I'm sure in the day or so that I didn't post someone spoke about the Supreme Courts decision in the medical marijuana issue but there were thoughts of mine that I wanted to share.
I'm the last guy to defend Clarence Thomas on most things but the way he got jumped on bothered me. His ruling stated that the current law states that there is no recognition that Marijuana has medicinal purposes. He was dead right about that. No ifs, ands or buts. Yet in the article at Salon that I read the writer tried to frame it as if Thomas said those words himself. That Thomas feels that Pot doesn't help the author with his Chemo. The reason that the fallout over this decision bothers me is that people miss the bigger picture. Americans need the Court to uphold the law. Analyze and interpret the law. Not create it. Not strike down the parts that they have moral disagreements with. With a Republican majority on the bench it is crucial that they don't decide which laws they like and which they don't. It is crucial to Roe v. Wade and other important laws on the books that the Republicans on the bench don't become activists.
I disagree with the law but not the ruling. Yazikes
I'm the last guy to defend Clarence Thomas on most things but the way he got jumped on bothered me. His ruling stated that the current law states that there is no recognition that Marijuana has medicinal purposes. He was dead right about that. No ifs, ands or buts. Yet in the article at Salon that I read the writer tried to frame it as if Thomas said those words himself. That Thomas feels that Pot doesn't help the author with his Chemo. The reason that the fallout over this decision bothers me is that people miss the bigger picture. Americans need the Court to uphold the law. Analyze and interpret the law. Not create it. Not strike down the parts that they have moral disagreements with. With a Republican majority on the bench it is crucial that they don't decide which laws they like and which they don't. It is crucial to Roe v. Wade and other important laws on the books that the Republicans on the bench don't become activists.
I disagree with the law but not the ruling. Yazikes

