Seems like the Pubs and RWs can't even accept something that basic any more.
What do you mean "anymore"? They have never liked it when turnout got too high.
Lol. Yes, That ‘voter suppression” narrative isn’t aging well.
About as well as the "men can get pregnant" meme.
the washington examiner ran with this as 'proof' of 'democrat wailing' and that there's really no voter suppression at work at all! way to spin it for the numpties. in reality, early voter turnout means people are fired up about something/s and mean to get their votes in asap in case election day lines are dreadful and might mean they have to wait umpteenth long or might not even get to vote before the venues close.
Oh rapey, you simpleton. Who here has claimed that?
The right here keeps saying that every single person on the left here is claiming that and is demanding answers.
He's channeling his inner cucker carlson.
It means their votes were not suppressed.
A rise in early voter turn does not mean anything, except a rise in early voter turn out. Trying to equate a rise of numbers of voters turning out to vote ( or a decrease turning out to vote) alone does not contain enough data to make a determination on what effect the change of voter access accomplished.
Except for all those "voter suppression laws" that were supposedly enacted just to keep this from happening.
Keep what from happening? Are you trying to claim that the election issues have nothing to do with voter turn out?
That they have produced a well-deserved backlash from those who can still vote does not in any way mean voter suppression wasn't the intention. And you know it.
No it does not mean the votes were not surpressed. Hell if one uses logic that increases the odds somewhat that their votes were being suppressed.
This is the more-than-welcome reaction against it. Congratulations.
Isn't it amazing that your view is that the Rights of voters hinge on a bunch of old white men screwing it up and letting those voters... er... vote? And vote in larger numbers than they used to? Without any hindrance?
It evaporated like a cup of water in the Sinai so like all good progressives with a narrative, they've swapped it out for the new narrative that the increased numbers are a backlash against the laws which supposedly would ensure such a backlash never occurs. You know, the typical muddy thinking liberal kind of story that doesn't make any sense once you get past the fee fees.
The only suppression going on is fraud suppression.
the only voter fraud I know of from the last election was at the hands of a couple Republicans.
