Dudes, do you like being called a faggot?

Although I have never been with a man, I hope that once or if I do, he will call me names during sex play. I have a submissive streak that really wants verbal play as well. Faggot, sissy, queer, pussy, any of those names are what he could call me, and if he collapses on top of my back after he has bred me, all he would have to say is "You're mine now" to drive me crazy.
 
I admit that it excites me and makes me quiver all over when he calls me his faggot, cum slut or little bitch... If I didn't naturally love taking dick from him on my knees or on all 4s, I wouldn't be his faggot...The way it makes me quiver when he refers to me as bitch, faggot, etc. is more than enough to convince me that what he says is true: I was naturally born a faggot and I'm HIS faggot now and for as long as he wants to use me.....
 
Question: If He calls you a "Faggot", what is He?
He's explained that to me a number of times... He receives the pleasure of RELEASE and DOES NOT reciprocate ... I provide a service for him that excites and fulfills my desire and purpose as his faggot...
 
I"m serious. I get aroused by someone calling me a fag. . .
OMG... I know that feeling... When the guy I service regularly or one of the very few locals who've used me in the past call me "faggot" I literally quiver inside... They don't say it in a mean way... It's more like they wink or smile just wanting me to acknowledge...
 
Question: If He calls you a "Faggot", what is He?
He explained that clearly after the first time he used me over 5 years ago... He's a divorced father of 1 subsequently having 2 long term girl friends (the 2nd one presently living with him)... He further explained that he has a powerful sex drive with certain masculine desires that need to be fulfilled... So far, none of them have had either the ability nor the desire to see to his needs... He doesn't see why he should deal with curbing his desires when having a personal faggot address his needs would solve the problem without unfairly badgering his woman to perform sex acts that she has no skill or interest in or would rather not... He said it's obvious that I instinctively desire to fulfill his needs both orally and via my boi pussy and I'm naturally talented at performing my purpose as his faggot... So it's a near perfect situation for both of us... He certainly has NO interest in reciprocating for any services I perform because he's a straight guy and always has been, while he could tell from the start that I'm a natural faggot and quite content doing what's in my nature...
 
I hate to say it but I’ve said it around my friends too much that the word is kinda diluted at this point, kinda makes me laugh at this point, even in the heat of the moment.
 
I hate to say it but I’ve said it around my friends too much that the word is kinda diluted at this point, kinda makes me laugh at this point, even in the heat of the moment.
I can understand that but my situation is a bit different... I can't remember the last time someone called me "faggot" in a public or semi public situation... The very few men who call me "faggot" or something similar are guy's who have used me of know a guy who has
 
I'm pretty sure it was my first time to be called a fag just a few days ago.

I really couldn't take offense with it. I couldn't even reply because I had several inches of his hard cock battering the back of my throat at the moment.

I must've liked it, it made me work all the harder on his beautiful tool.
Fag doesn’t do it for me. Only faggot. Go figure
 
Fag doesn’t do it for me. Only faggot. Go figure
I almost can't believe this but it's that way with me too... I'm lucky because he always calls me "faggot" or "sissy faggot"... I don't remember him ever calling me "fag"... I'd answer either way but "faggot" excites me more and I love answering to it.... Maybe it's because "fag" feels like more of a descriptive word while "faggot" feels like a nickname to me...
 
My wife is well aware of my gay activities. In fact they seem to excite her. Sometimes she likes to give me a hand job while teasing me about being a faggot. It excites both of us.
 
If he calls me faggot or anything similar, that's the end right there. I may even knee him in the balls before I walk away.
Same here. Not into the degrading/humiliating talk at all--total boner-killer for me.

"Cocksucker" could go either way, depending on the tone and the context.
 
Same here. Not into the degrading/humiliating talk at all--total boner-killer for me.

"Cocksucker" could go either way, depending on the tone and the context.
I am a "cock sucker", not a "cocksucker". It's something I do, not something I am.

Reading all the posts on various threads for a few years now, I think I perceive something, and I'd like other folks' thoughts on this idea. The classical sadism/masochism dichotomy requires either domination or submission as an erotic stimulus for arousal and climax. Of course, it is a spectrum with as many variations as there are individuals.

The idea that someone would call someone "cocksucker" or "faggot" in a degrading manner, and another person would not only tolerate it but would embrace it and be aroused by it, appears to me to fall under the S/M spectrum. The Dom/Sub relationship, the masculine/sissy relationship, etc. seem to be examples of the same.

I have no interest at all in anything relating to either dominating or submitting, being hypermasculine or being sissyfied, and all my life, being called a faggot, fag, or sissy were all highly insulting terms and still are. When I have sex with another man, it's two (or more) men enjoying each other as men, and that's the end of it.

I'm not criticizing anyone else's sexual proclivities. If you fall onto the S/M spectrum (according to my theory), more power to you. Enjoy your sexuality and be yourself.

Any thoughts on my S/M spectrum idea?
 
I am a "cock sucker", not a "cocksucker". It's something I do, not something I am.

Reading all the posts on various threads for a few years now, I think I perceive something, and I'd like other folks' thoughts on this idea. The classical sadism/masochism dichotomy requires either domination or submission as an erotic stimulus for arousal and climax. Of course, it is a spectrum with as many variations as there are individuals.

The idea that someone would call someone "cocksucker" or "faggot" in a degrading manner, and another person would not only tolerate it but would embrace it and be aroused by it, appears to me to fall under the S/M spectrum. The Dom/Sub relationship, the masculine/sissy relationship, etc. seem to be examples of the same.

I have no interest at all in anything relating to either dominating or submitting, being hypermasculine or being sissyfied, and all my life, being called a faggot, fag, or sissy were all highly insulting terms and still are. When I have sex with another man, it's two (or more) men enjoying each other as men, and that's the end of it.

I'm not criticizing anyone else's sexual proclivities. If you fall onto the S/M spectrum (according to my theory), more power to you. Enjoy your sexuality and be yourself.

Any thoughts on my S/M spectrum idea?
You asked so I would say your two-part theory falls flat on both accounts. Here is part one of my rebuttal:

At best I would call the first part of your theory semantics. Cock Sucker versus Cocksucker… really? To me that suggests you have some pent-up guilt and are trying to minimize it through overthinking vernacular. I say that because we are what we do, not the other way around. As an example, if I write a poem about pirates that doesn’t mean I am somehow a pirate swashbuckling on the high seas, that makes me a poet, but if I fix planes, then yes, I am an aircraft mechanic. Sure master, part-time and even hobby can be words we fix to the title of aircraft mechanic to more accurately denote the tenure spent, just like a person can be married to a woman and be a part time cocksucker and master aircraft mechanic, both.

My suggestion is to confront head on why you want to diffuse and minimize what you are, and what you are doing. Just like a garbage man trying to use the term “Refuse Tech”, while you cannot change how people treat you, you can change how you react to their words. Working on accepting what you are is far more effectual than trying to change other people’s words through semantics. I would suggest the Refuse Tech focus on how vital his career is to society, just as I would offer to others having shame about giving blowjobs to focus on how pleasurable it is to the person they are giving one too. Where is the shame in either?

You really are what you do.
 
Last edited:
I am a "cock sucker", not a "cocksucker". It's something I do, not something I am.

Reading all the posts on various threads for a few years now, I think I perceive something, and I'd like other folks' thoughts on this idea. The classical sadism/masochism dichotomy requires either domination or submission as an erotic stimulus for arousal and climax. Of course, it is a spectrum with as many variations as there are individuals.

The idea that someone would call someone "cocksucker" or "faggot" in a degrading manner, and another person would not only tolerate it but would embrace it and be aroused by it, appears to me to fall under the S/M spectrum. The Dom/Sub relationship, the masculine/sissy relationship, etc. seem to be examples of the same.

I have no interest at all in anything relating to either dominating or submitting, being hypermasculine or being sissyfied, and all my life, being called a faggot, fag, or sissy were all highly insulting terms and still are. When I have sex with another man, it's two (or more) men enjoying each other as men, and that's the end of it.

I'm not criticizing anyone else's sexual proclivities. If you fall onto the S/M spectrum (according to my theory), more power to you. Enjoy your sexuality and be yourself.

Any thoughts on my S/M spectrum idea?
As for the S/M theory that falls flat as well.

While it certainly can be S/M to call someone a faggot, what you are missing is that it can also be a term of endearment, no different than a wife calling her husband “Hun”, or a grandmother saying to her granddaughter “come over here dear”. My granddaughter means the world to me, and calling her a ruminant ungulate (deer) is hardly what I am conveying. Is that an S/M derivative? Hell no!!

While the word faggot might cause you to bristle, for others the word is such hyperbole that it becomes a term of endearment. But relationships are complex, so a particular name said to you might make you hate the person, but for another, might make another person smile. My uncle called my aunt “Lard Ass” for forty years and for her it was just his personality… and hers at play; neither cared. But I don’t suggest every man say that to his wife!

And that is my point, we cannot project how we react to a certain name onto others. It just might just be, the name they use is so vehemently offensive, that their relationship is such, it is not offensive at all but conveys intimacy between them. Only communication between the two can define that, and far be it from me to judge another couple's relationship. You shouldn't either.
 
Last edited:
Good girl oh when that is said hmmmm don't hate maggot but good girl or cocksucker well that will get me going
Oh honey... I instinctually answer to "faggot" because I AM his personal faggot.... But I DO love it when he calls me "bitch", "slutty gurl" "little pussy mouth" because it makes me feel even more feminine ...
 
Back
Top