Do you own your body?

[BluesDriver66]

You must feel like shit after being bitchslapped by a Karen, loser.

Uh no. Neither do lame insults from clueless, simping, political hacks.

 

[ll74]

No. By law you have to register for the draft because the draft could be reinstated at a moments notice. You would have to be really stupid to think a moron like Trump would not do that because Putin does it or some other favorite dictator of his does it.

There is no chance it will be reinstated. You aren't forced.itno.it. move to the UK and then talk abkout it

 

[BluesDriver66]

There are no drafted soldiers.

This is 2022

You think the kind people that would overturn Roe vs Wade wouldn't start a war and reinstate the draft? It's adorable the way you are so trusting to lying, war mongering, dirt bag politicians.

 

[BluesDriver66]

There is no chance it will be reinstated. You aren't forced.itno.it. move to the UK and then talk abkout it

If there was no chance the Selective Service law would not exist.

 

[ll74]

You think the kind people that would overturn Roe vs Wade wouldn't start a war and reinstate the draft? It's adorable the way you are so trusting to lying, war mongering, dirt bag politicians.

Yes, I think they wouldn't do that.

 

[icanhelp1]

You think the kind people that would overturn Roe vs Wade wouldn't start a war and reinstate the draft? It's adorable the way you are so trusting to lying, war mongering, dirt bag politicians.

How would a supreme court justice go about starting a war? Just curious?

 

[techiedude71]

Uh no. Neither do lame insults from clueless, simping, political hacks.

Haha simping.. is it?

You’re an idiot.

Comparing a potential draft with making abortion illegal via overturning Roe v Wade is in no way remotely comparable but you keep posting. It seems to make you feel better even if you’re wrong. I still find calling anyone a simp over this amusing. Because this is all of us trying to get into Adrina’s virtual pants

 

[BluesDriver66]

How would a supreme court justice go about starting a war? Just curious?

What part of "kind of people" don't you understand? Justices don't start wars. Their good time buddies do that for them.

Scalia Won't Sit Out Case On Cheney​

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia fired back yesterday at critics of his recent duck-hunting trip with Vice President Cheney, issuing an unusual 21-page memo rejecting demands that he disqualify himself from a case involving Cheney.


Responding to a motion for his recusal filed by the Sierra Club, which is suing for access to records of a White House energy task force Cheney headed, Scalia said the justices have never been required to sit out cases involving friends in government who are being sued in their official capacities. To do so now, he wrote, would set a dangerous precedent.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...-cheney/16177033-f529-4e4f-8291-a53fb2b158e4/

 

[BluesDriver66]

Yes, I think they wouldn't do that.

It's the 21st century. A moron game show host couldn't possibly be elected President. A world wide pandemic couldn't lock down the entire planet. The U.S. Navy releasing videos of UFO's? A ground war Europe? Those are just silly notions that could never happen in today's world.

 

[BluesDriver66]

Haha simping.. is it?

You’re an idiot.

Comparing a potential draft with making abortion illegal via overturning Roe v Wade is in no way remotely comparable but you keep posting. It seems to make you feel better even if you’re wrong. I still find calling anyone a simp over this amusing. Because this is all of us trying to get into Adrina’s virtual pants

The government controlling your body through compulsory pregnancy or compulsory military service is the exact same thing.

 

[ll74]

.

The government controlling your body through compulsory pregnancy or compulsory military service is the exact same thing.

And one of those isn't happening currently

 

[adrina]

.

And one of those isn't happening currently

And when it did, they were paid for it. As opposed to paying for it.

 

[colddiesel]

The government controlling your body through compulsory pregnancy or compulsory military service is the exact same thing.

No it is not. The drafted soldier can refuse; that soldier will be punished but he/she knows the price and has a choice. A woman who has the government control her body has no choice and will pay for that absence of choice for the next 20+ years.

 

[icanhelp1]

What part of "kind of people" don't you understand? Justices don't start wars. Their good time buddies do that for them.

Scalia Won't Sit Out Case On Cheney​

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia fired back yesterday at critics of his recent duck-hunting trip with Vice President Cheney, issuing an unusual 21-page memo rejecting demands that he disqualify himself from a case involving Cheney.


Responding to a motion for his recusal filed by the Sierra Club, which is suing for access to records of a White House energy task force Cheney headed, Scalia said the justices have never been required to sit out cases involving friends in government who are being sued in their official capacities. To do so now, he wrote, would set a dangerous precedent.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arch...-cheney/16177033-f529-4e4f-8291-a53fb2b158e4/

And when it did, they were paid for it. As opposed to paying for it.

By now everyone understand that overturning Roe vs Wade does not ban abortion but sends that decision back to the states. It will revert to people's choice, the way it was prior to 1973.

Interesting statistic is 9 out of 10 women chose to have their abortion within the first trimester. I believe that falls within the acceptable range of most states. Trigger bans 8 weeks or less ( 6 ) for those states I believe falls within the range of what the citizenry finds acceptable.

The combination of these two statistics I believe falls within the acceptable range of 90% of women.

Those few states with a complete ban where R v W was a federal decision governing abortion I believe will no longer be able to hide behind the high courts protection and will have a fight on their hands to continue a zero tolerance to abortion, I believe those states with zero tolerance will be forced to ballot amend their stance, probably somewhere between 8 weeks, first heartbeat, or towards the end of the first trimester.

I think there's a lot of premature hand wringing for nothing. Right now this is a hypocritical political war by politicians who really don't give a fuck other than self promotion, self preservation and party loyalty.

 

[Dribble]

I wonder which right wing voice triggered these thoughts...cause they are too ignorant for even most here

 

[adrina]

By now everyone understand that overturning Roe vs Wade does not ban abortion but sends that decision back to the states. It will revert to people's choice, the way it was prior to 1973.

Interesting statistic is 9 out of 10 women chose to have their abortion within the first trimester. I believe that falls within the acceptable range of most states. Trigger bans 8 weeks or less ( 6 ) for those states I believe falls within the range of what the citizenry finds acceptable.

The combination of these two statistics I believe falls within the acceptable range of 90% of women.

Those few states with a complete ban where R v W was a federal decision governing abortion I believe will no longer be able to hide behind the high courts protection and will have a fight on their hands to continue a zero tolerance to abortion, I believe those states with zero tolerance will be forced to ballot amend their stance, probably somewhere between 8 weeks, first heartbeat, or towards the end of the first trimester.

I think there's a lot of premature hand wringing for nothing. Right now this is a hypocritical political war by politicians who really don't give a fuck other than self promotion, self preservation and party loyalty.

Fuck off.

Our country is about to give more rights to a corpse than women.

 

[icanhelp1]

Fuck off.

Our country is about to give more rights to a corpse than women.

I tried to be civil, but like usual

 

[ll74]

I tried to be civil, but like usual

Your body isn't threatened.

Civil is relative

 

[AlexBailey]

By now everyone understand that overturning Roe vs Wade does not ban abortion but sends that decision back to the states. It will revert to people's choice, the way it was prior to 1973.

That's how the Confederate States wanted to deal with slavery and tried to justify not having a national mandate. It made it so some people could be owned and controlled by other people anywhere enough of a majority was willing to enslave a minority.

You're using the same old argument to trying to control other people you disagree with who are doing something that has no threat to you.

 

[schism666]

how many letters and phone calls have you made in support of mothers who can't find formula?

 

[adrina]

I tried to be civil, but like usual

Fuck off.

There's no civility to be had with people like yourself who support politicians who enact policies that reduce half the populations' basic rights.

 

[LittleDixie]

So, genius, how do you have two sets of rights reside in one body?

This is not a well formulated question.

How do you have two sets of rights in one body?

Pregnancy.

 

[windar]

I believe those states with zero tolerance will be forced to ballot amend their stance, probably somewhere between 8 weeks, first heartbeat, or towards the end of the first trimester.

I will be happy to wager a large sum of money that they will not do that. The Republican party is almost 100% against abortion and those states vote solidly Republican for a whole variety of reasons and will not change that over abortion . Most of those states don't have ballot initiatives or have very limited ones, so that isn't an option.

Care to take my bet??

 

[adrina]

This is not a well formulated question.

How do you have two sets of rights in one body?

Pregnancy.

That's not a well formulated answer. Pregnancy is obviously the condition we are discussing.

The anti-abortion fanatics give the rights to the fetus while removing the rights from the woman.

You can't have two conflicting sets of rights in one body then give the authority to the fetus. That's insanity.

 

[adrina]

I will be happy to wager a large sum of money that they will not do that. The Republican party is almost 100% against abortion and those states vote solidly Republican for a whole variety of reasons and will not change that over abortion . Most of those states don't have ballot initiatives or have very limited ones, so that isn't an option.

Care to take my bet??

The next goal is a national ban. The anti-abortion leaders have already said so. The anti abortion movement is dishonest and their only goal is to foist their hysterical fanaticism on everyone in America.