trysail
Catch Me Who Can
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2005
- Posts
- 25,593
I'm so sorry to disappoint you but I have a firm rule against engaging with trolls and morons— that would be you.
Bugger off.
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/719/509/0ad.png
https://anotherschwab.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/miss-the-point.pnghttps://media.giphy.com/media/a6WgZGYRLzp5K/giphy.gif
https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/paris-climate-agreement-dead-anim1.gif?w=220&h=126&crop=1
When a person relies on gif's to continually make their points it shows a lack of imagination and intelligence.
You really should be more circumspect and respectful— people will know EXACTLY to whom you are referring.
Are there limits on which laws religious beliefs are exempt from? If your faith requires you to strangle mongoloids, can you whip out the garrote now?
https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/ijH8PnyS2vzc/v0/-1x-1.jpg
Index Providers Rule The World— For Now, At Least
ht tps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-27/index-providers-rule-the-world-for-now-at-least
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-27/index-providers-rule-the-world-for-now-at-least
____________________________
The man has committed frickin' heresy on NPR!!
They'll never let David N. Schwartz on NPR again !!
From NPR's 13.7 Cosmos & Culture:
Commentary on Science and Society
What Would Enrico Fermi Think of Science Today?
by David N. Schwartz
https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2...hat-would-enrico-fermi-think-of-science-today
December 5, 2017
"...At the intersection of science and public policy, on issues like climate change and genetic engineering, Fermi would almost certainly be more reticent. He never enjoyed debating the complex issues of his own day involving science and public policy. He served reluctantly as a government adviser on science policy, but he was always happier in the lab or in the classroom where the physics issues were simpler and answers were either right or wrong.
It's hard to say whether Fermi would be persuaded by the science behind climate change. The models used to simulate climate change are extremely complex and have embedded within them uncertainties that have made some very bright physicists, like Princeton's Freeman Dyson, skeptical of the models themselves..."
It's hard to say whether Fermi would be persuaded by the science behind climate change. The models used to simulate climate change are extremely complex and have embedded within them uncertainties that have made some very bright physicists, like Princeton's Freeman Dyson, skeptical of the models themselves..."
___________________________________
..the assertion that humans have caused most of the recent global warming has not been proven. The calculation of human influence on climate is based only on unvalidated climate models as described here and here. In fact, most climate models cannot model the global warming from 1910 to 1945. If they can’t hindcast known global warming, how can they accurately forecast it? Forecasting natural warming is obviously critical to computing the magnitude of man’s impact, so we must remain skeptical of any calculation of man’s influence...
...The New York Times likes to say that more people work in the solar power generation industry than in the coal power generation industry. This sounds great until you realize that in 2016, according to EIA, solar produced 0.9% of our electricity with 373,807 people, versus coal which produced 30% of our electricity with 160,119 people. Productivity growth is where our standard of living comes from, switching to solar is going in the wrong direction. Its apparent that the NY Times is ignorant of basic economic principles. See the New York Times graphic in figure 3. What this means, is that it takes 83 solar workers to produce the same amount of electricity as 1 coal worker. This only makes economic sense if the solar workers are paid 1.2% of a coal worker’s pay...
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/12/14/calculating-the-cost-of-global-warming/...The New York Times likes to say that more people work in the solar power generation industry than in the coal power generation industry. This sounds great until you realize that in 2016, according to EIA, solar produced 0.9% of our electricity with 373,807 people, versus coal which produced 30% of our electricity with 160,119 people. Productivity growth is where our standard of living comes from, switching to solar is going in the wrong direction. Its apparent that the NY Times is ignorant of basic economic principles. See the New York Times graphic in figure 3. What this means, is that it takes 83 solar workers to produce the same amount of electricity as 1 coal worker. This only makes economic sense if the solar workers are paid 1.2% of a coal worker’s pay...
-Andy May
_______________________
Reassessing biases and other uncertainties in sea-surface temperature observations measured in situ since 1850,
part 1: measurement and sampling uncertainties
J. J. Kennedy, N.A. Rayner, R.O. Smith, D.E. Parker, and M. Saunby
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadsst3/part_1_figinline.pdf
________________________
"They say good judgment comes from experience … and experience comes from bad judgment."
-Willis Eschenbach
________________________
https://co2islife.wordpress.com/201...-scientific-talking-points-to-win-the-debate/
ht tps://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/01/16/how-to-discuss-global-warming-with-a-climate-alarmist-scientific-talking-points-to-win-the-debate/
https://co2islife.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/climate_predictions.jpg
_________________________
Too good to pass up.
https://defyccc.com/wp-content/uploads/ny-times-lies-1.png
I'm so sorry to disappoint you but I have a firm rule against engaging with trolls and morons— that would be you.
Bugger off.
http://forum.literotica.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2022918&d=1501469014
_____________________
Why on earth do you see the need to post this here? What does this have to do with erotica?
sr71plt said:I must admit I kept reading through this to see where the erotica started--and didn't find it. Glad the feedback was excellent though.
Congratulations on making yourself the biggest asshole in all of Lit.
Nobody does it as well as you do.
Nobody does it as well as you do.
sr71plt
_____________________
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/climate.jpg?itok=Pnp15CnM
Last edited: