Democrats And Deep State Lied About Trump Collusion

Nuttier than a fruitcake You and Nunes.

You were part of it as well. You've repeated these lies for months. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF TRUMP/RUSSIAN COLLUSION. Out of hate, not evidence, you attempted to frame a duly elected President with false charges. You and the rest of the Lit left have been nothing but dumb sons of bitches for the last 14 months, and probably before.:rolleyes:
 
You were part of it as well. You've repeated these lies for months. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF TRUMP/RUSSIAN COLLUSION. Out of hate, not evidence, you attempted to frame a duly elected President with false charges. You and the rest of the Lit left have been nothing but dumb sons of bitches for the last 14 months, and probably before.:rolleyes:

You've been part of the BroPatrol that voted the idiot into office for 2 decades. And did you even read the article or did you pull a vetteman and forget that part?

The committee Republicans said they agreed that Russia sought to influence the election by spreading propaganda and false news reports via social media. However, they disputed the findings of the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation that Moscow sought to aid Trump, who won a surprise victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

A replitard committee trumped the entire intelligence community and you just brush it off.

THAT'S Deep State, dipshit.
 
You've been part of the BroPatrol that voted the idiot into office for 2 decades. And did you even read the article or did you pull a vetteman and forget that part?

The committee Republicans said they agreed that Russia sought to influence the election by spreading propaganda and false news reports via social media. However, they disputed the findings of the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation that Moscow sought to aid Trump, who won a surprise victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

A replitard committee trumped the entire intelligence community and you just brush it off.

THAT'S Deep State, dipshit.

Trump is on his fifth, four-year term?!??

How did that happen?
 
Maybe Nunes will write another memo outlining documents he has never read and run to the White House about a wire tap that never happened.
 
Who would have guessed if you don't go looking for something and instead go off on an unrelated tangent, you won't find anything?
 
Trump is on his fifth, four-year term?!??

How did that happen?

You need to quit trying to troll me, Q-Bert - it never ends well for you. Read with comprehension and show your work, dunce.
 
You need to quit trying to troll me, Q-Bert - it never ends well for you. Read with comprehension and show your work, dunce.

Have Fermina explain subordinate clauses to you and then come back and report to the class.

I can only "read for comprehension" what you actually write, not what you meant to write.
 
Have Fermina explain subordinate clauses to you and then come back and report to the class.

I can only "read for comprehension" what you actually write, not what you meant to write.

Take comfort in knowing you never stood a chance. :)

ETA: Plus, you obviously understood my pist after you looked without hate in your :heart:
 
Last edited:
You were part of it as well. You've repeated these lies for months. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF TRUMP/RUSSIAN COLLUSION. Out of hate, not evidence, you attempted to frame a duly elected President with false charges. You and the rest of the Lit left have been nothing but dumb sons of bitches for the last 14 months, and probably before.:rolleyes:


Here's a crazy thought: maybe the committee could have called as witnesses several key members of the Trump campaign, a few of whom already have guilty pleas to their name?

Flynn? Nope.
Manafort? Nope.
Papadopoulos? Nope.
Gates? Nope.


No one outside your little bubble of treason gives a shit, Vette.
 
Even better - some of those that have testified, like Erik Prince, are known to have lied before Congress and Numbnuts-Nunes is not pursuing them for contempt.

The comeuppance for that douchebag is going to be epic.
 
Here's a crazy thought: maybe the committee could have called as witnesses several key members of the Trump campaign, a few of whom already have guilty pleas to their name?

Flynn? Nope.
Manafort? Nope.
Papadopoulos? Nope.
Gates? Nope.


No one outside your little bubble of treason gives a shit, Vette.

The problem with your little fantasy is that Nancy Pelosi has stated repeatedly and publicly that "THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION."
 
Poor Reichguide, his threads even epically flail like vetteman's. :D:rolleyes:
 
Why aren't more Republicans celebrating this news tonight?

:)
:)
:)
 
The problem with your little fantasy is that Nancy Pelosi has stated repeatedly and publicly that "THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION."

The Swamp People investigated themselves. Really not that hard to understand.
 
Not to mention the folks that refused to answer question.

Bannon
Jr
Hicks
Lewandowski
Sessions

That is just off the top of my head.
 
The best will be when they get Trump under oath. That fucker won't get through his first sentence without perjuring himself.
 
Republicans shut down House Russia probe over Democratic objections
Patricia Zengerle


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...robe-over-democratic-objections-idUSKCN1GO2S1

The interesting thing about that article is it leaves this out completely :

...“We found perhaps some bad judgment, inappropriate meetings, inappropriate judgment in taking meetings. But only Tom Clancy or Vince Flynn or someone else like that could take this series of inadvertent contacts with each other, or meetings or whatever, and weave that into sort of a fiction page-turner, spy thriller.”...

https://apnews.com/dc7c4ec1be104801aefd46313fadb01b


So, riddle me this: If Hillary should go to jail for her "Extreme carelessness" of classified e-mails, why does the Donald get a pass for his above listed bad judgements? Isn't what's good for the goose good for the goosee? And if not why not? Or is it a double standard?


Comshaw
 
]

So, riddle me this: If Hillary should go to jail for her "Extreme carelessness" of classified e-mails, why does the Donald get a pass for his above listed bad judgements? Isn't what's good for the goose good for the goosee? And if not why not? Or is it a double standard?


Comshaw

Because taking meetings with people (D)'s don't like isn't a prison sentence for poor people.

Taking classified shit and even mistakenly loading it onto your personal electronic devices, much less knowingly and intentionally, is a prison sentence lots of poor people are in prison for right now.

Simply taking a picture in the wrong room or of the wrong piece of equipment or sheet of paper sitting on a desk can effectively end your life.

Unless you're an elite politician with AG and POTUS hooking you up.

The double standard is on the part of the rich elite politicians....it's not new...it's not even partisan....just good ol' fashioned elitism. Though partisans do support their party engaging in elitism, they are the enablers too, elitism couldn't get so prevalent if the people didn't support it.
 
Last edited:
You've been part of the BroPatrol that voted the idiot into office for 2 decades. And did you even read the article or did you pull a vetteman and forget that part?

The committee Republicans said they agreed that Russia sought to influence the election by spreading propaganda and false news reports via social media. However, they disputed the findings of the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation that Moscow sought to aid Trump, who won a surprise victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton.

t.

as opposed to MSM posting FAKE news and LYING
 
No she hasn't. Besides, how the eff would she know? She's not on any of the Committees investigating it.

HisArpy, such a reliable and ardent defender of Donald the Dum Dum. Facts don't stand in her way!

The problem with your little fantasy is that Nancy Pelosi has stated repeatedly and publicly that "THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION."
 
Fixed your post

Because taking secret meetings with Russians peddling dirt on Hillary Clinton isn't a prison sentence for people with the last name of Trump.

Taking classified shit and even mistakenly loading it onto your personal electronic devices, much less knowingly and intentionally, is excused when Trump does it.

Simply taking a picture in the wrong room or of the wrong piece of equipment or sheet of paper sitting on a desk will be excused by Republiturds.

The double standard is on the part of the BUT BUT E-MAILS hypocrites ....it's not new...it is partisan....just good ol' fashioned Trumpturd hypocrisy. .
 
Back
Top