CyranoJ
Ustuzou
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2015
- Posts
- 2,759
Revising stories in process is routine, whether or not I have external feedback. Many, many stories never make it to the point of posting on account of this. There are times when I simply can't make the rhythm of things work to my satisfaction. It's substantially likelier for a story to be published when I have another editor, though, because then I'm not just banging around in my own brain and I have some kind of context for things.I’m referring both to stories revised after publication and those revised beforehand (based on external feedback), but please answer about them separately.
The other side of that equation is that once a thing has been published, there's always a cohesive and intent creative vision behind it. I take note of feedback but no, I never edit stories because of it. I once considered generating an alternative vision of a story in response to feedback, but ultimately this requires ripping out substantial parts of a story to the point of just writing something entirely different, and I will normally decline to do that.