Do I have this right?

Conager

¿Que? Cornelius!
Joined
Dec 2, 2014
Posts
18,282
Let me see if I have this right:

The Democrats that have spent over three years decrying the Electoral College up to and including calling for it to be abolished nationwide in favor of the popular vote have decided that Buttigieg gets the majority of delegates despite Sanders winning the sacred popular vote? Again?

That doesn't seem very democratic of the Democrats.
 
27% of Republicans believe that Trump committed crimes, and they are OK with it.

That's all anyone needs to know.
 
Let me see if I have this right:

The Democrats that have spent over three years decrying the Electoral College up to and including calling for it to be abolished nationwide in favor of the popular vote have decided that Buttigieg gets the majority of delegates despite Sanders winning the sacred popular vote? Again?

That doesn't seem very democratic of the Democrats.

They can't even cheat with any sort of consistency or competency.

ORANGE MAN BAD GOD DAMN IT!!! ORANGE MAN BAD!!!!!
https://media3.giphy.com/media/13AXYJh2jDt2IE/giphy.gif


That's all anyone needs to know.

No, that's all you want anyone to know.

The reason they are ok with it is because the only other option they have is are socialist loons, most of which want open borders and free EVERYTHING for anyone who shows up with their hands out.
 
Playing by the rules, and desiring to change the rules are not inconsistent positions. Especially when those positions are not monolithically held by every Democrat in the party. Plenty of Democrats want the Iowa caucus system abolished. :rolleyes:
 
It looks like the Democrat dingbats are going to count the votes again and again until they get the results they want 😂
 
Maybe the President can win the popular vote as well as the electoral college, like all Democratic Presidents have.
 

When your level of fail is beyond the ability of the grandmaster of spin, you might want to reevaluate.

I'm Ok with them continuing to flounder.

Maybe instead of getting their shit together they can occupy themselves by slapping together another meaningless partisan impeachment? They might even be able to show that its popular in all the big, blue locales.
 
Playing by the rules, and desiring to change the rules are not inconsistent positions. Especially when those positions are not monolithically held by every Democrat in the party. Plenty of Democrats want the Iowa caucus system abolished. :rolleyes:

A) Democrats only "play by the rules" when someone is watching. They don't believe in objective morality.

B) "The rules" for the Iowa Democrat Party Primary are entirely within the purview of the Democrats in Iowa

C) What "plenty of Democrats" in States not named Iowa want is immaterial.

D) "Plenty of Democrats" in Iowa consume all the same pablum you do regarding Hilary 's meaningless popular vote "victory." I doubt you could get many Democrats in Iowa to acknowledge they very simple truth that the majority of Americans who voted did not vote for Hillary, much less the fact that most of the voters that mattered last election and will matter in the next, voted Trump.
 
A) Democrats only "play by the rules" when someone is watching. They don't believe in objective morality.

B) "The rules" for the Iowa Democrat Party Primary are entirely within the purview of the Democrats in Iowa

C) What "plenty of Democrats" in States not named Iowa want is immaterial.

D) "Plenty of Democrats" in Iowa consume all the same pablum you do regarding Hilary 's meaningless popular vote "victory." I doubt you could get many Democrats in Iowa to acknowledge they very simple truth that the majority of Americans who voted did not vote for Hillary, much less the fact that most of the voters that mattered last election and will matter in the next, voted Trump.



They don't get the fact that if you can win a district with 50,000 votes and you get 250,000 votes, well, you had me at 50,000! the rest is fluff. That door swings both ways.
 
When your level of fail is beyond the ability of the grandmaster of spin, you might want to reevaluate.

I'm Ok with them continuing to flounder.

Maybe instead of getting their shit together they can occupy themselves by slapping together another meaningless partisan impeachment? They might even be able to show that its popular in all the big, blue locales.

Agreed. They're handing us 4 more years of Trump. Which beats the hell out of anything they can offer.
 
Maybe the President can win the popular vote as well as the electoral college, like all Democratic Presidents have.

Why?? I hope he loses the irrelevant vote by 10+ million.

The more he loses the popular vote, the larger the meltdown yield gets and the more (D)'s out themselves as having no fucking clue what kind of country they live in or how it operates.

Import some Cubans, then?

Nah...they know first hand how bad "progress" gets. They are a major problem for (D)'s in Florida, so naturally Cubans have been reclassified as "White people" for being a bunch of Nazis.

If the dumb asses only knew all they needed was to win the college, all that work for nothing. :D:nana:

They don't like to go outside their bubble and convince/sell the moderates/liberals/conservatives on their ideals/ideology.

So they just keep catering to most radical leftist NIMBY turds they can find in NYC, SF, LA and Twitter.

They would rather lose the game and play victim than go to WI, PA, FL, Texas even.....and tell all those why they would be better off if the government took a lot more if not all (those who earn their living in the 'incorrect' industries) of their shit from them and gave it to illegal migrants.

Then tell 45-90% of the population that they need to be ashamed and guilty for being born with white skin and 1/2 the population they're horrible people for being born with a dick between their legs. That they just need to accept these facts and that THEY are the racist and sexist if they don't.

LOL.....I'm shocked they aren't more gung-ho about it. :D
 
27% of Republicans believe that Trump committed crimes, and they are OK with it.

That's all anyone needs to know.

But that is not what the original poster/ creator asked. Its someone trying to understand the stance of Democrats. As a non American, i would have like to understand it too.
Your comment seems to be there to deflect. It causes me to wonder why you would deflect when an understanding of what the Democrats advocate is what was asked. Is no criticism of Democrats permissible? No party anywhere is perfect but your deflection to the question makes me wonder why
 
:rose:
But that is not what the original poster/ creator asked. Its someone trying to understand the stance of Democrats. As a non American, i would have like to understand it too.
Your comment seems to be there to deflect. It causes me to wonder why you would deflect when an understanding of what the Democrats advocate is what was asked. Is no criticism of Democrats permissible? No party anywhere is perfect but your deflection to the question makes me wonder why
The OP doesn’t deserve a better response. Iowans determine the delegates, and Iowans have zero interest in altering the Electoral College.
 
Maybe the President can win the popular vote as well as the electoral college, like all Democratic Presidents have.

Or they could nominate a reasonable, centrist candidate instead of a bunch of extremist buffoons and maybe beat the guy so many despise...….or not
 
Back
Top