Erotic Art:Saudelli

seXieleXie · Dec 30, 2001

mmm...

delicious

Natalie Nessus · Dec 30, 2001

Re: mmm...

seXieleXie said:
delicious

But of course

Natalie Nessus · Dec 30, 2001

Fly_On_Wall · Dec 30, 2001

you know... I remeber someone starteing a thread that said nomore art till 2002....

wonder whom that was???

alltherage · Dec 30, 2001

Ummmm. Tie me up anytime. These were wonderful. Merci

Natalie Nessus · Dec 30, 2001

Fly_On_Wall said:
you know... I remeber someone starteing a thread that said nomore art till 2002....

wonder whom that was???

that is true, my Fly

but I expected to be away until then but, things change, yes?

You want me not to post?

Juspar Emvan · Dec 30, 2001

HELL NO!

Love your art threads as always Nessus. Especially saude10. *Shiver*

modest mouse · Dec 30, 2001

I must say...that some of theses are 'too' direct for my taste, I am not drawn in but rather left on the outside looking in.

#2 The implication of the feather is more thought provoking than the image. One woman sitting down and taking her lovers feet with the feather brushing her back on its way to the soles of her feet. Its also interesting to note how often erotica presents an interracial scene without it be specifically about that.

#8 Another one that provokes thought. The eye contact is direct but I see an entire scene at work. The women are sitting on a pile of rope in the hold of a ship, as if the lady on the left were truly a captive. I see woman on the right as a 'countess', keeping a playtoy for her trip across the Atlantic.

Also, there is an inverted female symbol between the knees of the women.

***

Nessus,

Do you take any interest in erotic photography or are you primarily focused on paintings, sketches, etc?

Fly_On_Wall · Dec 30, 2001

Nessus said:
that is true, my Fly but I expected to be away until then but, things change, yes?

You want me not to post?

Nope

don't want you to post any more art threads

I want them all sent to me privetly

Starfish · Dec 30, 2001

modest mouse said:
Nessus,

Do you take any interest in erotic photography or are you primarily focused on paintings, sketches, etc?

OMG! I was coming on this thread to ask her that very question. I have a bunch of old bondage pics of women from this one website, and they might intrest her.

I know this isn't the place to put them all, but I'll post one, and if you like them, I'll put them all on one thread for you.

MM, why did you ask? You're just very clever aren't you? You know thy Starfish. Yes you do.

Natalie Nessus · Dec 30, 2001

modest mouse said:
I must say...that some of theses are 'too' direct for my taste, I am not drawn in but rather left on the outside looking in.

#2 The implication of the feather is more thought provoking than the image. One woman sitting down and taking her lovers feet with the feather brushing her back on its way to the soles of her feet. Its also interesting to note how often erotica presents an interracial scene without it be specifically about that.

#8 Another one that provokes thought. The eye contact is direct but I see an entire scene at work. The women are sitting on a pile of rope in the hold of a ship, as if the lady on the left were truly a captive. I see woman on the right as a 'countess', keeping a playtoy for her trip across the Atlantic.

Also, there is an inverted female symbol between the knees of the women.

***

Nessus,

Do you take any interest in erotic photography or are you primarily focused on paintings, sketches, etc?

You are an intense watcher, yes?

It is good. These scenes draw me in, it is interesting to me, yes

I know it would not be to others. The racial one is special to me.

I love all art, my friend, all, it matters not whether it be cinema, photography or the pencil. As long as it touches me

Starfish · Dec 30, 2001

I guess I'd have to post one, huh?

Duh!

Natalie Nessus · Dec 30, 2001

Starfish said:
OMG! I was coming on this thread to ask her that very question. I have a bunch of old bondage pics of women from this one website, and they might intrest her.

I know this isn't the place to put them all, but I'll post one, and if you like them, I'll put them all on one thread for you.

MM, why did you ask? You're just very clever aren't you? You know thy Starfish. Yes you do.

That would be nice, Starfish") merci

or email?

Juspar Emvan · Dec 30, 2001

Starfish said:
I guess I'd have to post one, huh?

Duh!

Nice pic, but damn, your av (or is that av's?) is way better!

Natalie Nessus · Dec 30, 2001

Starfish said:
I guess I'd have to post one, huh?

Duh!

exquisite

modest mouse · Dec 30, 2001

Starfish said:
MM, why did you ask? You're just very clever aren't you? You know thy Starfish. Yes you do.

Like two nuts in a shell together. I, personally, am drawn to greyscale photography, allowing me to bring my own desires and feelings along for the ride. The Jan Saudek stuff that Marxist posted a while ago sparked an interest in myself...the hand colored photographs were amazing. I has seen the technique before but never with such grit and welcome vagueness.

***

Nessus said:
You are an intense watcher, yes? It is good. These scenes draw me in, it is interesting to me, yes I know it would not be to others. The racial one is special to me.

I love all art, my friend, all, it matters not whether it be cinema, photography or the pencil. As long as it touches me

Oh yes, art is personal and unique to each of us; our minds, our eyes, our hearts. This morning, while looking at punk albums, i was reminded of an image that ended up landing the Dead Kennedy's in court for pornography/obscenity. It is viewed as art in most minds but it shows how different things are. The HR Giger pic inserted below.

It is indeed whatever gets inside out heads. For me, something like Robert Indiana is brilliant but its hack work to others. Much of the fun in exploring art is finding both what makes you click and what doesnt...both are telling.

Natalie Nessus · Dec 30, 2001

modest mouse said:
Oh yes, art is personal and unique to each of us; our minds, our eyes, our hearts. This morning, while looking at punk albums, i was reminded of an image that ended up landing the Dead Kennedy's in court for pornography/obscenity. It is viewed as art in most minds but it shows how different things are. The HR Giger pic inserted below.

It is indeed whatever gets inside out heads. For me, something like Robert Indiana is brilliant but its hack work to others. Much of the fun in exploring art is finding both what makes you click and what doesnt...both are telling.

Yes, Geiger is wonderful

I have hosted an exhibition for his work, it is popular but discomforting for many people which is good

I only post my erotic tastes here, I have many others from my work and my passions

Art is everywhere and we have, I think, a stupid view of the art in the west where we divide into many parts, Fine Arts, Crafts, Trades and others. While in Japan it is all art, the keys in the lock on the door are art, yes?

I am talking too much for me

Art is apassion and when you are passionate, you see it always

Guest · Dec 30, 2001

Oh no, no, no, no please keep posting. Am loving the art and lord wish someone would tie me up like that just once.

Merci Nessus

Erotic Art:Saudelli

Gypsy Soul

Gypsy Soul

Gypsy Soul

Gypsy Soul

Gypsy Soul

Gypsy Soul

Gypsy Soul

trouble

Gypsy Soul

Gypsy Soul

Looking for the way

orgasmic inDucktion

Gypsy Soul

Literotica Guru

Meating People is Easy

Looking for the way

Mind fucked and broken

Gypsy Soul

Mind fucked and broken

Gypsy Soul

Literotica Guru

Gypsy Soul

Meating People is Easy

Gypsy Soul

Guest

Guest

Similar threads