twice for being employed for working two jobs?
 
When Zuckerface hits the soup line, can I yell 'No soup for YOU!!"
 
No, just in Clinton fan-boy country. The rest of the country is benefiting from more capital being available to capitalists because Gov't is plundering less, and allowing them to bring home some of the money that they earned elsewhere.

Turns out you can hire a lot of people when you are facing 5% Growth

Besides your line is that the labor participation rate is only as high as it is because people are working two jobs.

I wonder if the moron know's that you don't get counted twice for being employed for working two jobs?

It's rare that ya get two dipshits ascribing positions to people who don't feel or think that way in the same thread..

I'm also impressed with your bringing Clinton into the mix where they don't belong.
 
It's rare that ya get two dipshits ascribing positions to people who don't feel or think that way in the same thread..

I'm also impressed with your bringing Clinton into the mix where they don't belong.

Clinton does not belong in a discussion about the flip side of the economic choice voters made? Tarring California where actually gerrymandering means Republicans need not bother to show up and its sanctuary cities where "undocumented" "citizens" totally did not vote for being stupid enough to push Clinton's vote count over the not-relevant "finish line" in the irrelevant popu knowkar vote is not relevant?

Yeah, maybe you're right.
 
Myspace still exists so it's doubtful FB is going anywhere.
 
Clinton does not belong in a discussion about the flip side of the economic choice voters made? Tarring California where actually gerrymandering means Republicans need not bother to show up and its sanctuary cities where "undocumented" "citizens" totally did not vote for being stupid enough to push Clinton's vote count over the not-relevant "finish line" in the irrelevant popu knowkar vote is not relevant?

Yeah, maybe you're right.
Finally, you've admitted the illegal immigrant voting meme BS you've been pushing for years is just that, BS.
 
Finally, you've admitted the illegal immigrant voting meme BS you've been pushing for years is just that, BS.

Of course not. Why would they take such a tremendous risk in neighborhoods where they are the heavy majority when the president of the United States I assured them that no federal agency would be concerned if they did?
 
Except the National Capital Planning Commission approved the new fence on Feb 3 2017 with completion this year.

But it is a bigly fence. Bigger, better stronger!

The mechanism was put into place by President Obama after the fence was scaled.

Look it up. The year was 2014.
 
Skip down, they use “burner phones or no phones at all”


So, burner phones aren't phones?

You should learn to lose gracefully.

Or at least have your wife pose for more pics for us as a way to compensate us for putting up with your stupidity.
 
Is it dead yet?


It was dead to me years ago.

It's blocked in my router. I wish I could find a way to block all reference to it across the web, including emails, news articles, forum posts and their logos infesting other sites.
 
So, burner phones aren't phones?

You should learn to lose gracefully.

Or at least have your wife pose for more pics for us as a way to compensate us for putting up with your stupidity.

I never thought of that. I must be slipping. :)
 
I never thought of that. I must be slipping. :)

The photos aren't selfies.
Much hotter kinky Wife1 left him on Lit.
He disappears.
Comparatively demure "no sex please, I'm happily married" Wife2 appears.
No nudity, mostly ass-up pics.
Loves talking about his faux Shelby.
 
The photos aren't selfies.
Much hotter kinky Wife1 left him on Lit.
He disappears.
Comparatively demure "no sex please, I'm happily married" Wife2 appears.
No nudity, mostly ass-up pics.
Loves talking about his faux Shelby.

Not that you're paying attention, or anything. :)
 
The photos aren't selfies.
Much hotter kinky Wife1 left him on Lit.
He disappears.
Comparatively demure "no sex please, I'm happily married" Wife2 appears.
No nudity, mostly ass-up pics.
Loves talking about his faux Shelby.

Don't really know the backstory there but it's true that if curious if someone is male or female a good rule of thumb to follow is selfie=potential female, not selfie=probably the husband/boyfriend.
 
The mechanism was put into place by President Obama after the fence was scaled.

Look it up. The year was 2014.
So you think Obama woke up one morning and tweeted how he was going to build a bigger better fence around the white house? You're confusing him with Trump who is always talking about "bigger and better".

In actual fact the decision was made by an independent panel (the United States Secret Service Protective Mission Panel) assigned to look at overall secret service shortcomings. I'd be surprised if Obama had any input on the fence whatsoever.

Now, if you believed it was such a horrible idea, why didn't you write a letter to Trump and ask him to cancel the project? He certainly had plenty of time to do so.

Oh, right, you'd rather just whine about Obama and push BS memes. :rolleyes:
 
So, burner phones aren't phones?

You should learn to lose gracefully.

Or at least have your wife pose for more pics for us as a way to compensate us for putting up with your stupidity.

Oh poor little Lance, not getting enough attention. There, there...
 
Back
Top