U
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
. . . an assault weapon or large capacity magazine . . .
Well, of course they do and should want to take those. There's no news here.
What's an "assault weapon"?Well, of course they do and should want to take those. There's no news here.
Well, of course they do and should want to take those. There's no news here.
Isn't the what Obama told us?
Missouri Democrats Introduce Legislation to Confiscate Firearms – Gives Gun Owners 90 Days to Turn in Weapons
Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, February 14, 2013, 9:52 AM
Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which would turn law-abiding firearm owners into criminals. They will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed.
Dana Loesch Radio reported on the new legislation being pushed by Missouri Democrats:
Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution.
Here’s part of the Democratic proposal in Missouri:
4. Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution:
(1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri;
(2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or
(3) Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.
5. Unlawful manufacture, import, possession, purchase, sale, or transfer of an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine is a class C felony.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...arms-gives-gunowners-90-days-to-turn-in-guns/
Let's see if I can do my best vette and BB impression. First I have to point to some pointless news item. Then I have to copy and paste the entire thing. Then I have to make some absurd claim.
Republicans support terrorist buying guns!!!!!!!!!!!!!
N.J. Republicans who want to allow suspected terrorists to buy guns are nuts: Editorial
By Star-Ledger Editorial Board
on February 14, 2013 at 11:55 AM, updated February 14, 2013 at 1:21 PM
Remember when Republicans supported the war on terror?
Well today, some of them oppose basic, common-sense measures to make Americans safe.
Yesterday, several New Jersey Republicans in the Assembly refused to support a bill in committee that would ban people on the terrorist watch list from buying guns. Yes, really: Members of the party of self-proclaimed patriots are now protecting the right of suspected terrorists to obtain weapons.
They are: Assemblyman Sean Kean (Monmouth) and Assemblywoman Alison McHose (Sussex), who both voted "no", and Assemblyman Erik Peterson (Hunterdon), who abstained.
After reflecting on it this morning, however, even Kean couldn't stand his own vote, and thinks it's crazy. He said he'll change it when the bill reaches the floor.
He voted the way he did, he says, because he doubted the bill would have any effect -- "What terrorist is going to apply for a firearm?" -- and was skeptical about the terror watch list: "The bottom line is, does anybody know what this list is, and who keeps this list?"
We can just see the hands of government officials shooting up in the air: The FBI's terror watch list includes hundreds of thousands of people who are suspected members of al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations, financiers of terror, recruiters and those who have attended terrorist training camps.
According to a Fox News report, more than 200 people on the terror watch list bought guns in 2010 alone. That's what made Kean change his mind.
Yet refusing these suspected terrorists their firearms is akin to a conspiracy, McHose argued yesterday. "This bill in my mind brings up memories of the 1950s and Hollywood and the witch hunt that went on with the people regarding communism," she said at the hearing.
Right. Recall that when President Obama decided to try the acknowledged mastermind of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on U.S. soil, Republicans groused that he was being too soft on terrorists. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani charged on Fox News, “This seems to be an over-concern with the rights of terrorists and a lack of concern for the rights of the public."
We couldn't have put it better here. Shame on any politician who allows a gun to be put in the hands of a suspected terrorist.
Follow @StarLedger
© NJ.com. All rights reserved.
This is good, but you forgot one main ingredient: MAKE THE BOLDED HEADLINE 5-POINT OR GREATER IN ORDER TO FULLY IMPACT THE READER WITH DERP!
it should be like this
Republicans support terrorist buying guns!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and if at all possible, make it ALL CAPS. THEN BLOW IT THE FUCK OUT OF THE WATER WITH SIZE.
REPUBLICANS SUPPORT TERRORISTS BUYING GUNS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What's an "assault weapon"?
^^ Derp jockey.
There is a fairly standard definition of assault weapons. You can wiki it. It's not perfect but it's fairly precise. Thank you for continuing to pretend to be ignorant however.
^^ Vette's right nut warmer.
Still in the closet I see, poser lawn jockey.
Still between Vette's pasty thighs I see, racist shitstain.
You really do dream about vette don't you LJ.