Doesnt everyone>?

It's more like pointing out your hypocrisy.
I haven't been hypocritical.

Trump has the intestinal fortitude to do it in plain sight for all of America to see not some covert DOJ/FBI operation.
Militarizing the country.

Why is the DC police department down 800 officers? They were hemorrhaging police officers during the Biden years, why do you suppose that is?
Deflection

Why are DC crime statistics being fudged?
Deflection

There is a systemic crime problem in this country and it starts with legislators protecting criminals from prosecution. That's a blue cancer not red.
And so you want troops on every street.

It boggles the mind that the Capital of our country is a sanctuary city thumbing their nose to federal immigration policy. When the capital of our country can't abide by our own laws we have a problem. It would seem that DC would be the easiest town in the country to get a work card or a green card.
 
I prefer no troops on our streets.

You prefer troops on our streets.
I only prefer troops on the streets if it deters crime. Which is better? More crime or more troops? I may be biased. I've been assaulted and robbed.

If I'm doing nothing wrong, I've got nothing to worry about. Here's where people start "What-if"- ing.

At this point I foresee examples of how this kind of thinking leads to Authoritarianism. Or other things that end in -ism.

Has it affected you personally? Then maybe you have a right to bitch.
 
I only prefer troops on the streets if it deters crime. Which is better? More crime or more troops? I may be biased. I've been assaulted and robbed.
You might be. Crime doesn't end because of troops. It is paused until the troops leave. Liberties are also paused.

If I'm doing nothing wrong, I've got nothing to worry about. Here's where people start "What-if"- ing.
Why do you think you have a say?
They are targeting Democratic states because they are Democratic, not because of crime.

At this point I foresee examples of how this kind of thinking leads to Authoritarianism. Or other things that end in -ism.
Autocracy.

Has it affected you personally? Then maybe you have a right to bitch.
Lol...fuck off.

Study history for a bit...maybe you'll get it.
 
You might be. Crime doesn't end because of troops. It is paused until the troops leave. Liberties are also paused.


Why do you think you have a say?
They are targeting Democratic states because they are Democratic, not because of crime.


Autocracy.


Lol...fuck off.

Study history for a bit...maybe you'll get it.
If Guard soldiers are mobilized to augment federal and state law enforcement I'm OK with that. Trump sending, for example, the 82nd airborne for any reason other than an insurrection, uncontrollable civil disturbance, protecting federal installations, or in the case of national security, that is flat out wrong.
 
You might be. Crime doesn't end because of troops. It is paused until the troops leave. Liberties are also paused.


Why do you think you have a say?
They are targeting Democratic states because they are Democratic, not because of crime.


Autocracy.


Lol...fuck off.

Study history for a bit...maybe you'll get it.
You're an idiot.

First of all Trump is time limited by law as to how long he can deploy the Nat'l guard and the roles they might play.

No, no, you aren't worried about any history bull shit, you and your fellow Communists are only worried about one thing. And that thing is that Trump flooding the zone so to speak that the effect on crime reduction will be dramatic. And then when the guard and others leave, as they will, the Communist city leaders will let crime ramp back up and then the voters are going to go into open rebellion. And that what you crime loving sons a bitches fear the most.
 
Why do you think you have a say?
I never said I did. Do we not have a say? If so, why are you posting?

Lol...fuck off.
"lol"

You never do so why should I?

Crime doesn't end because of troops. It is paused until the troops leave. Liberties are also paused.
Which liberties? Which is better? More crime or more troops? Is crime paused because of the presence of police?

Are you afraid of crime or afraid of imagined personal freedoms being taken away by the presence of troops?
 
If Guard soldiers are mobilized to augment federal and state law enforcement I'm OK with that.
They are being sent to Chicago with guns.

Trump sending, for example, the 82nd airborne for any reason other than an insurrection, uncontrollable civil disturbance, protecting federal installations, or in the case of national security, that is flat out wrong.
So sending them to Chicago or NYC or San Francisco armed is something you object to?

Can you even say that or do you need to deflect again?
 
You're an idiot.

First of all Trump is time limited by law as to how long he can deploy the Nat'l guard and the roles they might play.
Lol...sure.....unless he declares emergencies ......which he has.
They have weapons now.

No, no, you aren't worried about any history bull shit, you and your fellow Communists are only worried about one thing. And that thing is that Trump flooding the zone so to speak that the effect on crime reduction will be dramatic. And then when the guard and others leave, as they will, the Communist city leaders will let crime ramp back up and then the voters are going to go into open rebellion. And that what you crime loving sons a bitches fear the most.
We own Intel, comrade.

I oppose troops on every street corner....that's it. That is not about crime...it's about our government heading into fascism more and more and recognizing it.

You think this is about crime.....yet red states with similar crime rates aren't being targeted.

Because it's not about crime.
 

Which liberties? Which is better? More crime or more troops? Is crime paused because of the presence of police?
Crime isn't rising.
It has been dropping.
Soldiers on every street corner is not a valid trade off.

Are you afraid of crime or afraid of imagined personal freedoms being taken away by the presence of troops?
Im not afraid of anything except a fascistic regime whittling away about perceived realities.

Do you think other dictatorships started off quickly?

Soldiers are not needed on the streets of America.
 
Crime isn't rising.
It has been dropping.
Soldiers on every street corner is not a valid trade off.


Im not afraid of anything except a fascistic regime whittling away about perceived realities.

Do you think other dictatorships started off quickly?

Soldiers are not needed on the streets of America.
fucking crazy person
 
They are being sent to Chicago with guns.


So sending them to Chicago or NYC or San Francisco armed is something you object to?

Can you even say that or do you need to deflect again?
I gave you the situations that I would agree to deploying active duty troops. Riots and civil disturbances handled by Guardsmen, preferably under the authority of the governor. Protecting federal installations and personnel, both branches could be appropriate..
 
I gave you the situations that I would agree to deploying active duty troops
Lol

. Riots and civil disturbances handled by Guardsmen, preferably under the authority of the governor. Protecting federal installations and personnel, both branches could be appropriate..
There are no riots or civil disturbances.

But

It's a National Emergency.

So says dear leader
 
Lol


There are no riots or civil disturbances.

But

It's a National Emergency.

So says dear leader
And guardsmen are not involved in law enforcement. The DC guard comes under the authority of the president.
 
Back
Top