Especially for LJ

[KimGordon67]

Male sex robots

I think that's checkmate.

 

[Amoebah]

Is the second story in the link for Rory?

 

[KimGordon67]

LJ's "checkmate" was only reaching 5"2' at adulthood.

Meh ... I quite like short guys. (That's NOT code for 'I quite like LJ', just to be clear.)

 

[Aphro]

Male sex robots

I think that's checkmate.

They all look like gay porn to me.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Meh ... I quite like short guys.

That's your cue, Que!​

Cue Que...cuckoo....get it? Get it?

#ShortPeopleGotNoReasonToLive

 

[Aphro]

That's your cue, Que!​

Cue Que...cuckoo....get it? Get it?

#ShortPeopleGotNoReasonToLive

Excuse me?

 

[KimGordon67]

That's your cue, Que!​

Cue Que...cuckoo....get it? Get it?

#ShortPeopleGotNoReasonToLive

Let me edit that ... I quite like short brown guys. (I think Que's white, though I'm not sure why I think that - possibly I'm wrong.)
But still not LJ.

 

[Adder4321]

Male sex robots

I think that's checkmate.

I would be willing to bet that sex robot hype will die down in a few years. Now don't get me wrong, people will still use them, but anyone who can have sex with an actual human being will generally choose the human.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Let me edit that ... I quite like short brown guys. (I think Que's white, though I'm not sure why I think that - possibly I'm wrong.)
But still not LJ.

LJ is not LJ. He's obviously had some sort of breakdown.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

LOL a thread in my honor.

Male sex robots

I think that's checkmate.

Too bad I don't give a shit. Women have been using vibrators to replace men for decades. Male sex robots wouldn't change jack shit for anyone. Women have never assigned much value to men as it is. We're used to that. We're used to competing with things and other people for women. We're used to dating hell. Male sex robots is just another Tuesday in the long hellish week that is courting women.

You're the ones who are not going to be used to a time when you can't rely on your sex to get men to do shit for you. Women are used to being hit on and making men jump through hoops to court them - they're not used to seeing all that dry up.

Bring on the male sex robots - women have already run out of ways they can make things worse for men.

LJ's "checkmate" was only reaching 5"2' at adulthood.

More lies from the mangina who loses out on account of having no dick.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Meh ... I quite like short guys. (That's NOT code for 'I quite like LJ', just to be clear.)

That's cool, if you're looking for short men you will literally miss me because I'm 5'11/6', not 5'2.

But that also means I can walk right up on any of these manginas and bean them on the head with a bat and they'd never see it coming because they'd be looking for a fight with a midget

And LOL at you thinking you got my goat with male sex robots.

 

[SissySalina]

Male sex robots

I think that's checkmate.

But how do they taste?

 

[Hypoxia]

But how do they taste?

Especially after they've worked their way through your alimentary tract from anus to mouth or vice-versa? Robots are inexorable, right? They only stop at the other end. Oooh...

 

[ConfusedSheep]

Pretty sure I came across articles of females complaining about sex dolls/robots made to simulate a female, never the other way around.

The irony is that females dont really need to do much to get a guy to sleep with them, so it really just begs the question of "why do females need male sex robots"? I Dont think its about contraception all that much. I'd be interested to know which age groups would be purchasing these? I doubt it would be 18-26yr old females, it could also open doors for gay males (as aids is a rampant problem, which also isn't exclusive to gays). I'm assuming the targets are gay males, women that either cant attract what they think they deserve, or women who just dont get approached at all vs guys that dont want to pay 50-100$ on a dinner date to not get laid. How could you even quantify the return on the sex doll for females? If a man chose to not go on 10 dates that cost 100$ each, thats 1,000$ which can afford one of many dolls out there, so you could say that fucking the doll as many times as you wanted within 10 days sort of paid for itself and more, anything after the 10th session is gravy.

Either way, its a doubled edged sword come the advancement of robotics and AI. It may eliminate the circulation of STDs-i's within a generation or 2, but it may also contribute to less pair bonding in the dating realm ie: why go out and try dating when you have robots?

 

[Hypoxia]

Either way, its a doubled edged sword come the advancement of robotics and AI. It may eliminate the circulation of STDs-i's within a generation or 2, but it may also contribute to less pair bonding in the dating realm ie: why go out and try dating when you have robots?

Robots or teledildonics are only make-do's. The singularity will result when we perfect cerebral implants for direct brain-computer interfacing. Then AI's can stimulate human senses directly. You won't need contact at all. Just download a celebrity's personality to fuck your mind.

Tentacles are optional.

 

[Queefer]

That's cool, if you're looking for short men you will literally miss me because I'm 5'11/6', not 5'2.

But that also means I can walk right up on any of these manginas and bean them on the head with a bat and they'd never see it coming because they'd be looking for a fight with a midget

And LOL at you thinking you got my goat with male sex robots.

Now i will have to find thay picture of you with a bat

 

[ConfusedSheep]

Robots or teledildonics are only make-do's. The singularity will result when we perfect cerebral implants for direct brain-computer interfacing. Then AI's can stimulate human senses directly. You won't need contact at all. Just download a celebrity's personality to fuck your mind.

Tentacles are optional.

Interesting idea, although I dont know if that would even be the direction society would take with it in the grand scheme. I'm thinking they would probably just go all out to merge with a super computer and shed our flesh to adopt a mechanical chassis. Technology like that would be like a pseudo-immortality, if anything was to happen, you could just back-up your consciousness onto a cloud incase your unit got damaged/destroyed, or maybe even just merging all consciousness to 1 entity, would be kind of like a hive mind type thing, but wouldn't that be the only solution? Strip individualism for collectivism? Global resource acquisition/ diseases/ killing and poisoning others, it just seems like maybe we aren't ready for the greater conquest to evolve (if you count merging with computers as evolving). I probably come off as a little misanthropic.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Pretty sure I came across articles of females complaining about sex dolls/robots made to simulate a female, never the other way around.

The irony is that females dont really need to do much to get a guy to sleep with them, so it really just begs the question of "why do females need male sex robots"? I Dont think its about contraception all that much. I'd be interested to know which age groups would be purchasing these? I doubt it would be 18-26yr old females, it could also open doors for gay males (as aids is a rampant problem, which also isn't exclusive to gays). I'm assuming the targets are gay males, women that either cant attract what they think they deserve, or women who just dont get approached at all vs guys that dont want to pay 50-100$ on a dinner date to not get laid. How could you even quantify the return on the sex doll for females? If a man chose to not go on 10 dates that cost 100$ each, thats 1,000$ which can afford one of many dolls out there, so you could say that fucking the doll as many times as you wanted within 10 days sort of paid for itself and more, anything after the 10th session is gravy.

Either way, its a doubled edged sword come the advancement of robotics and AI. It may eliminate the circulation of STDs-i's within a generation or 2, but it may also contribute to less pair bonding in the dating realm ie: why go out and try dating when you have robots?

It will mean women lose ALL their power over men. All women on here know that dating means a large financial windfall for women in the form of the guy paying for stuff for her. Their mockery of men who talk about sex robots is nothing more than a fear of seeing their money train getting derailed.

Male sex robots won't solve the problem of the derailed money train. Plus for us men, male sex robots means more of the same that we're already used to.

But female companion robots will also mean that the women who have already learned how to get along without using sex to get ahead will further thrive while the hypergamic women will literally disappear because their financial food source has died (see: the dinosaurs after the meteor). A net plus for womankind.

 

[ConfusedSheep]

But female companion robots will also mean that the women who have already learned how to get along without using sex to get ahead will further thrive while the hypergamic women will literally disappear because their financial food source has died (see: the dinosaurs after the meteor). A net plus for womankind.

A net plus??? Really? I sort of thought that the sex robots would actually damage female kind. If the 80 20 rule is anything to go by, most women in the western world and japan will probably go extinct in the upcoming generations. The only countries that seem to be reproducing at near replacement rates are China/middle-east/Africa, but even those countries are seeing slight decreases over the years. Hypergamy is the biological response to filter out the "weak" from the "strong", but the only thing that dictates "strong" in the modern world is typically being wealthy. Not to suggest a communist idea, but if the same group of people hold the most wealth, women will always gravitate to those who are financially stable/superior, no? Even if they have damaged genes, which is kind of a paradox that hypergamous women will/do reproduce with biologically inferior males if it means attaining wealth. I personally think there is good hypergamy and bad hypergamy, good being choosing people who have the least amount of health complications (whether hereditary or w.e), bad being choosing someone based off of having resources specifically.

Not to be the arbiter of humanity, but I think some people just aren't fit to be parents, many who are rich and poor.

Back to the robot thing, I think using robotic augmentation for limbs or future utility droids would help a lot of people in the world, but companion bots seems like band aid solution for human interaction imo. There has to be a better way.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

A net plus??? Really? I sort of thought that the sex robots would actually damage female kind. If the 80 20 rule is anything to go by, most women in the western world and japan will probably go extinct in the upcoming generations.

Nah, that's a misconception propagated by feminists and real "meta-kill all women" misogynists alike. It won't destroy womankind any more than dishwashers and laundry machine did when they made so-called "women's work" less necessary. The idea that sex robots will destroy women in such a way suggests that women only really exist for sex and that's just not true.

And there is never any such thing as 'good' hypergamy.

 

[Hypoxia]

Somebody will release an engineered microbe that will reduce all hominids to grey goo.

Robots will be all that remain, so cherish them.

Fuck a bolt.

 

[DMBFFF]

That's cool, if you're looking for short men you will literally miss me because I'm 5'11/6', not 5'2.

But that also means I can walk right up on any of these manginas and bean them on the head with a bat and they'd never see it coming because they'd be looking for a fight with a midget

Say what?

Robots or teledildonics are only make-do's. The singularity will result when we perfect cerebral implants for direct brain-computer interfacing. Then AI's can stimulate human senses directly. You won't need contact at all. Just download a celebrity's personality to fuck your mind.

Tentacles are optional.

Weren't they going to use pills for that?

Barbarella (1968) meets Dildano
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ml7V7LvSi0M
They start tripping out 1:15 into the 3:25 video.

money train getting derailed.

That link tends to disappear.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Say what?

What's wrong with you people and your inability to understand clear, concise English?

Anyone who is looking for me is expecting to find a 5'2 man. Since I'm over 9 inches taller than that, they're never going to find me. If I find them first they're not going to see me coming. They've got their profile all wrong, which gives me a strong stealth advantage. What part of this actually confused you?

Ah, don't answer. You can't.

And LOL at the fact that KKKimGordon called me out and then she shut the fuck up and got the fuck out of her own thread as soon as she realized why male sex robots will mean absolutely nothing to men even if they are wildly successful. Men will look at male sex robots and say "meh, same bullshit competition as usual, except made of metal."

Can you read me now, KKKimmy? Nobody's gonna give a fuck about male sex robots, and you know it. Your thread was a bust except for the mutual masturbation society echo chamber you gathered around you.