Democrats Are Broken To The Goose Step

[unregistered]

 

[Sean]

So you support terrorists and drug dealers?

 

[koalabear]

So you support terrorists and drug dealers?

Why not, Washington does, MORON.

 

[unregistered]

 

[cjh]

You would have supported Hitler. All Americans are not terrorists or drug dealers, but this does fit the Democrat model of violating all in order to get at a few.

Was John Yoo a Democrat?

 

[koalabear]

Was John Yoo a Democrat?

Shaddup pereg!

 

[Sean]

You would have supported Hitler. All Americans are not terrorists or drug dealers, but this does fit the Democrat model of violating all in order to get at a few.

Not all Muslims are terrorists, but you'd happily discriminate against them.

 

[IndieSnob]

Someone has a very selective memory about all the civil liberties and privacy that was destroyed starting in 2000.

Oh, but he was on the correct said of the aisle.

 

[cjh]

Someone has a very selective memory about all the civil liberties and privacy that was destroyed starting in 2000.

Oh, but he was on the correct said of the aisle.

Funny, that.

This President is no improvement; and I'm glad to say that civil rights organizations are taking his administration to task just like they did with Bush's. Funny how we don't hear of them being criticized for it this go around though.

 

[IndieSnob]

Funny, that.

This President is no improvement; and I'm glad to say that civil rights organizations are taking his administration to task just like they did with Bush's. Funny how we don't hear of them being criticized for it this go around though.

It's the reason I didn't vote for Obama.

He made a lot of promises about Guantanamo, the patriot act, etc. etc. and instead chickened out.

Oh wait, I'm supposed to be in support of him stripping civil rights.

 

[Busybody]

Was John Yoo a Democrat?

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[cjh]

It's the reason I didn't vote for Obama.

He made a lot of promises about Guantanamo, the patriot act, etc. etc. and instead chickened out.

Oh wait, I'm supposed to be in support of him stripping civil rights.

I am not certain that he chickened out. My guess is that he's as fond of executive powers as was Dick Cheney.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean]

We are talking about Americans, not all Muslims.

So there are no American Muslims?

 

[cjh]

What was he when he defended Bill Clinton's attack on Serbia without congressional approval?

Probably the same thing that he was when Bush appointed him Assistant US Attorney General in the Office of Legal Counsel.

 

[IndieSnob]

You start out with the stupid ass view post bullshit, and then you act like you have a selective memory when it comes to one of your boys.

I'm not doing your work for you.

 

[Busybody]

I'm not doing your work for you.

which means YOU CANT NAME EM

 

[cjh]

which means YOU CANT NAME EM

It means that it's stupid to suggest that Bush did not aggressively assert executive powers at the cost of individual liberties. Just like it's stupid to suggest that Obama has rebuked Bush's lead.

 

[unregistered]

 

[cjh]

What can I say, he's a product of Berkeley. Having said all of that however, how does what he said in the past have anything to to do with the overt action of the Obama administration in the matter being discussed. How does that rise to the level of this assault into the private lives of the civil society? How does his stated views support turning over all financial records of all Americans to the CIA?

The FBI already has the same powers, you dumbass.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Busybody]

It means that it's stupid to suggest that Bush did not aggressively assert executive powers at the cost of individual liberties. Just like it's stupid to suggest that Obama has rebuked Bush's lead.

that WSNT the issue

THIS WAS

about all the civil liberties and privacy that was destroyed starting in 2000.


name ALL THAT WERE DESTROYED