gauchecritic
When there are grey skies
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2002
- Posts
- 7,076
A similar question has been asked quite recently, about how much leeway we give Lit. authors we know, in their writing.
I've just been reading a story by a very well respected author on these boards.
When I normally read a story here, it is for the entertainment I can derive from it. If I'm directed or urged to a story because someone thinks it is above average or even the greatest thing they've ever read, I often come away feeling disappointed.
Thinking about it, I decided it was because:
a) I didn't read it for entertainment but rather more critically
b) my expectations were too high
c) It's Literotica and I wasn't literocized
and
d) It wasn't a category I would have read anyway.
I can appreciate the literary finesse, I can see the absence of spelling mistakes, I can laud the craftsmanship, but it wasn't what I wanted. It wasn't written how I'd write it, or wish I could write.
On the other hand the two best stories I have ever read on Lit. (best because I still remember them) were: one that was very poorly written, bad grammar, worse spelling and having the appearance of being written by someone who just wrote down what they wanted to get across, as best they could, plus it was in my favourite category.
The second I read was in response to an inquiry as to why they had a poor vote result. When I read it, I saw exactly why it had a poor result. It was so emotionally powerful I couldn't stop telling everyone about it for weeks. Not my category, not my cup of tea, I skimmed it the first time, then re-read it three times in a row.
So now, I've negated every reason I had for thinking this latest story was not all it was cracked up to be.
What I want to know is: What's going on?
Gauche
I've just been reading a story by a very well respected author on these boards.
When I normally read a story here, it is for the entertainment I can derive from it. If I'm directed or urged to a story because someone thinks it is above average or even the greatest thing they've ever read, I often come away feeling disappointed.
Thinking about it, I decided it was because:
a) I didn't read it for entertainment but rather more critically
b) my expectations were too high
c) It's Literotica and I wasn't literocized
and
d) It wasn't a category I would have read anyway.
I can appreciate the literary finesse, I can see the absence of spelling mistakes, I can laud the craftsmanship, but it wasn't what I wanted. It wasn't written how I'd write it, or wish I could write.
On the other hand the two best stories I have ever read on Lit. (best because I still remember them) were: one that was very poorly written, bad grammar, worse spelling and having the appearance of being written by someone who just wrote down what they wanted to get across, as best they could, plus it was in my favourite category.
The second I read was in response to an inquiry as to why they had a poor vote result. When I read it, I saw exactly why it had a poor result. It was so emotionally powerful I couldn't stop telling everyone about it for weeks. Not my category, not my cup of tea, I skimmed it the first time, then re-read it three times in a row.
So now, I've negated every reason I had for thinking this latest story was not all it was cracked up to be.
What I want to know is: What's going on?
Gauche