Either WE win, or YOU cheated!

[Le Jacquelope]

Hey redneck dickless boy, tell me, do you know the relationship between exit polls and actual election results? Do you know the historical accuracy of exit polls? Do you know what the relation was between exit polls and the actual results in 2004? What about the Republican phone jamming campaign in 2004 that actually resulted in convictions? And how's that Diebold voting machine security?

What? Why is everyone suddenly shutting up??? Aw poor thread...

 

[Oliver Clozoff]

what will YOU do for ME when I am proved CORRECT?

Whatever you want.

But the chances of the Repubs picking up seats in the Senate are infintessimal.

You're delusional, but loveably so, bizzybee.

 

[busybody..]

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/pictures/06.11.05.Election2006-X.gif

 

[Le Jacquelope]

The Republican Party is now putting $2.1 million into robocalls to voters that sound like they're coming from Democrats.

The Republicans are in direct violation of FCC regulations which require that the caller's identity must be stated at the beginning of the message.

The robocall starts as 'Hello. I'm calling with information about (insert Democratic Candidate here'. If you hang up, you'll receive 18 more calls until you pretty much assume that it's coming from a Democratic candidate and get pissed off at him/her.

The Republicans have already acknowledged this behavior is wrong:
http://www.wmur.com/news/10237386/detail.html

but only for people who are on the Do Not Call registry.

There's more information at:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/co...ose_nasty_telephone_calls_from_the_campaigns/
also:
http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/15898729.htm


Republicans are also in trouble in New Mexico for giving false polling place information to registered Democrats.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/koat/20061106/lo_koat/10255016
http://www.newschannel10.com/global/story.asp?s=5637114
http://www.koat.com/politics/10253453/detail.html?rss=alb&psp=news

 

[busybody..]

the CHEATING begins

Civic Groups Want 1-Day Absentee Ballot Extension

Nov 6, 2006 2:13 pm US/Eastern

Suzanne Collins

(WJZ/AP) Baltimore, MD Several top Maryland Democrats are urging Governor Robert Ehrlich to push for an extension of the deadline for voters to postmark absentee ballots.

In a letter to Ehrlich dated Sunday, the group asked the governor to instruct his appointees on the Maryland Board of
Elections to allow ballots postmarked on election day to be counted. The current deadline is today.

The letter cites shortages in absentee ballots because of the high number of requests this year.

The letter comes on the heels of a similar request by a coalition of attorneys’ groups and civil rights organizations.

Those groups said they would consider going to court today if the Board of Elections didn’t extend the deadline.

A spokesman for Ehrlich says the governor has not taken a position on the request and says it’s entirely a decision for the election board.

Governor Ehrlich and his running mate, Kristin Cox voted by paper ballot and encouraged others to do so. But the massive number of requests means some absentee ballots arrived at homes late, the ACLU the NAACP say that’s a problem.

WJZ’S Suzanne Collins spoke to a member of the ACLU. "Many people will not receive them until they get home from work, by that time they need to take it to a main post office to get it postmarked in time. It’s a logistical nightmare, that’s not necessary." said Meredith Curtis.

The NAACP has a voter hotline to respond to problems voting and the U.S. Attorney’s office has said people should call the FBI if they suspect fraud.




It looks like Mr. Steele must be pulling ahead in the polls.



Why can’t Democrats ever play by the rules? And why is it always the same "civic groups," the ACLU and NAACP, doing their bidding?

And why is the NAACP standing in the way of the advancement of a black man?

 

[busybody..]

The Republican Party is now putting $2.1 million into robocalls to voters that sound like they're coming from Democrats.

The Republicans are in direct violation of FCC regulations which require that the caller's identity must be stated at the beginning of the message.

The robocall starts as 'Hello. I'm calling with information about (insert Democratic Candidate here'. If you hang up, you'll receive 18 more calls until you pretty much assume that it's coming from a Democratic candidate and get pissed off at him/her.

The Republicans have already acknowledged this behavior is wrong:
http://www.wmur.com/news/10237386/detail.html

but only for people who are on the Do Not Call registry.

There's more information at:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/co...ose_nasty_telephone_calls_from_the_campaigns/
also:
http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/15898729.htm


Republicans are also in trouble in New Mexico for giving false polling place information to registered Democrats.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/koat/20061106/lo_koat/10255016
http://www.newschannel10.com/global/story.asp?s=5637114
http://www.koat.com/politics/10253453/detail.html?rss=alb&psp=news

Good!

I hope they take it NATIONWIDE

 

[TWB]

take it to the BANK

Repoz gain seats!

So, if they don't are you going to call republicans who file suit idiots? Reprobate-os? Something similar, or will it be that the Democrats cheated?

 

[busybody..]

Repoz lose

they go home and take the loss

only DUMZ CHEAT and SUE!

 

[Kandi]

Who Posted?
Total Posts: 33
User Name Posts
busybody 18
Oliver Clozoff 3
garbage can 3
LovingTongue 2
Cap’n AMatrixca 2
KravMaga 1
SeanH 1
TWB 1
Ulaven_Demorte 1
Emerald Eyed 1



An so it goes.

 

[busybody..]

and the point is what?

 

[Killswitch]

Who Posted?
Total Posts: 33
User Name Posts
busybody 18
Oliver Clozoff 3
garbage can 3
LovingTongue 2
Cap’n AMatrixca 2
KravMaga 1
SeanH 1
TWB 1
Ulaven_Demorte 1
Emerald Eyed 1



An so it goes.

Yeah but cut BB a break. Theres actually five people in that cranium fighting to speak. So really he's not talking to himself in effect.

 

[Sean]

and the point is what?

The point is, that when I'm not arguing with you, nobody else gives a fuck.

 

[TWB]

Repoz lose

they go home and take the loss

only DUMZ CHEAT and SUE!

Uh huh...

I lost, I am suing!

 

[busybody..]

wow

you found ONE

and that case was so obviously a fraud

but still after ONE decision by the Courts the Repoh stopped

unlike Soreloserman et al

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Uh huh...

I lost, I am suing!

Ouch. You bitch slapped him and made him call you daddy.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Good!

I hope they take it NATIONWIDE

So busybody has effectively said he hopes the GOP commits voter fraud all over the country.

Exactly what about democracy do you stand for, bb?

 

[TWB]

wow

you found ONE

and that case was so obviously a fraud

but still after ONE decision by the Courts the Repoh stopped

unlike Soreloserman et al

Would you like to lay down a bet about Republicans suing if they lose by thin margins?

I bet they will all have "plaintiff" after their name.

 

[Le Jacquelope]

Would you like to lay down a bet about Republicans suing if they lose by thin margins?

I bet they will all have "plaintiff" after their name.

Suddenly they'll be declaring that Diebold voting machines are insecure!

 

[Peregrinator]

So busybody has effectively said he hopes the GOP commits voter fraud all over the country.

Exactly what about democracy do you stand for, bb?

Nothing. He doesn't believe in following laws or any other system of ethics or morals, as long as it's his side that's performing the act. He has a wonderful ability to justify evil performed by what he sees as his team. The end justifies the means for our Unca DizzyBloody, Moral Dreidel Boy Extraordinaire.

 

[busybody..]

a vote for a Dum is a vote for a terrorist

therefore ALL measures to prevent that is JUSTIFIABLE!

 

[busybody..]

FROM WND'S JERUSALEM BUREAU
Mideast terror leaders
to U.S.: Vote Democrat
Withdrawal from Iraq would embolden
jihadists to destroy Israel, America

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: November 2, 2006
9:27 a.m. Eastern


By Aaron Klein
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com




JERUSALEM – Everybody has an opinion about next Tuesday's midterm congressional election in the U.S. – including senior terrorist leaders interviewed by WND who say they hope Americans sweep the Democrats into power because of the party's position on withdrawing from Iraq, a move, as they see it, that ensures victory for the worldwide Islamic resistance.

The terrorists told WorldNetDaily an electoral win for the Democrats would prove to them Americans are "tired."

They rejected statements from some prominent Democrats in the U.S. that a withdrawal from Iraq would end the insurgency, explaining an evacuation would prove resistance works and would compel jihadists to continue fighting until America is destroyed.

They said a withdrawal would also embolden their own terror groups to enhance "resistance" against Israel.

"Of course Americans should vote Democrat," Jihad Jaara, a senior member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group and the infamous leader of the 2002 siege of Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity, told WND.

(Story continues below)


"This is why American Muslims will support the Democrats, because there is an atmosphere in America that encourages those who want to withdraw from Iraq. It is time that the American people support those who want to take them out of this Iraqi mud," said Jaara, speaking to WND from exile in Ireland, where he was sent as part of an internationally brokered deal that ended the church siege.

Jaara was the chief in Bethlehem of the Brigades, the declared "military wing" of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah party.

Together with the Islamic Jihad terror group, the Brigades has taken responsibility for every suicide bombing inside Israel the past two years, including an attack in Tel Aviv in April that killed American teenager Daniel Wultz and nine Israelis.

Muhammad Saadi, a senior leader of Islamic Jihad in the northern West Bank town of Jenin, said the Democrats' talk of withdrawal from Iraq makes him feel "proud."

"As Arabs and Muslims we feel proud of this talk," he told WND. "Very proud from the great successes of the Iraqi resistance. This success that brought the big superpower of the world to discuss a possible withdrawal."

Abu Abdullah, a leader of Hamas' military wing in the Gaza Strip, said the policy of withdrawal "proves the strategy of the resistance is the right strategy against the occupation."

"We warned the Americans that this will be their end in Iraq," said Abu Abdullah, considered one of the most important operational members of Hamas' Izzedine al-Qassam Martyrs Brigades, Hamas' declared "resistance" department. "They did not succeed in stealing Iraq's oil, at least not at a level that covers their huge expenses. They did not bring stability. Their agents in the [Iraqi] regime seem to have no chance to survive if the Americans withdraw."

Abu Ayman, an Islamic Jihad leader in Jenin, said he is "emboldened" by those in America who compare the war in Iraq to Vietnam.

"[The mujahedeen fighters] brought the Americans to speak for the first time seriously and sincerely that Iraq is becoming a new Vietnam and that they should fix a schedule for their withdrawal from Iraq," boasted Abu Ayman.

The terror leaders spoke as the debate regarding the future of America's war in Iraq has perhaps become the central theme of midterm elections, with most Democrats urging a timetable for withdrawal and Republicans mostly advocating staying the course in Iraq.

President Bush has even said he would send more troops if Gen. George Casey, the top U.S. commander in Baghdad, said they are needed to stabilize the region

The debate became especially poignant following remarks by Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., the 2004 presidential candidate who voted in support of the war in Iraq. Earlier this week he intimated American troops are uneducated, and it is the uneducated who "get stuck in Iraq."

Kerry, under intense pressure from fellow Democrats, now says his remarks were a "botched joke."

Terror leaders reject Nancy Pelosi's comments on Iraqi insurgency

Many Democratic politicians and some from the Republican Party have stated a withdrawal from Iraq would end the insurgency there.

In a recent interview with CBS's "60 Minutes," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, stated, "The jihadists (are) in Iraq. But that doesn't mean we stay there. They'll stay there as long as we're there."

Pelosi would become House speaker if the Democrats win the majority of seats in next week's elections.

WND read Pelosi's remarks to the terror leaders, who unanimously rejected her contention an American withdrawal would end the insurgency.

Islamic Jihad's Saadi, laughing, stated, "There is no chance that the resistance will stop."

He said an American withdrawal from Iraq would "prove the resistance is the most important tool and that this tool works. The victory of the Iraqi revolution will mark an important step in the history of the region and in the attitude regarding the United States."

Jihad Jaara said an American withdrawal would "mark the beginning of the collapse of this tyrant empire (America)."

"Therefore, a victory in Iraq would be a greater defeat for America than in Vietnam."

Jaara said vacating Iraq would also "reinforce Palestinian resistance organizations, especially from the moral point of view. But we also learn from these (insurgency) movements militarily. We look and learn from them."

Hamas' Abu Abdullah argued a withdrawal from Iraq would "convince those among the Palestinians who still have doubts in the efficiency of the resistance."

"The victory of the resistance in Iraq would prove once more that when the will and the faith are applied victory is not only a slogan. We saw that in Lebanon (during Israel's confrontation against Hezbollah there in July and August); we saw it in Gaza (after Israel withdrew from the territory last summer) and we will see it everywhere there is occupation," Abdullah said.

While the terror leaders each independently compelled American citizens to vote for Democratic candidates, not all believed the Democrats would actually carry out a withdrawal from Iraq.

Saadi stated, "Unfortunately I think those who are speaking about a withdrawal will not do so when they are in power and these promises will remain electoral slogans. It is not enough to withdraw from Iraq. They must withdraw from Afghanistan and from every Arab and Muslim land they occupy or have bases."

He called both Democrats and Republicans "agents of the Zionist lobby in the U.S."

Abu Abdullah commented once Democrats are in power "the question is whether such a courageous leadership can [withdraw]. I am afraid that even after the American people will elect those who promise to leave Iraq, the U.S. will not do so. I tell the American people vote for withdrawal. Abandon Israel if you want to save America. Now will this Happen? I do not believe it."

Still Jihad Jaara said the alternative is better than Bush's party.

"Bush is a sick person, an alcoholic person that has no control of what is going on around him. He calls to send more troops but will very soon get to the conviction that the violence and terror that his war machine is using in Iraq will never impose policies and political regimes in the Arab world."

 

[Cap’n AMatrixca]

Winning hearts and changing minds?

 

[Jailhouse]

I hate myself for liking you so much, BusyBody.

 

[busybody..]

Instead of spending so much time here, Jail

You outa make more of an effort to get laid

 

[Jailhouse]

Instead of spending so much time here, Jail

You outa make more of an effort to get laid

Haha! Thanks for caring, man.

I'll get laid when I'm good and ready. Until then, I'm just gonna keep postin' away.

BTW, I'm a little hurt you didn't use any caps in your post to me.