Ishmael
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2001
- Posts
- 84,005
GreenEyedGirl said:
Thanks for a fresh perspective, I agree with you that we use art as an attempt to capture/release/explain/present ourselves. That art can be a frozen moment in our lives.
But what if one also considers the amber that holds the moment to be art?
I think Hamlet wrote "refuse common sense in the disctinction between Life and Art." (correct me if I am wrong, I can not find the line now). This is an excellent point to the amber being Art as well. Can Art be created only? Does it exist as a free element? Are we simply harnassing something raw and altering it to please our esthetics?
Art, in one form or another, is always created, if only in the mind of the viewer. Art can exist without the purposeful intervention of the artist, but not without the viewer. It's the old "tree falling in the forest" paradox. In other words, art may exist in and of itself, but without a viewer, who would know?
I choose amber quite purposefully. It was my way of 'painting' with words what I think the components of art are. There is the constuct that the artist saw in his/her minds eye as the work was created (What the artist thought they were placing in the amber). The actuality of the results of the labor (That which is truly in the amber). And the work as seen and interpreted by the viewer (what the viewer perceives in the amber). The amber surrounds the created work and acts as a distorter and diffuser of the created work. Much as our brain distorts and diffuses what the artist is trying to tell us about their life. And so in that distortion, the viewer has created a new work, the amber was the enabler and is now part and parcel of the complete work. The three components are inseperable.
Ishmael
