LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
The examples are legion, here's one:
a) men don't count; or
b) they're saying men aren't affected.
So why is this exclusion of men acceptable?
So eitherhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ed-lamp-bring-1-5billion-people-darkness.html
'The World Bank estimates that, as a result, 780 million women and children inhale smoke which is equivalent to smoking 2 packets of cigarettes every day,' the page says.
a) men don't count; or
b) they're saying men aren't affected.
So why is this exclusion of men acceptable?