Desantis voted against federal support after Hurricane Sandy in 2013. Duplicity personified. This guy is trouble.

Intrigued42

Literotica Guru
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Posts
640
Why pay for the morons decisions: they build in flood plains, they build where annual forest fires destroy millions of acres. Perhaps because we're human and we forgive the f**king ignorant for their stupidity? Perhaps.
 
And then he flew all those immigrants out to safety and left Floridians to fend for themselves.

Political stunts over lives.
 
DeSantis apparently did vote against the Hurricane Sandy relief bill that included money for Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Will Florida voters will hold it against him in November? I doubt it. Re-election prospects are looking good.
 
Sandy was a much weaker storm spread out over a large area. It's an apples to oranges comparison, because no state was as devastated as Florida has been, they were inconvenienced and had some rebuilding to do, but it was not above their means to deal with.

Different times, jobs and circumstances require different reactions; this should be clear to all.
 
Sandy was a much weaker storm spread out over a large area. It's an apples to oranges comparison, because no state was as devastated as Florida has been, they were inconvenienced and had some rebuilding to do, but it was not above their means to deal with.

Different times, jobs and circumstances require different reactions; this should be clear to all.
None of that was any excuse for then-Rep. DeSantis to vote no. Homes were destroyed, people were hurting, and helping one another in their hour of need is what Americans are supposed to do. Not to mention that many of the areas that were devastated in Florida are in spots that have been known for a hundred years and more to be in harm's way in hurricane season, yet people keep building houses there.
 
Well, I think that with issues like this, people don't look past the title of bills and unless you do some deep research to prove otherwise, I'm guessing the bill was loaded with pork that had nothing to do with hurricane damage or recovery. That's just how Congress works and he may have very well cast his vote in principled protest knowing that it was going to pass without his vote. Many bills feature such symbolic votes with the Party's blessing because a candidate has potential to rise with such a vote (or is in danger of losing the next election), and in this case, despite that vote which the focus has been turned on here, he did rise and looks to be ascending.

Furthermore, Idaho bet that if his vote was crucial to passage, it would have been different.
 
Well, I think that with issues like this, people don't look past the title of bills and unless you do some deep research to prove otherwise, I'm guessing the bill was loaded with pork that had nothing to do with hurricane damage or recovery. That's just how Congress works and he may have very well cast his vote in principled protest knowing that it was going to pass without his vote. Many bills feature such symbolic votes with the Party's blessing because a candidate has potential to rise with such a vote (or is in danger of losing the next election), and in this case, despite that vote which the focus has been turned on here, he did rise and looks to be ascending.

Furthermore, Idaho bet that if his vote was crucial to passage, it would have been different.
Precisely!!!!! Load the bills up with poison pills. Both sides of the aisle do it.
 
Well, I think that with issues like this, people don't look past the title of bills and unless you do some deep research to prove otherwise, I'm guessing the bill was loaded with pork that had nothing to do with hurricane damage or recovery. That's just how Congress works and he may have very well cast his vote in principled protest knowing that it was going to pass without his vote. Many bills feature such symbolic votes with the Party's blessing because a candidate has potential to rise with such a vote (or is in danger of losing the next election), and in this case, despite that vote which the focus has been turned on here, he did rise and looks to be ascending.

Furthermore, Idaho bet that if his vote was crucial to passage, it would have been different.
It was loaded with pork that had nothing to do with New Jersey. Even had pork that would have gone to Florida.
 
One reason they can do this is that they know Democrats won't reciprocate when the tables are turned, so it's a risk-free pose for them.
 
If only Biden would rock up and chuck some paper towels at Key Largo. That would be great.
 
One reason they can do this is that they know Democrats won't reciprocate when the tables are turned, so it's a risk-free pose for them.
And why we will lose the battle in the long run. Wars can't be won playing nice. And you can't fix a broken system using that broken system. Democrats are responsive....not proactive.
 
Back
Top