Does anyone here really believe there are any racial differences?

[calmlikeabomb]

Well the slurs you use for a sub with a racial humiliation kink changes. So that's a clear difference. You can't call a Chink cunt a Kike Dyke. That's just a rookie mistake.

Apart from that, who gives a shit. We are all humans trying to get by in a cruel and uncaring world with just each other for love and support.

 

[JohnEngelman]

The Atlantic, 1993, “Dan Quayle Was Right”

The social-science evidence is in: though it may benefit the adults involved, the dissolution of intact two-parent families is harmful to large numbers of children. Moreover, the author argues, family diversity in the form of increasing numbers of single-parent and stepparent families does not strengthen the social fabric but, rather, dramatically weakens and undermines society...

A 1988 survey by the National Center for Health Statistics found that children in single-parent families are two to three times as likely as children in two-parent families to have emotional and behavioral problems. They are also more likely to drop out of high school, to get pregnant as teenagers, to abuse drugs, and to be in trouble with the law. Compared with children in intact families, children from disrupted families are at a much higher risk for physical or sexual abuse.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1993/04/dan-quayle-was-right/307015/

 

[JohnEngelman]

Well the slurs you use for a sub with a racial humiliation kink changes. So that's a clear difference. You can't call a Chink cunt a Kike Dyke. That's just a rookie mistake.

I don't use those words.

 

[calmlikeabomb]

I don't use those words.

You are a good man.

 

[Politruk]

I am familiar with a theory that Asians have a different "reproductive strategy" than other races -- that they are more intelligent and "less fecund." (Which seems to have something to do with smaller penises.) But if they are less fecund, why are there so many of them? In such large families (at least before the "one child" policy)?

That was J. Philippe Rushton.

J. Philippe Rushton (1943–2012) was a psychologist and pioneer of hereditarian racialist pseudoscience. He was an English-born Canadian who worked as a professor at the University of Western Ontario from 1977 (although only a full professor from 1985) until his death in 2012.[1] His specific specialty was "differential K theory", a misapplication of the grossly outdated and oversimplified R/K selection theory,https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Wikipedia%27s_W.svg/20px-Wikipedia%27s_W.svg.png postulated by E. O. Wilson, which argued that "Negroids" were more r-selected, while "Mongoloids" were more k-selected, with "Caucasoids" in between.[2] He frequently collaborated with Arthur Jensen, and the two of them often praised each other's work.[3][4][5]

Even fellow hereditarian, and editor-in-chief of Mankind Quarterly, Edward Dutton, to his chagrin, has come to the conclusion that "he [Rushton] was a liar, he was a fraud, and he was a thug", and all of his research work must be considered suspect.[6][7]

Rushton's research papers have been criticised for confirmation bias, overinterpreting minor trends in data and citing of "non-scientific sources of evidence, such as semi-pornographic literature (e.g., Penthouse or anonymous notes by "the French Army Surgeon" from 1898)".[note 1][9]:283