Kathykitten
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2008
- Posts
- 125
NB!: This is not about whether a sub should earn the orgasm or not, we all mostly agree they should. This is about how you go about when you put this in words, and how it can negatively or positively affect the sub and enforce her mindset!
I wanted to start a debate on this, as I have been pondering on the subject for a while! Maybe I am out on a limb here, but I’d really like some thoughts on this =)
It is very common that a submissive needs to earn the privilege to cum, but what do we put in the mind of a sub when we express it verbally by using words such as “earn”?
Let’s explore!
The one in charge is always in control of the submissives’ pleasure. the sub has slowly given the stronger part trust and begun to let go of the control of their own life and actions. They have begun to truly enjoy the sovereignity of the one charge. The master or mistress gets to decide: when, where, how, how much etc, often depending on the submissives’ performance of the day. But what happens when you verbally explain to a slut that they need to earn it?
Let’s take an example:
“You need to earn this orgasm, if you do really well you might deserve it”. This is naturally what the Dom feels and has in mind (and what is correct), but what will the submissive think now? Perhaps something like this? :
"okey, its up to me… my actions, I need to act and take control to make this happen" But wait a minute… Take control? Can this put the sub back in the control of his / her own pleasure?
Part of the biggest joy for some subs is to relinquish control and take orders, loosing complete power over a situation. To be able to beg and still not receive, for no particular reason at all.
Is it not possible that by using such terminology we force the sub to retake the control we keep asking him / her to relinquish for us? And thus create an emotional conflict?
We say it is to help them learn to serve, and a submissives greatest focus should always be to serve. He /she should indeed have to earn their pleasure and orgasms. While this is entirely true, perhaps by shifting our words around we can avoid some of the conflicting subconscious signals, but still enforce their servitude? Could these be good examples of simple shifts that might not conflict in the same way? :
“You could get to orgasm tonight if it would please me.” You still indicate that you want their utmost, but you dont suggest that you want anything else but their total commitment and submitting.
Or how about this one, simply hearing: (and I have found this to be far more of a mindfuck and turn-on than when the master leaves the responsibility with me)
“no, I don’t feel like it, hold back slut.” No particular reason or motivation behind it other than masters complete control. There should never have to be a reason behind what he does, as a sub it is the only duty to submit totally and fully to master or mistress' orders and control. The very thrill for many is having the power over the situation completely taken away, left to the mercy and musings of another person. This particular example also tells me that if I have not been allowed to cum it does not mean that I have done poorly, or failed, something which to a sub can often be downright depressing or make them wonder what they are doing wrong.
My question is: Do you think that verbalising the need to earn could set back the subs process of relinquishing power and control? Not the fact that the submissive needs to earn it, but the way it is expressed?
Ps: Could it be that this varies a lot from sub to sub, that a very feisty and strong minded sub will enjoy far more “earning” it?
I wanted to start a debate on this, as I have been pondering on the subject for a while! Maybe I am out on a limb here, but I’d really like some thoughts on this =)
It is very common that a submissive needs to earn the privilege to cum, but what do we put in the mind of a sub when we express it verbally by using words such as “earn”?
Let’s explore!
The one in charge is always in control of the submissives’ pleasure. the sub has slowly given the stronger part trust and begun to let go of the control of their own life and actions. They have begun to truly enjoy the sovereignity of the one charge. The master or mistress gets to decide: when, where, how, how much etc, often depending on the submissives’ performance of the day. But what happens when you verbally explain to a slut that they need to earn it?
Let’s take an example:
“You need to earn this orgasm, if you do really well you might deserve it”. This is naturally what the Dom feels and has in mind (and what is correct), but what will the submissive think now? Perhaps something like this? :
"okey, its up to me… my actions, I need to act and take control to make this happen" But wait a minute… Take control? Can this put the sub back in the control of his / her own pleasure?
Part of the biggest joy for some subs is to relinquish control and take orders, loosing complete power over a situation. To be able to beg and still not receive, for no particular reason at all.
Is it not possible that by using such terminology we force the sub to retake the control we keep asking him / her to relinquish for us? And thus create an emotional conflict?
We say it is to help them learn to serve, and a submissives greatest focus should always be to serve. He /she should indeed have to earn their pleasure and orgasms. While this is entirely true, perhaps by shifting our words around we can avoid some of the conflicting subconscious signals, but still enforce their servitude? Could these be good examples of simple shifts that might not conflict in the same way? :
“You could get to orgasm tonight if it would please me.” You still indicate that you want their utmost, but you dont suggest that you want anything else but their total commitment and submitting.
Or how about this one, simply hearing: (and I have found this to be far more of a mindfuck and turn-on than when the master leaves the responsibility with me)
“no, I don’t feel like it, hold back slut.” No particular reason or motivation behind it other than masters complete control. There should never have to be a reason behind what he does, as a sub it is the only duty to submit totally and fully to master or mistress' orders and control. The very thrill for many is having the power over the situation completely taken away, left to the mercy and musings of another person. This particular example also tells me that if I have not been allowed to cum it does not mean that I have done poorly, or failed, something which to a sub can often be downright depressing or make them wonder what they are doing wrong.
My question is: Do you think that verbalising the need to earn could set back the subs process of relinquishing power and control? Not the fact that the submissive needs to earn it, but the way it is expressed?
Ps: Could it be that this varies a lot from sub to sub, that a very feisty and strong minded sub will enjoy far more “earning” it?
Last edited: