KillerMuffin
Seraphically Disinclined
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2000
- Posts
- 25,603
That's how it started out. Mostly in sidewalk chalk all over the campus. It's like dozens of people would sneak onto campus at 5 in the morning and write "Do you agree with Joe?" all over the place. That's it, nothing more. A few days later the first green posters with white letters showed up on the trees and walls. "Do you agree with Joe?" Everyone wondered who Joe was, but whoever was playing sidewalk chalk tag in the early morning wasn't saying. The posters promised that Joe would speak, in the auditorium on the last day of April, at 7pm and everyone would find out if they did, indeed, agree with Joe. The college was abuzz with what Joe's mysterious position on whatever it Joe thought important enough to find out if anyone agreed with him far in advance. It was very exciting.
A week later, Monday the 22nd, college administration forced the "Do you agree with Joe?" perpetrators to add the words "sponsered by the Campus Crusade for Christ" to anything advertising "Joe."
The campus is now up in arms. Nevermind that the state wants to increase tutition rates by about 25%, Joe is far more important.
Everyone is incensed about something. Most of them don't really know what they are upset about.
Secular parts of the Society for Free-Thinkers began a sidewalk chalk campaign downing religion. People wrote into the college paper. Everyone is howling.
There are basically two camps.
There are those who agree with, well not necessarily Joe, but that Joe didn't do anything wrong. They cite the First Amendment, shrug their shoulders and either ignore the howling or wear a green "I agree with Joe" t-shirt. The don't understand why people are upset about this.
Then there are those who think that Joe... Well, they don't know what to think about Joe, but they all agree that what Joe's buddies, the Campus Crusade for Christ, did was wrong.
Interestingly, the lines aren't drawn by religion. 5 Pastors of local churches of different denominations wrote a letter to the college paper deploring what Joe and the CCC did. A locally reknowned communist stood on one of the benches near the library and spoke about Joe's right to ask people if they agreed with him or not.
What do you think? Was Joe right or wrong? Why?
A week later, Monday the 22nd, college administration forced the "Do you agree with Joe?" perpetrators to add the words "sponsered by the Campus Crusade for Christ" to anything advertising "Joe."
The campus is now up in arms. Nevermind that the state wants to increase tutition rates by about 25%, Joe is far more important.
Everyone is incensed about something. Most of them don't really know what they are upset about.
Secular parts of the Society for Free-Thinkers began a sidewalk chalk campaign downing religion. People wrote into the college paper. Everyone is howling.
There are basically two camps.
There are those who agree with, well not necessarily Joe, but that Joe didn't do anything wrong. They cite the First Amendment, shrug their shoulders and either ignore the howling or wear a green "I agree with Joe" t-shirt. The don't understand why people are upset about this.
Then there are those who think that Joe... Well, they don't know what to think about Joe, but they all agree that what Joe's buddies, the Campus Crusade for Christ, did was wrong.
Interestingly, the lines aren't drawn by religion. 5 Pastors of local churches of different denominations wrote a letter to the college paper deploring what Joe and the CCC did. A locally reknowned communist stood on one of the benches near the library and spoke about Joe's right to ask people if they agreed with him or not.
What do you think? Was Joe right or wrong? Why?