HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,077
Deporting US citizens?
- Thread starter dolf
- Start date
Again, I'm in favour of enforcing the laws, I'm just not going to assume every gun and drug was from those illegals. I'll wait till the facts come out. That's the difference HisArpy....and if you were really a Lawyer, you'd admit I'm right.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,077
No, you're going to assume that ALL the guns and drugs weren't from them. Instead, you assume that ALL of the drugs and guns belong to the ones who weren't arrested.
Because brown skin or something...
Ascription,
Ascription,
and Arpy's Racism in for the win!!!!!
dolf
Ex porn
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Posts
- 78,962
I'd like to draw your attention to the title of the thread.https://coloradosun.com/2025/04/28/colorado-springs-immigration-raid-detain/
More illegals doing drugs and possessing guns, along with breaking the law by breaking into my country
Yupper "they just be wanting a better life".....(go fucking figure).... oh, and for you anti-gun nazis you should be grateful that the po-po removed the guns from the illegals, it's breaking the law for an illegal to possess a firearm and or the ammo
P.s. the jail time for violating this law is up to 10 years......
Deporting US citizens?
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 67,972
As a lawyer, should you assume the guns and drugs were from "them" or no?
How does that work in court? I've heard some things.....
Fuzzy isn't doing that
Lol
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,077
dolf
Ex porn
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Posts
- 78,962
Absolutely not! I would never derail a thread!Umm, is this you?
"Buffy" and Derpy are such ignorant racist fucks.
Their FAILURE to mention or pay ANY attention to the ARMED U.S. service members who were detained in the raid is deplorable, but hardly surprising.
And by ICE’s own admission: “when the cops hit the door the drugs hit the floor”, so assigning possession of the drugs to the "illegals" in the club is a bit of a leap at best.
We. Told. Them. So.
Their FAILURE to mention or pay ANY attention to the ARMED U.S. service members who were detained in the raid is deplorable, but hardly surprising.
And by ICE’s own admission: “when the cops hit the door the drugs hit the floor”, so assigning possession of the drugs to the "illegals" in the club is a bit of a leap at best.
We. Told. Them. So.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,077
I've noticed a decrease in his histrionic output since he got smacked down over his "electrical knowledge" and the loss of his buddy wat....
Derpy is such a creepy, desperate, pathetic, desperate, creepy derp…
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,077
Please do, without Wat,Icant,Hump, Hitch and slew of others It's getting boring here....
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,077
You first...*chuckles*
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,077
Not doing an encore performance?
I did, but a bunch of the others just wondered if you offed yourself.
You wish......lol
No, you didn't, you're still alive.
By doing what?
Lemme guess; creating another new screen name.
Because Lord knows, you never seem to have enough of them.
dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 5,422
Please! Show me where you notice progress in that guy.
dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 5,422
dmallord
Humble Hobbit
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Posts
- 5,422
@HisArpy
You say you’re a lawyer? Fascinating—because assigning criminal guilt by headcount sounds more like barstool logic than anything you'd hear in a courtroom. “57% of the people were undocumented, so 57% of the guns and drugs must be theirs.” Brilliant. Maybe next you’ll argue 10% of the floor was sticky, so 10% of the crime happened there.
The article doesn't tie a single weapon or drug to any individual, but you leap to blame the undocumented anyway. That’s not reasoning—it’s bias doing a victory lap.
And as for “you suck at creating narratives”? Buddy, you’re the one writing fan fiction here. The only thing transparent is your agenda. Try building your argument on evidence instead of stereotypes. It'll feel weird at first—but it gets easier with practice.
You say you’re a lawyer? Fascinating—because assigning criminal guilt by headcount sounds more like barstool logic than anything you'd hear in a courtroom. “57% of the people were undocumented, so 57% of the guns and drugs must be theirs.” Brilliant. Maybe next you’ll argue 10% of the floor was sticky, so 10% of the crime happened there.
The article doesn't tie a single weapon or drug to any individual, but you leap to blame the undocumented anyway. That’s not reasoning—it’s bias doing a victory lap.
And as for “you suck at creating narratives”? Buddy, you’re the one writing fan fiction here. The only thing transparent is your agenda. Try building your argument on evidence instead of stereotypes. It'll feel weird at first—but it gets easier with practice.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,077
Lemme guess; you didn't get any Cheerios this am, did you?
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,077
1. As a lawyer my job is to gather the facts and develop an assessment of what actually happened. I will view that assessment in light of what's most beneficial to my client, but I cannot and will not omit or change facts from what they are into something they aren't. Because being completely stupid isn't in my playbook.
2. FACT: The government arrested approximately 50% of the attendees. Fact: They also seized drugs and guns from the attendees. FACT: The government doesn't let people who are at a crime scene and in unlawful possession of guns or drugs go free. I'm sure you can add up those facts and come to the same conclusion I did. If you can't that's 100% on you.
3. As a lawyer, were one of the people arrested my client I'd advise them to proceed based on the FACTS. If that means pleading guilty to a lesser offense is the best course of action, that's what I'd advise them to do. What I wouldn't do is tell them to create a narrative based on social media bullshit which isn't borne out by the FACTS. Why? Because that will only piss off the judge and increase the potential sentence after they're found guilty.
4. When it comes to ICE arresting illegal aliens, and there is evidence of a crime as well as the illegal immigration status offense, it's often a smarter play (something you're probably not capable of understanding because smart isn't in your wheelhouse) to accept the deportation without criminal charges rather than go to trial on the criminal offenses, be found guilty, and go to prison first before being deported upon your release after serving your full FEDERAL prison time without any parole. This means the arrested illegal immigrant gets to choose between going home in a week or staying for 5-10 years in prison before going home afterward.
The real problem here is that you think you're so smart and clued up you miss what's really happening. In fact, you never saw any of that coming, did you? Which is why I'm the lawyer and you're the asshole who thinks he's clever for posting shit you know nothing about on a porn board.
