Easy on the Hooptedoodle

Seattle Zack

Count each one
Joined
Aug 29, 2003
Posts
1,128
WRITERS ON WRITING
"Easy on the Hooptedoodle"

By Elmore Leonard

These are rules I've picked up along the way to help me remain invisible when I'm writing a book, to help me show rather than tell what's taking place in the story. If you have a facility for language and imagery and the sound of your voice pleases you, invisibility is not what you are after, and you can skip the rules. Still, you might look them over.

1. Never open a book with weather.
If it's only to create atmosphere, and not a character's reaction to the weather, you don't want to go on too long. The reader is apt to leaf ahead looking for people. There are exceptions. If you happen to be Barry Lopez, who has more ways to describe ice and snow than an Eskimo, you can do all the weather reporting you want.

2. Avoid prologues.
They can be annoying, especially a prologue following an introduction that comes after a foreword. But these are ordinarily found in nonfiction. A prologue in a novel is backstory, and you can drop it in anywhere you want.

There is a prologue in John Steinbeck's Sweet Thursday, but it's O.K. because a character in the book makes the point of what my rules are all about. He says: "I like a lot of talk in a book and I don't like to have nobody tell me what the guy that's talking looks like. I want to figure out what he looks like from the way he talks...figure out what the guy's thinking from what he says. I like some description but not too much of that...Sometimes I want a book to break loose with a bunch of hooptedoodle...Spin up some pretty words maybe or sing a little song with language. That's nice. But I wish it was set aside so I don't have to read it. I don't want hooptedoodle to get mixed up with the story."

3. Never use a verb other than "said" to carry dialogue.
The line of dialogue belongs to the character; the verb is the writer sticking his nose in. But said is far less intrusive than grumbled, gasped, cautioned, lied. I once noticed Mary McCarthy ending a line of dialogue with "she asseverated," and had to stop reading to get the dictionary.

4. Never use an adverb to modify the verb "said"...
...he admonished gravely. To use an adverb this way (or almost any way) is a mortal sin. The writer is now exposing himself in earnest, using a word that distracts and can interrupt the rhythm of the exchange. I have a character in one of my books tell how she used to write historical romances "full of rape and adverbs."

5. Keep your exclamation points under control.
You are allowed no more than two or three per 100,000 words of prose. If you have the knack of playing with exclaimers the way Tom Wolfe does, you can throw them in by the handful.

6. Never use the words "suddenly" or "all hell broke loose."
This rule doesn't require an explanation. I have noticed that writers who use "suddenly" tend to exercise less control in the application of exclamation points.

7. Use regional dialect, patois, sparingly.
Once you start spelling words in dialogue phonetically and loading the page with apostrophes, you won't be able to stop. Notice the way Annie Proulx captures the flavor of Wyoming voices in her book of short stories Close Range.

8. Avoid detailed descriptions of characters.
Which Steinbeck covered. In Ernest Hemingway's "Hills Like White Elephants" what do the "American and the girl with him" look like? "She had taken off her hat and put it on the table." That's the only reference to a physical description in the story, and yet we see the couple and know them by their tones of voice, with not one adverb in sight.

9. Don't go into great detail describing places and things.
Unless you're Margaret Atwood and can paint scenes with language or write landscapes in the style of Jim Harrison. But even if you're good at it, you don't want descriptions that bring the action, the flow of the story, to a standstill.

And finally:

10. Try to leave out the part that readers tend to skip.
A rule that came to mind in 1983. Think of what you skip reading a novel: thick paragraphs of prose you can see have too many words in them. What the writer is doing, he's writing, perpetrating hooptedoodle, perhaps taking another shot at the weather, or has gone into the character's head, and the reader either knows what the guy's thinking or doesn't care. I'll bet you don't skip dialogue.

My most important rule is one that sums up the 10.

If it sounds like writing, I rewrite it.
Or, if proper usage gets in the way, it may have to go. I can't allow what we learned in English composition to disrupt the sound and rhythm of the narrative. It's my attempt to remain invisible, not distract the reader from the story with obvious writing. (Joseph Conrad said something about words getting in the way of what you want to say.)

If I write in scenes and always from the point of view of a particular character -- the one whose view best brings the scene to life -- I'm able to concentrate on the voices of the characters telling you who they are and how they feel about what they see and what's going on, and I'm nowhere in sight.

What Steinbeck did in Sweet Thursday was title his chapters as an indication, though obscure, of what they cover. "Whom the Gods Love They Drive Nuts" is one, "Lousy Wednesday" another. The third chapter is titled "Hooptedoodle 1" and the 38th chapter "Hooptedoodle 2" as warnings to the reader, as if Steinbeck is saying: "Here's where you'll see me taking flights of fancy with my writing, and it won't get in the way of the story. Skip them if you want."

Sweet Thursday came out in 1954, when I was just beginning to be published, and I've never forgotten that prologue.

Did I read the hooptedoodle chapters? Every word.

Originally published in
New York Times
July 16, 2001
 
I have that saved on my hard drive, look it over on a regular bases, even quoted the first rule in the Great Hooker thread. One caution about #2, some hack named Brown started his last novel with a prologue, and I'm told "The Da Vinci Code" had pretty good sales.

Thanks, Zack.

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
 
Since I regularly violate Rules 3 and 4, and have been known to toy with number 6, I guess Elmore and I aren't in complete accord.

But he is who he is and I'm not. ;)

That's mighty good advice though. :D
 
TE999 said:
Since I regularly violate Rules 3 and 4, and have been known to toy with number 6, I guess Elmore and I aren't in complete accord.

But he is who he is and I'm not. ;)

That's mighty good advice though. :D
Suddenly, just before all hell broke loose, he sighed with bemused exasperation, "TE, you are such a rebel,"

Rumple Foreskin :cool:
 
Rumple Foreskin said:
Suddenly, just before all hell broke loose, he sighed with bemused exasperation, "TE, you are such a rebel,"

Rumple Foreskin :cool:

"What are you rebelling against, TE?"

"Whatta ya got?"

(pace' Marlon Brando) :D
 
I've broken every one of those rules (he confessed guiltily) but I love Leonard's style. I once read an interview with him where he said he writes his novel, edits half of it out, reworks the parts that need it, then edits another 30% out.

If you've ever read one of his books there's not an ouce of fat on them, and he can carry on a two-page conversation between two people without a single dialogue tag, and you never loose track of who's speaking.
 
11) Real Writers Don't Need No Stinkin' Writing Rules
It's best never to annoy writers with writer's rules as they have usually read enough best selling, classic novels to show you that every single rule can be broken to excellent effect and without running the risk of stopping a book from being published, popular or a classic.

12) Real Writers Break Every Stinkin' Writing Rule
If you really know how to write, you know how and when and why to break all the rules and so don't need no rules. See #11.

:cool:
 
I think I learned all of those rules just by reading the man. :rose:

On the other hand, I do relish the Authorial Voice once in a while. lately, I've been thinking about-- telling the story, as a raconteur. I was very pleased by a line I wrote recently;

"They were doing everything!" she said, with more emphasis than italics can possibly convey.

(noticing the exclamation point, I admit there were a fair number of 'em in that exchange.)
 
3113 said:
11) Real Writers Don't Need No Stinkin' Writing Rules
It's best never to annoy writers with writer's rules as they have usually read enough best selling, classic novels to show you that every single rule can be broken to excellent effect and without running the risk of stopping a book from being published, popular or a classic.

12) Real Writers Break Every Stinkin' Writing Rule
If you really know how to write, you know how and when and why to break all the rules and so don't need no rules. See #11.

:cool:

Now Those are the rules that I agree with.
 
TheeGoatPig said:
Now Those are the rules that I agree with.
To be fair, Leonard offered either an example of what he meant, or an example of the rule being broken effectively, in most of these...


They're more like guidelines, really. ;)
 
Stella_Omega said:
To be fair, Leonard offered either an example of what he meant, or an example of the rule being broken effectively, in most of these...


They're more like guidelines, really. ;)

Eh, whatever. I haven't written anything since October anyway.
 
3113 said:
11) Real Writers Don't Need No Stinkin' Writing Rules
It's best never to annoy writers with writer's rules as they have usually read enough best selling, classic novels to show you that every single rule can be broken to excellent effect and without running the risk of stopping a book from being published, popular or a classic.

12) Real Writers Break Every Stinkin' Writing Rule
If you really know how to write, you know how and when and why to break all the rules and so don't need no rules. See #11.

:cool:

I'm in.

To me, writing is like creating a booby trap. You can follow the rules, but it's no surprise then. :D
 
Seattle Zack said:
10. Try to leave out the part that readers tend to skip.
A rule that came to mind in 1983. Think of what you skip reading a novel: thick paragraphs of prose you can see have too many words in them. What the writer is doing, he's writing, perpetrating hooptedoodle, perhaps taking another shot at the weather, or has gone into the character's head, and the reader either knows what the guy's thinking or doesn't care. I'll bet you don't skip dialogue.

This is the part I need to learn.
 
Back
Top