Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some people just do it to mess with you.Is this why all my favorite LW stories get 1-bombed to oblivion?![]()
If it's actually his kids, yeah, only a scumbag would complain about supporting them up until they're at least 18. Most folks, if they can, would be happy to support them til 23, 26, whatever; my kids will get whatever support they need from me for the rest of my life.Any man who complains about supporting his kids as they work through school to create a better life for themselves is lower than trash. What, because their mother doesn't put out anymore, you have no obligation to your kids?
Yeah, and millions haven't. I'm lucky; my divorce was amicable, and we had no kids. I am grateful every day for that. I've been married to the mother of my children for almost 20 years now, and I can't imagine us ever getting divorced. but I checked the laws, rules, etc. here in Texas, and... yeah. If anything ever did happen, even though I'm the one that gets them up, takes them to school and picks them up, watches them during the summer, takes them to appointments, put them to bed at night, etc., the chance of me getting custody is insanely low.Or is this going to go into a Gordo rant about how awful it is to be a divorced father wahhh. Somehow, millions of us have done just fine.
Nah. If you actually read LW stories, one of the go-to bits of shorthand for "this is a bad guy" is that he's a deadbeat dad. It's pretty much a trope now that if our hero meets a new romantic interest after his divorce, if she has a kid, the father is going to be a deadbeat that ran out on them. LW folks REALLY don't like deadbeat dads.Meanwhile her ex would a hero to the crowd we're talking about, including the OP with his "The poor bastard" comment.
Usually child support only extends based on the kid being a full time student. If the kid is 20 and working full time, there's not many places you'd still be paying.In SOME cases, child support for that long is a good thing and needed.
In SOME cases, it's total fucking bullshit.
Everything is a case-by-case basis. Can't generalize it.
My father was a deadbeat dad, and was 7 years behind child support for my younger sister.
I was "emancipated" at 16, and got away from my crazier than a nutter butter parents![]()
![]()
![]()
I going to say this once. Stop explaining away this category to me. Stop defending it, stop advocating for it, stop yammering about what you think it says about society, to me.If it's actually his kids, yeah, only a scumbag would complain about supporting them up until they're at least 18. Most folks, if they can, would be happy to support them til 23, 26, whatever; my kids will get whatever support they need from me for the rest of my life.
But given that this is Literotica, and "she tricked me into raising another man's kids" is a common trope in LW stories, this is actually a useful piece of trivia, along with knowing that DNA testing won't get the husband off the hook unless they can compel the sperm donor to get tested. Also, things like knowing that only ~10 states have actual shared custody (the rest have custody and visitation, and getting visitation enforced consistently is just about impossible). Or that in the vast majority of cases, even if a father asks for custody, the mother will get it, short of circumstances like mom being in jail or a recovering drug addict.
Yeah, and millions haven't. I'm lucky; my divorce was amicable, and we had no kids. I am grateful every day for that. I've been married to the mother of my children for almost 20 years now, and I can't imagine us ever getting divorced. but I checked the laws, rules, etc. here in Texas, and... yeah. If anything ever did happen, even though I'm the one that gets them up, takes them to school and picks them up, watches them during the summer, takes them to appointments, put them to bed at night, etc., the chance of me getting custody is insanely low.
Divorce and custody law is one of the few places in American law where being a guy does suck comparatively: if you get divorced, you aren't going to get the kids, and the judges are likely to give the mother a lot of latitude with things like leaving the state for a better job. Like 99 times out of 100, I'd choose to be a guy in America; but when it comes to trying to decide alimony, child support, etc.? Nope.
It's another problem caused by the patriarchy, but it's hard to tell guys that; "you getting your kids taken away by your cheating wife" may be due to enforcement of traditional societal roles through law, but if you're a dad that wants to spend time with their kids? That's an especially bitter pill to swallow.
Nah. If you actually read LW stories, one of the go-to bits of shorthand for "this is a bad guy" is that he's a deadbeat dad. It's pretty much a trope now that if our hero meets a new romantic interest after his divorce, if she has a kid, the father is going to be a deadbeat that ran out on them. LW folks REALLY don't like deadbeat dads.
Typically, it's until the child reaches adulthood.Usually child support only extends based on the kid being a full time student. If the kid is 20 and working full time, there's not many places you'd still be paying.
But here's the thing, child support is seen as an awful thing by man babies and "victims", and these same victims are living with a another woman in a month while his ex raises the kids...so, want your precious money? Or want freedom? I'm not really looking for an answer, because its a point not a real question.
But what else gets overlooked is, and again this is all about the whining and "society favors women" crowd. It never occurs to them that supporting your child is the right thing to do. Its what responsible fathers-and in some cases mothers do-and in turn that child sees you doing right by them, they respect you for it, and it teaches them the right thing.
But to see it that way you'd have to care enough about the kid, and for that matter yourself, and the average dead beat cry baby isn't capable of that.
My wife's friend has a son she's disowned. He's in his thirties, claims "disability" and hasn't worked in years. He's fathered three kids and doesn't pay a dime, and trying to keep staying with her. Her answer of if your dick works you can work too, should be made into a bumper sticker.
I'm tired of weak men who cry victim, who in turn run around places like this acting like they're "real men"
See Tilan for a great example.
Oh, crap, look at this. A fact.In America adult children can file their taxes as dependants for any year they've been in school, until age 26. If the kid isn't going to college and therefore isn't on the tax forms as a dependent, child support isn't an obligation.
Nah. If you keep saying blatantly untrue shit, I'll keep correcting you. Not because I care about your opnion, but because I'm sick as hell of someone with absolutely no real experience in the category trying to define what it is and is not.I going to say this once. Stop explaining away this category to me. Stop defending it, stop advocating for it, stop yammering about what you think it says about society, to me.
I'm not annoyed at all. I'm not the one using all caps and ignoring the context because the acronym "LW" is like a red flag for me. The context, since you missed it, was "if the 'father' isn't actually the father, especially if the mother knows who the actual father is." It's relevant in that case.Especially when you are going to go full man baby on me with the "what if she cheated?"
THEY'RE YOUR KIDS. THEY DID NOT CHEAT ON YOU, THEY DID NOTHING WRONG. IS THIS SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN UNDERSTAND?
And I never said that a woman being a cheater makes her a bad parent; hell if you go read my stories, you'll see that. There are several where the mom is a great parent, regardless of her other failings. Even my sequel to the Ur-cheating wife story (February Sucks) has the all-time most hated character in the category as a good parent and co-parent.Okay, maybe you at least read that line. But if you're not sufficiently annoyed? Just because a woman cheats doesn't mean she's not capable of being a good mother. Hey, maybe she cheated because the father is a POS. Possible, except not in your world.
Like I said, I'm not correcting you for your benefit. You're a lost cause, so certain that you know everything about LW and the people that write and read there that you can't possibly be wrong. I'm not trying to educate you; I'm trying to counteract your bullshit.So, in the future keep your mansplaining for people like Simon, Tilan, Gordo.
Nah. If you keep saying blatantly untrue shit, I'll keep correcting you. Not because I care about your opnion, but because I'm sick as hell of someone with absolutely no real experience int eh category trying to define what it is and is not.
I'm not annoyed at all. I'm not the one using all caps and ignoring the context because the acronym "LW" is like a red flag for me. The context, since you missed it, was "if the 'father' isn't actually the father, especially if the mother knows who the actual father is." It's relevant in that case.
And I never said that a woman being a cheater makes her a bad parent; hell if you go read my stories, you'll see that. There are several where the mom is a great parent, regardless of her other failings. Even my sequel on the Ur-cheating wife story (February Sucks) has the all-time most hated character in the category as a good parent and co-parent.
Like I said, I'm not correcting you for your benefit. You're a lost cause, so certain that you know everything about LW and the people that write and read there that you can't possibly be wrong. I'm not trying to educate you; I'm trying to counteract your bullshit.
But go ahead, keep strawmanning. It's fun!
I forgot to respond to this before, but I have a story literally named “Why She Cheated” and the short answer was that he was a POS. You’re just batting a thousand here today, ain’tcha?Hey, maybe she cheated because the father is a POS. Possible, except not in your world.
It's whose name is on the birth certificate that matters on child support. Who actually fathered the child isn't the issue. Most of the time, even with a DNA test, the courts still considered the father of record the father. At least, as I understand it. I had no children in my first marriage, I didn't cheat, he did.I'm not annoyed at all. I'm not the one using all caps and ignoring the context because the acronym "LW" is like a red flag for me. The context, since you missed it, was "if the 'father' isn't actually the father, especially if the mother knows who the actual father is." It's relevant in that case.
Yeah. This is one of those sticking points for a number of guys. I understand it (kids need to be taken care of) but I also understand the frustration of guys stuck in that situation. Like I said earlier, “they aren’t really my kids” is a trope in a number of LW stories; on the other hand, it’s usually “okay, I’m not their speem donor, but I raised them, so I consider myself their father; but I still want payback for the scam that got run on me.” It’s one of those complex things that makes writing in LW so enjoyable for me.It's whose name is on the birth certificate that matters on child support. Who actually fathered the child isn't the issue. Most of the time, even with a DNA test, the courts still considered the father of record the father. At least, as I understand it. I had no children in my first marriage, I didn't cheat, he did.
Allow me to play AH Yoda and flex my "Things that make you go Hmmm"